From my many years as a therapist and advice columnist, I’ve started to see clear patterns in the problems that bother my readers the most. And I can confirm that existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre was right: hell is other people. It’s difficult relationships with those around us that cause the most anguish. It’s such a common theme that I’ve given a lecture on the subject: Why are other people so awful? To help you into the new year, here’s some advice on this most commonly experienced problem.
Struggles in connecting to others — or, more specifically, the tension between wanting connection and feeling disconnected — can manifest in many ways. As well as difficulties in existing relationships, such struggles can also make you feel lonely or alienated.
This sense of not belonging can undermine your wellbeing whether at work, home or even when doing pickup at the school gates.
Photo: AP
Many of us are anxious about how others perceive us, fearing rejection, which prevents us from forming meaningful connections. We often struggle with our self-worth and identity, feeling either unworthy or insecure in comparison to others, or — which is just as isolating — feeling superior to them. This leads to communication problems, which is another huge barrier to forming fruitful and honest relationships at work and home.
Alongside these often practical, interpersonal struggles, there’s also the more existential longing for deeper meaning in our lives — a desire to understand our place in the world and find purpose.
At the core, these issues touch on our innate need for connection, not only with others, but also with ourselves, and with that a broader sense of meaning in life.
So how do we achieve this? Well, for some, getting on with others just comes naturally. They just know when to smile, when to nod, how to be interested and how to lie to avoid hurting anyone’s feelings. They can naturally read people in professional settings and in their social circle. The rest of us just have to learn them.
Those who have these skills — often called “people skills” or “soft skills” — may mistakenly assume that those of us without them are being deliberately offensive. Recognizing where your innate ability lies is important. To do this you have to be able to accept all aspects of yourself, even the uncomfortable or imperfect parts, like jealousy or our capacity to hate. When we stop suppressing these complexities and embrace ourselves, we become more open to genuine connection with others. We can relate to those around us without the need to hide, compete or project insecurities.
By recognising these traits and accepting our strengths and weaknesses, we begin to relate to others with greater authenticity. It’s about being true to who we are, rather than presenting only what we think we should be.
Projection is another big obstacle to connection. When we haven’t acknowledged parts of ourselves, we tend to project these unresolved traits on to others. For instance, if we feel judged by others, it might reflect our own tendency to judge those around us. If you feel uncomfortable with other parents at the school gate, consider if your initial thoughts that they’re judging you are true, or whether you have feelings of inadequacy about your parenting skills, or lack confidence in these brief but fraught social interactions.
Often, we believe the solution to our problems lies outside ourselves, believing that if we leave the job, the relationship, everything will be fine. Of course, that can sometimes be true and it’s important to be alert to situations which are truly damaging. But the path towards feeling more connected to others usually starts from within. We must examine how we talk to ourselves, uncover the covert beliefs we live by, and confront the darker aspects of our psyche. One of the most disconnecting forces is our expectations of how others should be — but learning to accept people and things we cannot change can help us become more sanguine.
By acknowledging our shared humanity, and confronting our projections, we can form more genuine connections. Other people can be frightening, frustrating and downright annoying, but remember we’re all in the same boat and, hopefully, that journey will become more plain sailing. And, if someone ever really gets to you — you can always write to me for some more advice!
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS