Feces, vomit and fossilized food from inside stomachs have provided new clues into how dinosaurs rose to dominate Earth, a new study revealed on Wednesday.
Scientists have discovered plenty about dinosaurs — particularly about how they vanished off the face of the planet 66 millions years ago.
But “we know very little about their rise,” said Martin Qvarnstrom, a researcher at Sweden’s Uppsala University and the study’s lead author.
Photo: AP
Dinosaurs first appeared at least 230 million years ago, fossils have shown.
But they would not become the world’s dominant animal until the start of the Jurassic Period some 30 million years later.
What caused this ascension — and why it took so long — have long been a subject of fevered debate between scientists.
Photo: Reuters
For the new study in Nature, a European team exhaustively probed more than 500 “bromalites” — the fossilized remains of dinosaur feces, vomit and undigested food inside intestines — from sites in Poland.
“By linking the bromalites to the producers and identifying what’s in them, we can start connecting who ate whom or who ate what,” Qvarnstrom explained.
The researchers used new technology such as synchrotron microtomography to build a 3D image of the samples. This revealed that the excrement contained the remains of insects, plants, fish and bigger animals.
The researchers compared this with data about fossils, plants and the climate to construct a model for the step-by-step rise of the dinosaurs.
‘OPPORTUNISTIC ANIMAL’
This ascension was illustrated by the bromalites themselves, which tripled in average length and width over the 30 million-year period.
This demonstrated how the animals that digested, vomited or excreted these remains tripled in size over that time.
Some of the fossilized remains belonged to an early ancestor of dinosaurs, the Silesaurus.
Far from the mighty T-Rex, the “pretty small” Silesaurus weighed around 15 kilograms at most, Qvarnstrom said.
The dominant animal at the time were barrel-chested herbivorous reptiles called Dicynodonts, which weighed a few tons.
But Silesaurus had a big advantage over its stocky rival — it was omnivorous.
“What we see from its droppings is that it was eating a lot of insects, fish and plants,” Qvarnstrom said.
This meant the “opportunistic animal” was better at adapting to sudden changes in the environment.
For example, a massively rainy period called the Carnian Pluvial Episode lead to the evolution of many new plants. The big herbivorous reptiles struggled to adapt to this new diet. But the Silesaurus — and later long-necked dinosaurs that were ancestors of the Diplodocus — “were able to just feast on all these new plants,” Qvarnstrom said.
As the smaller dinosaurs grew bigger from this new grub, so did larger carnivores that fed on them.
By the time the Jurassic period rolled around, the landscape was dominated by giant plant-eating dinosaurs and ferocious carnivores.
COMPETING THEORIES
The study will not settle the debate about what led to the rule of dinosaurs once and for all.
There are two main theories for their rise. One is that early dinosaurs used key physiological advantages — such as standing upright — to outcompete their rivals. The other is that environmental upheaval, such as volcanic eruptions or a changing climate, killed off many of the previously dominant animals, creating an opening at the top.
The researchers behind the bromalites study suggested it was a combination of the two theories, in which the dinosaurs used their evolutionary advantages to capitalize on environmental changes that had knocked back their rivals.
Lawrence Tanner, a researcher at Le Moyne College in New York, said the study “should be seen as a starting point for further work.”
Although its methodology is “particularly creative,” the study is “limited in its context and scope,” Tanner commented in an attached Nature paper.
The research only covers the Polish Basin region, which at the time was part of the north of the Pangea supercontinent, he observed.
Qvarnstrom agreed, saying that he thought it would be “really cool” to use the model the team developed on other regions — such as the south of Pangea, where the first dinosaurs appeared.
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
JUNE 30 to JULY 6 After being routed by the Japanese in the bloody battle of Baguashan (八卦山), Hsu Hsiang (徐驤) and a handful of surviving Hakka fighters sped toward Tainan. There, he would meet with Liu Yung-fu (劉永福), leader of the Black Flag Army who had assumed control of the resisting Republic of Formosa after its president and vice-president fled to China. Hsu, who had been fighting non-stop for over two months from Taoyuan to Changhua, was reportedly injured and exhausted. As the story goes, Liu advised that Hsu take shelter in China to recover and regroup, but Hsu steadfastly
You can tell a lot about a generation from the contents of their cool box: nowadays the barbecue ice bucket is likely to be filled with hard seltzers, non-alcoholic beers and fluorescent BuzzBallz — a particular favorite among Gen Z. Two decades ago, it was WKD, Bacardi Breezers and the odd Smirnoff Ice bobbing in a puddle of melted ice. And while nostalgia may have brought back some alcopops, the new wave of ready-to-drink (RTD) options look and taste noticeably different. It is not just the drinks that have changed, but drinking habits too, driven in part by more health-conscious consumers and
On Sunday, President William Lai (賴清德) delivered a strategically brilliant speech. It was the first of his “Ten Lectures on National Unity,” (團結國家十講) focusing on the topic of “nation.” Though it has been eclipsed — much to the relief of the opposing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — by an ill-advised statement in the second speech of the series, the days following Lai’s first speech were illuminating on many fronts, both domestic and internationally, in highlighting the multi-layered success of Lai’s strategic move. “OF COURSE TAIWAN IS A COUNTRY” Never before has a Taiwanese president devoted an entire speech to
RSS