John Oller’s new book tells how the FBI took down John Dillinger, Baby Face Nelson, Bonnie and Clyde and other celebrity criminals of the 1930s, as President Franklin Delano Roosevelt waged his “war on crime.” In prose fast as an Essex-Terraplane getaway car, Oller recounts and deconstructs the myths that grew around such bank robbers, kidnappers and killers. He also spotlights the agents who chased and caught and sometimes killed the criminals or were killed themselves — names long eclipsed by that of J Edgar Hoover, who led the FBI for 48 years.
“Hoover was such a larger-than-life figure and he wanted to keep it that way,” Oller says. “He wanted his agents to be anonymous. If any name was going to be associated with the FBI, he was going to be it. And he pulled it off. That’s the reason none of these guys that I write about have ever been known. They kept it that way.”
Like the criminals they hunted, agents (“G-Men” in the slang of the day) have occasionally been played by Hollywood stars: “In the movie Public Enemies with Johnny Depp as Dillinger, Christian Bale played [Hoover’s deputy] Melvin Purvis. It was total miscasting. But none of the other guys in my book are really known to the public. Sam Cowley [who killed Baby Face Nelson but was killed himself, in 1934] may be known a little bit, if you’re really versed in the genre.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
“So I was attracted by the anonymity of these guys [and] I wanted to bring to the fore some of these people who had never been talked about … I wanted to track down the descendants.”
Oller did so, talking to sons and daughters, grandsons and granddaughters. If the result is a little more public interest in Walter Trainor, who unraveled the conspiracy behind the Kansas City Massacre, or Johnny Madala from Chicago, or Bill Rorer, who captured Machine Gun Kelly (the kidnapper, not the rapper), then to Oller, so much the better.
Oller is well aware the FBI’s reputation has never been spotless, though he does laugh at how distrust of the “Feds” has recently switched from left to right. Of Hoover, who died in 1972, Oller says he “takes a lot of criticism, some of it very justified.” Much of it comes from the 1950s and 1960s, when as the Guardian recently put it, Hoover pursued “strong-arm tactics, political manipulation and disregard for civil liberties, [using] the FBI’s extensive intelligence-gathering capabilities to monitor political dissidents, civil rights leaders and other groups he deemed a threat to national security.”
Looking back to the 30s, when Hoover sent agents chasing across state lines, Oller says: “One of the things a lot of critics say as well is, ‘Why did he spend all his time going after these two-bit bank robbers instead of the mafia, organized crime?’ The mafia, it was mostly a big-city phenomenon. They dealt in big-profit items: counterfeiting, prostitution, gambling, alcohol, drugs and the like. Whereas these guys” — Dillinger, Nelson et al — “were bank robbers and with some of these midwest banks they were taking a flyer, really.”
It was the time of the dust bowl and the Great Depression.
How much money would be in the bank?
“Sometimes the robbers were told, ‘Oh, there’s US$200,000,’ and they get there and there was only US$15,000 because the bank had just deposited its money in the Federal Reserve. But while bank robbery was fairly easy to succeed at, you had to be willing to shoot people, if necessary. There was killing of cops and innocent bystanders.”
“So I say in the book, it was true: if you were a Main Street shopkeeper or small-town cop or an innocent bystander on the street, you’re in much greater danger of being killed or seriously wounded by a John Dillinger or a Bonnie and Clyde than you were by Al Capone in Chicago. The mafia, big organized crime, they might go after each other at times, and they might go after the cops if they hadn’t paid them off sufficiently. But for the most part, it was the scourge of these bank robbers that got the FBI involved, and the kidnappings too.”
Last month historian Stephen Wertheim of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published an opinion piece in the New York Times with suggestions for an “America First” foreign policy for Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. Of course China and Taiwan received a mention. “Under presidents Trump and Biden,” Wertheim contends, “the world’s top two powers have descended into open rivalry, with tensions over Taiwan coming to the fore.” After complaining that Washington is militarizing the Taiwan issue, he argues that “In truth, Beijing has long proved willing to tolerate the island’s self-rule so long as Taiwan does not declare independence
Big changes are afoot in global politics, which that are having a big impact on the global order, look set to continue and have the potential to completely reshape it. In my previous column we examined the three macro megatrends impacting the entire planet: Technology, demographics and climate. Below are international trends that are social, political, geopolitical and economic. While there will be some impact on Taiwan from all four, it is likely the first two will be minor, but the second two will likely change the course of Taiwan’s history. The re-election of Donald Trump as president of the US
Nov. 25 to Dec. 1 The Dutch had a choice: join the indigenous Siraya of Sinkan Village (in today’s Tainan) on a headhunting mission or risk losing them as believers. Missionaries George Candidus and Robert Junius relayed their request to the Dutch governor, emphasizing that if they aided the Sinkan, the news would spread and more local inhabitants would be willing to embrace Christianity. Led by Nicolaes Couckebacker, chief factor of the trading post in Formosa, the party set out in December 1630 south toward the Makatao village of Tampsui (by today’s Gaoping River in Pingtung County), whose warriors had taken the
The Mountains to Sea National Greenway (山海圳國家綠道) draws its name from the idea that each hiker starting at the summit of Jade Mountain (玉山) and following the trail to the coast is like a single raindrop. Together, many raindrops form life and prosperity-bringing waterways. Replicating a raindrop’s journey holds poetic beauty, but all hikers know that climbing is infinitely more appealing, and so this installment picks up where the last one left off — heading inland and uphill along the 49.8-kilometer Canal Trail (大圳之路) — second of the Greenway’s four sections. A detailed map of the trail can be found
RSS