While US arms sales to Taiwan will likely continue whoever wins the presidential election, analysts say there are concerns in Taipei over a re-elected Donald Trump’s willingness to defend the country against China.
American voters will choose between Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican former president Trump on Nov. 5, with polls showing the pair neck and neck.
China has in recent years ramped up military pressure on Taiwan and has refused to rule out using force to bring it under its control.
Photo: AFP
CIA director William Burns said last year that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had ordered his military to be ready to carry out a successful invasion by 2027, and Xi recently told troops to strengthen their preparedness for war.
“There will be more uncertainty under a Trump administration,” said Chen Fang-yu (陳方隅), assistant professor of political science at Soochow University in Taipei.
Chen said Trump had suggested in interviews that the US cannot commit to defend Taiwan because they want to “bargain with China,” which he said was worrying.
Washington is Taipei’s most important ally and biggest supplier of weapons, but has long maintained a so-called “strategic ambiguity” when it comes to deploying troops to defend Taiwan.
Democratic President Joe Biden has said on several occasions that he would intervene if necessary, which the White House has walked back each time, but neither Harris nor Trump have been clear-cut.
Harris said in a recent interview that Washington “should not seek conflict” with China and declined to say whether the US would use military force to support Taiwan.
Trump has caused jitters by suggesting Taiwan pay the US for its defense, as well as accusing the country of stealing the US chip industry. John Bolton, who served as national security adviser to the former president before the two fell out, told the BBC recently that Taiwan was “potentially toast” if Trump were re-elected.
“Taiwan is no doubt anxious about the outcome of the US presidential campaign,” said Sung Wen-ti (宋文笛), a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Global China Hub, who is based in Taipei.
Sung said there were concerns that Harris might be “more inward looking than Biden,” and worries about Trump’s “transactionalist and mercantilist sentiments.”
‘TOO MUCH BAD BLOOD’
After Washington switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 1979, the US Congress enshrined into law a commitment to provide arms for the nation’s defense.
The US has sold Taiwan billions of dollars worth of military equipment and ammunition, including F-16 fighter jets and warships, despite repeated protests from Beijing.
On Friday last week, the US State Department approved a US$2 billion arms sales package for Taiwan that includes advanced surface-to air missile systems. While US officials insist that conflict with China is “neither imminent nor inevitable,” Washington’s efforts to arm Taiwan and China’s near-constant military presence around the island were fueling a cycle of escalating tensions.
This month, China deployed fighter jets, warships and coast guard vessels to encircle Taiwan in a large-scale military exercise. That was followed by a US and a Canadian warship transiting the Taiwan Strait, a Chinese aircraft carrier group sailing through the sensitive waterway, and Chinese and Taiwanese live-fire drills.
Each side perceived the other’s actions as “threatening” and therefore in need of a “defensive response,” said Rorry Daniels, managing director of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
“If you can deliver a credible reassurance that what you’re doing is defensive in nature, then the risk goes down,” she said, but there was “too much bad blood” for that to happen.
RECORD DEFENSE SPENDING
Taiwan would be massively outgunned in terms of troop numbers and firepower in any war with China and in recent years has jacked up spending on its military. Taipei allocated a record US$19 billion for this year and next year’s budget is set to hit a new high, as it seeks to bolster a more agile defense approach.
But the island has faced challenges in upgrading its defenses, Taipei-based security analyst J Michael Cole said.
A backlog of US arms sales to Taiwan now exceeds US$20 billion, according to Washington think tank Cato Institute. Cole said delivery delays for Taiwan were due to COVID-19 disruptions, and US weapons shipments to Ukraine and Israel.
And there has been resistance from some older generals in Taiwan to the move away from flashy purchases such as fighter jets and frigates to “more agile” and “survivable” equipment such as drones and missile launcher trucks.
“Turning these big conservative organizations around takes time,” Cole said. “The problem for Taiwan is that we don’t know how much time we have.”
Earlier this month Economic Affairs Minister Kuo Jyh-huei (郭智輝) proposed buying green power from the Philippines and shipping it to Taiwan, in remarks made during a legislative hearing. Because this is an eminently reasonable and useful proposal, it was immediately criticized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). KMT Legislator Chang Chia-chun (張嘉郡) said that Taiwan pays NT$40 billion annually to fix cables, while TPP heavyweight Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) complained that Kuo wanted to draw public attention away from Taiwan’s renewable energy ratio. Considering the legal troubles currently inundating the TPP, one would think Huang would
President William Lai’s (賴清德) National Day address was the source of far more activity and response than the speech itself warranted. The reactions to the speech and subsequent events by the local press, the international press and the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) mouthpieces were all very different. Michael Turton’s excellent piece, “Lai lays out the future” in the Oct. 14 edition of this paper, provided some much-needed context and a critical examination of some crucial domestic issues Lai failed to address, adding the glorious comment: “the world parses Lai’s speech like Roman priests inspecting the guts of a sacrificial animal
Last week two magnificent exhibitions opened in London. Both have as their theme the idea of the Silk Road, an-overland trade route said to stretch ever since antiquity all the way across Asia from China to Turkey and hence to Mediterranean Europe. The show at the British Library is entitled A Silk Road Oasis: Life in Ancient Dunhuang and focuses on the extraordinary haul of ancient documents found in the Mogao Buddhist cave temples by a Chinese Daoist priest and sold by him to the explorer and archaeologist Aurel Stein in 1907. Its treasures include the celebrated ninth-century Diamond Sutra, the earliest
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) last week told residents to avoid wearing scary Halloween costumes on the MRT so as not to alarm other passengers. Well, I thought, so much for my plan to visit Taipei dressed as the National Development Council’s (NDC) biennial population report “Population Projections for the Republic of China (Taiwan): 2024-2070,” which came out last week. Terms like “low birth rate” and “demographic decline” do not cut it — the report is nothing short of a demographic disaster. Yet, in Taiwan, as in other countries, it is solvable. It simply requires a change in mindset. As it