While US arms sales to Taiwan will likely continue whoever wins the presidential election, analysts say there are concerns in Taipei over a re-elected Donald Trump’s willingness to defend the country against China.
American voters will choose between Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican former president Trump on Nov. 5, with polls showing the pair neck and neck.
China has in recent years ramped up military pressure on Taiwan and has refused to rule out using force to bring it under its control.
Photo: AFP
CIA director William Burns said last year that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had ordered his military to be ready to carry out a successful invasion by 2027, and Xi recently told troops to strengthen their preparedness for war.
“There will be more uncertainty under a Trump administration,” said Chen Fang-yu (陳方隅), assistant professor of political science at Soochow University in Taipei.
Chen said Trump had suggested in interviews that the US cannot commit to defend Taiwan because they want to “bargain with China,” which he said was worrying.
Washington is Taipei’s most important ally and biggest supplier of weapons, but has long maintained a so-called “strategic ambiguity” when it comes to deploying troops to defend Taiwan.
Democratic President Joe Biden has said on several occasions that he would intervene if necessary, which the White House has walked back each time, but neither Harris nor Trump have been clear-cut.
Harris said in a recent interview that Washington “should not seek conflict” with China and declined to say whether the US would use military force to support Taiwan.
Trump has caused jitters by suggesting Taiwan pay the US for its defense, as well as accusing the country of stealing the US chip industry. John Bolton, who served as national security adviser to the former president before the two fell out, told the BBC recently that Taiwan was “potentially toast” if Trump were re-elected.
“Taiwan is no doubt anxious about the outcome of the US presidential campaign,” said Sung Wen-ti (宋文笛), a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Global China Hub, who is based in Taipei.
Sung said there were concerns that Harris might be “more inward looking than Biden,” and worries about Trump’s “transactionalist and mercantilist sentiments.”
‘TOO MUCH BAD BLOOD’
After Washington switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 1979, the US Congress enshrined into law a commitment to provide arms for the nation’s defense.
The US has sold Taiwan billions of dollars worth of military equipment and ammunition, including F-16 fighter jets and warships, despite repeated protests from Beijing.
On Friday last week, the US State Department approved a US$2 billion arms sales package for Taiwan that includes advanced surface-to air missile systems. While US officials insist that conflict with China is “neither imminent nor inevitable,” Washington’s efforts to arm Taiwan and China’s near-constant military presence around the island were fueling a cycle of escalating tensions.
This month, China deployed fighter jets, warships and coast guard vessels to encircle Taiwan in a large-scale military exercise. That was followed by a US and a Canadian warship transiting the Taiwan Strait, a Chinese aircraft carrier group sailing through the sensitive waterway, and Chinese and Taiwanese live-fire drills.
Each side perceived the other’s actions as “threatening” and therefore in need of a “defensive response,” said Rorry Daniels, managing director of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
“If you can deliver a credible reassurance that what you’re doing is defensive in nature, then the risk goes down,” she said, but there was “too much bad blood” for that to happen.
RECORD DEFENSE SPENDING
Taiwan would be massively outgunned in terms of troop numbers and firepower in any war with China and in recent years has jacked up spending on its military. Taipei allocated a record US$19 billion for this year and next year’s budget is set to hit a new high, as it seeks to bolster a more agile defense approach.
But the island has faced challenges in upgrading its defenses, Taipei-based security analyst J Michael Cole said.
A backlog of US arms sales to Taiwan now exceeds US$20 billion, according to Washington think tank Cato Institute. Cole said delivery delays for Taiwan were due to COVID-19 disruptions, and US weapons shipments to Ukraine and Israel.
And there has been resistance from some older generals in Taiwan to the move away from flashy purchases such as fighter jets and frigates to “more agile” and “survivable” equipment such as drones and missile launcher trucks.
“Turning these big conservative organizations around takes time,” Cole said. “The problem for Taiwan is that we don’t know how much time we have.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS