While US arms sales to Taiwan will likely continue whoever wins the presidential election, analysts say there are concerns in Taipei over a re-elected Donald Trump’s willingness to defend the country against China.
American voters will choose between Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican former president Trump on Nov. 5, with polls showing the pair neck and neck.
China has in recent years ramped up military pressure on Taiwan and has refused to rule out using force to bring it under its control.
Photo: AFP
CIA director William Burns said last year that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had ordered his military to be ready to carry out a successful invasion by 2027, and Xi recently told troops to strengthen their preparedness for war.
“There will be more uncertainty under a Trump administration,” said Chen Fang-yu (陳方隅), assistant professor of political science at Soochow University in Taipei.
Chen said Trump had suggested in interviews that the US cannot commit to defend Taiwan because they want to “bargain with China,” which he said was worrying.
Washington is Taipei’s most important ally and biggest supplier of weapons, but has long maintained a so-called “strategic ambiguity” when it comes to deploying troops to defend Taiwan.
Democratic President Joe Biden has said on several occasions that he would intervene if necessary, which the White House has walked back each time, but neither Harris nor Trump have been clear-cut.
Harris said in a recent interview that Washington “should not seek conflict” with China and declined to say whether the US would use military force to support Taiwan.
Trump has caused jitters by suggesting Taiwan pay the US for its defense, as well as accusing the country of stealing the US chip industry. John Bolton, who served as national security adviser to the former president before the two fell out, told the BBC recently that Taiwan was “potentially toast” if Trump were re-elected.
“Taiwan is no doubt anxious about the outcome of the US presidential campaign,” said Sung Wen-ti (宋文笛), a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Global China Hub, who is based in Taipei.
Sung said there were concerns that Harris might be “more inward looking than Biden,” and worries about Trump’s “transactionalist and mercantilist sentiments.”
‘TOO MUCH BAD BLOOD’
After Washington switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 1979, the US Congress enshrined into law a commitment to provide arms for the nation’s defense.
The US has sold Taiwan billions of dollars worth of military equipment and ammunition, including F-16 fighter jets and warships, despite repeated protests from Beijing.
On Friday last week, the US State Department approved a US$2 billion arms sales package for Taiwan that includes advanced surface-to air missile systems. While US officials insist that conflict with China is “neither imminent nor inevitable,” Washington’s efforts to arm Taiwan and China’s near-constant military presence around the island were fueling a cycle of escalating tensions.
This month, China deployed fighter jets, warships and coast guard vessels to encircle Taiwan in a large-scale military exercise. That was followed by a US and a Canadian warship transiting the Taiwan Strait, a Chinese aircraft carrier group sailing through the sensitive waterway, and Chinese and Taiwanese live-fire drills.
Each side perceived the other’s actions as “threatening” and therefore in need of a “defensive response,” said Rorry Daniels, managing director of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
“If you can deliver a credible reassurance that what you’re doing is defensive in nature, then the risk goes down,” she said, but there was “too much bad blood” for that to happen.
RECORD DEFENSE SPENDING
Taiwan would be massively outgunned in terms of troop numbers and firepower in any war with China and in recent years has jacked up spending on its military. Taipei allocated a record US$19 billion for this year and next year’s budget is set to hit a new high, as it seeks to bolster a more agile defense approach.
But the island has faced challenges in upgrading its defenses, Taipei-based security analyst J Michael Cole said.
A backlog of US arms sales to Taiwan now exceeds US$20 billion, according to Washington think tank Cato Institute. Cole said delivery delays for Taiwan were due to COVID-19 disruptions, and US weapons shipments to Ukraine and Israel.
And there has been resistance from some older generals in Taiwan to the move away from flashy purchases such as fighter jets and frigates to “more agile” and “survivable” equipment such as drones and missile launcher trucks.
“Turning these big conservative organizations around takes time,” Cole said. “The problem for Taiwan is that we don’t know how much time we have.”
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS