President William Lai’s (賴清德) National Day speech was exactly what most of us expected. It was pleasant, full of keywords like “resilience” and “net zero” and lacked any trolling of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Of course the word “Taiwan” popped up often, and Lai reiterated the longtime claim of his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), a claim that now dates back 30 years on the pro-Taiwan side. But it was gentle. Indeed, it was possible to see the speech as conciliatory, leaving room for the PRC to make a gesture.
That may have been one of its purposes: if the PRC responds with its usual aggressive provocations, it will be visible to the world that no change in the vocabulary of the Taiwanese leadership, except “we submit,” will meet with a positive response from the PRC. A quietly strong speech exposes how the constant claim of the pro-PRC side, that there is a verbal formula that will produce a return to the status quo, is a pro-PRC lie intended to discredit the pro-Taiwan side.
The foreign press has been rather calm in its reporting of the speech. Both the US and the PRC issued boilerplate, the former calling on the PRC to behave itself, the latter blasting Lai as a “separatist.” Rush Doshi, who as Biden’s PRC man on the National Security Council from 2021 to this year, tweeted out that “Lai’s 10/10 speech was more restrained than his inaugural.”
Photo: Tu Chien-jung, Taipei Times
Doshi implied, like many other commentators, that the ball was in Beijing’s court.
“So the question now is whether Beijing wants to respond with escalation or its own restraint,” he said.
The well-known scholar Lev Nachman observed that while the focus would be on continuities between previous president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Lai in their descriptions of Taiwan’s status, an important and often unnoticed continuity is “their emphasis on the need to address climate change and renewable energy.”
Photo: Tien Yu-hua, Taipei Times
This is critical, especially for a nation that puts out as much carbon dioxide as Taiwan does.
LAI AS CHEN SHUI-BIAN?
Like Tsai, Lai left the international media little it could use to insinuate that he was being provocative. While Tsai’s “measured” approach is generally discussed in the context of the PRC and the international security context, in fact she was trying to avoid being “ChenShuibianized” — treated as former DPP President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was by the international media, and turned into a madwoman who could declare independence at any moment.
Photo: Tien Yu-hua, Taipei Times
Although this risk waned as Tsai handled it well and Taiwan’s position in the world has changed, it has returned for Lai. His domestic opponents are hell-bent on turning him into the Second Coming of Chen, and they have deep links to scholars and finance moguls in the US who want to sell out Taiwan to the PRC. Even as Lai spoke, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), who skipped the speech for the second straight year, was posting on Facebook that Lai was a “troublemaker.”
DOMESTIC VISION SAME OLD, SAME OLD
While the world parses Lai’s speech like Roman priests inspecting the guts of a sacrificial animal for “provocations” and suchlike, it’s important to note what was omitted when Lai switched to the domestic side.
Photo: Tien Yu-hua, Taipei Times
“We will redouble our efforts to combat fraud and fight housing speculation,” Lai said.
What efforts against housing speculation? All they had to do was change the tax system when they controlled the legislature. They have known this for years. This is why they are losing voters.
“We will expand care for renters and strike a balance with the needs of people looking to change homes,” he said.
The idea of expanded care for renters is a concession that the next generation will not own homes and the government will not make the changes necessary to address that issue. Lai offered no vision of walkable, livable cities. No mention of single family housing. As University of Wyoming academic Chen Yi-ling (陳怡伶) observes of urban planning in Taiwan “residents of Taiwanese communities are completely unable to direct the development of their own living environment.”
No urgently needed changes in the domestic political economy were even nodded at. Lai’s really important continuity with Tsai was not her positioning on Taiwan’s international status, but their shared failure to challenge the developmentalist ideology that is killing Taiwan. Instead, Lai signaled that the system will continue, unchanged, offering rent subsidies and minimum wage rises as sops to the voters, but leaving the bosses and developers in the saddle.
Does the DPP even want votes in the next election?
Lai laid out a program of technology development and growth, but there was not a word about the immigration policies necessary to support it. In fact, Taiwan’s low birth rates, declining population and complete lack of immigration policy were hardly addressed in the speech.
Lai did mention child-care subsidies, but only in the context of existing children, not as a stimulus to have more. Of course, such a speech must be positive, but it must also be serious. Taiwan’s catastrophic demographic trends are vital national security issues, more important than Lai’s presentation of Taiwan’s status.
Lai’s speech was a concrete demonstration of what scholars Catherine Chou and Mark Harrison argue in their new book on Taiwan, Revolutionary Taiwan: Making Nationhood in a Changing World Order, that “the threat from China siphons off Taiwanese resources and energy from quality-of-life issues and long-term socioeconomic planning,” Chou herself said last week.
DEVELOPMENTALIST STATE
The PRC threat has enabled successive presidents to freeze Taiwan’s domestic political economy while buying off voters with subsidies. This is in part because Taiwan’s economic successes, the foundation of Taiwan’s independent existence, legitimate the developmentalist state, especially when Taiwan is compared to the PRC. This gives developmentalist structures and policies added ideological oomph.
Lai’s speech pays tribute to that construction of Taiwan’s history, not merely in its recapitulation of the past, but in its vision of the future. Lai said that the government would “roll out the new Silicon Valley plan for Taoyuan, Hsinchu and Miaoli to form a central technology cluster connecting the north with the south” (this implies that later in his presidency Hsinchu and Miaoli will be combined into a new municipality, as many have predicted), and offering the “Smart Technology Southern Industrial Ecosystem Development Plan.” Lai hit all the keywords: “smart,” “cluster,” “ecosystem” and “Silicon Valley.”
A developmentalist dream for a nation that will be short hundreds of thousands of tech workers by the end of his first term, and has no immigration policy.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Japan is celebrated for its exceptional levels of customer service. But the behavior of a growing number of customers and clients leaves a lot to be desired. The rise of the abusive consumer has prompted authorities in Tokyo to introduce the country’s first ordinance — a locally approved regulation — to protect service industry staff from kasuhara — the Japanese abbreviated form of “customer harassment.” While the Tokyo ordinance, which will go into effect in April, does not carry penalties, experts hope the move will highlight a growing social problem and, perhaps, encourage people to think twice before taking out their frustrations
From a Brooklyn studio that looks like a cross between a ransacked Toys R Us and a serial killer’s lair, the artist David Henry Nobody Jr is planning the first survey of his career. Held by a headless dummy strung by its heels from the ceiling are a set of photographs from the turn of the century of a then 30-year-old Nobody with the former president of the US. The snapshots are all signed by Donald Trump in gold pen (Nobody supplied the pen). They will be a central piece of the New York artist’s upcoming survey in New York. This
In the tourism desert that is most of Changhua County, at least one place stands out as a remarkable exception: one of Taiwan’s earliest Han Chinese settlements, Lukang. Packed with temples and restored buildings showcasing different eras in Taiwan’s settlement history, the downtown area is best explored on foot. As you make your way through winding narrow alleys where even Taiwanese scooters seldom pass, you are sure to come across surprise after surprise. The old Taisugar railway station is a good jumping-off point for a walking tour of downtown Lukang. Though the interior is not open to the public, the exterior
There is perhaps no better way to soak up the last of Taipei’s balmy evenings than dining al fresco at La Piada with a sundowner Aperol Spritz and a luxuriant plate of charcuterie. La Piada (義式薄餅) is the brainchild of Milano native William Di Nardo. Tucked into an unassuming apartment complex, fairy lights and wining diners lead the way to this charming slice of laid-back Mediterranean deli culture. Taipei is entirely saturated with Italian cuisine, but La Piada offers something otherwise unseen on the island. Piadina Romagnola: a northern Italian street food classic. These handheld flatbreads are stuffed with cold