Whole-body MRI scans have been around for more than a decade but it is only lately that they have started taking over social media feeds.
In a promotional post on Instagram last year, Kim Kardashian wrote about her experience of being scanned by what she called a “life saving machine.”
“It has really saved some of my friends lives and I just wanted to share,” she posted.
Photo: AP
Paris Hilton shared a similar experience of having a full-body scan to “proactively” rule out breast cancer.
“I encourage every single one of you to go get a scan,” she said.
Social media influencers and entrepreneurs promote the full-body MRIs as “super scans” that can detect early cancers and alert people to “silent killers.” They’re sold by tech and radiology companies as a risk-free way of getting a “complete health check” in an attempt to prolong your life.
Photo: AFP
But while the scans can be useful for people at high risk of certain genetic conditions or cancers, is there any evidence they can help people with an average or low risk of disease?
WHAT IS A FULL-BODY MRI?
The scan involves lying still on a long, narrow table which slides into a cylindrical machine. Powerful magnets, radio waves and computer imaging are used to create highly detailed images of the organs, joints and tissues.
Advertisements for the scans promote their ability to detect early signs of illness and present them as risk-free, aside from the discomfort that might come from lying on your back in an enclosed space for about an hour.
There are now private clinics offering the scans for upwards of US$800 to anyone who wants one — even if they have no symptoms or a referral from a doctor. The implication is almost anyone is a good candidate.
With most people affected by or aware of someone with cancer or heart disease, it may seem like a small price to pay for apparent peace of mind.
But according to those who endorse the scans, including celebrities, benefits abound, including the ability to detect things like cancer and aneurysms in their earliest stages, before symptoms arise.
WHAT DOES THE EVIDENCE SAY?
The University of Sydney public health researcher Brooke Nickel says full-body MRI scans can in fact have unintended negative consequences.
Expanding disease definitions and lowering diagnostic thresholds mean more people previously considered healthy or at low risk may now be classified as having a health condition or an indicator of disease, such as a shadow on an organ. This is known as overdiagnosis.
“The main concern with full-body MRI scans is that they have the ability to detect inconsequential disease leading to unnecessary diagnosis and treatments,” Nickel says.
“This can lead to individual harm and also impact the health system.”
Harms include the fear and anxiety that comes from being told something has been detected on a scan; the feeling that any abnormality should be treated and eliminated “just in case;” and the risk that comes with additional treatments to address whatever the scan may find. These treatments might be unnecessary, costly and come with side-effects.
Nickel says companies that manufacture medical devices and treatments can benefit from people’s fear of becoming unwell and their desire to be informed, by coming up with new health screening tools and detection tests, such as a full-body MRI.
“The premise that knowledge and information is power, while it used to make individuals feel more empowered about their health, is concerning when used by commercial entities or those with vested interest in relation to health interventions like tests, treatments and technology that are non-evidence based,” she says.
The tests can also be overly reassuring. A heavy smoker or regular drinker may feel there is no need to address those habits if a full-body scans reveals no abnormality. And full-body MRIs are not the best tool for detecting many of the diseases or functional issues related to lifestyle habits.
WHAT DO EXPERTS RECOMMEND?
Prof Rachelle Buchbinder, a rheumatologist and clinical epidemiologist, says the scans also detect common and normal age-related changes in the back and knees which are mostly benign. This can also lead to unwarranted diagnoses, worry and unnecessary treatment, she says.
Full-body MRI scans do have uses for people at high risk of certain genetic conditions or cancers, or to detect metastatic cancer, and only in these cases will a doctor-ordered test be covered by Medicare.
There is no evidence that these highly sensitive scans provide any overall benefit for people at average or low risk of disease. They do offer a good risk of overdiagnosis, unnecessary anxiety and a depleted bank account.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS