This is a film about two “fools,” according to the official synopsis. But admirable ones.
In his late thirties, A-jen quits his high-paying tech job and buys a plot of land in the countryside, hoping to use municipal trash to revitalize the soil that has been contaminated by decades of pesticide and chemical fertilizer use.
Brother An-ho, in his 60s, on the other hand, began using organic methods to revive the dead soil on his land 30 years ago despite the ridicule of his peers, methodically picking each pest off his produce by hand without killing them out of respect for nature.
Photo courtesy of Activator
This documentary is Yen Lan-chuan’s (顏蘭權) follow up to her acclaimed 2004 work Let It Be (無米樂), which followed the daily labor and lives of three elderly farmers in Tainan. That film was an unexpected hit and brought much attention to the state of Taiwan’s agriculture — in fact A-jen’s interest in farming was partially inspired by the documentary. Soul of Soil continues the theme but hones in on the degradation of Taiwan’s arable land.
“When I shot Let It Be, I saw the farmers’ attitude toward life, how they respect the heavens and love the land ... But I did not take the time to touch the soil — I did not know that Taiwan’s soil is sick.” Yen says on the film’s official page.
The film is quite long at 143 minutes, but the slow, laborious pace accentuates the Sisyphean persistence of the two idealistic protagonists, who meet up from time to time to discuss their methods and progress. The narrative is divided into four seasons with footage filmed over the course of six years, giving the audience a raw, poignant look at how A-jen and An-ho change as their quest goes on. But most of all, it’s the colorful personalities of the two that carry the show.
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Corp
A-jen is animated and awkward, he smokes a pipe and curses, constantly switching between Mandarin and Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese). He breaks out into laughter whether he’s excited, despondent or buried in garbage. His wife and two children help out when they can, and although they don’t fully approve of what he’s doing, they point out that he’s become a much happier and attentive person since he made the life change.
With only a few teeth left in his mouth, An-ho is more of a calm presence, but he’s undoubtedly quirky and has an interesting past as he didn’t begin farming until his 30s. Instead of environmental concerns, his ethos is simply inspired by the Taoist belief that all organisms are connected and should be respected. An-ho is very direct and no-nonsense, resulting in some funny one-liners. His family is also spotlighted as he is having trouble getting his children to continue his work.
What connects them is not just the soil, but their genuine, almost child-like determination to pursue their ideals, no matter the hardships they encounter.
With these two carrying the show, even a topic like soil revitalization becomes watchable for more than two hours. However, it feels as though a lot more problems with agriculture could be discussed, even marginally, such as the common practice of monocropping. In 2018, for example, A-jen’s entire field of pineapples were rendered unsellable because the market collapsed, and he suffered greatly because that’s the only thing he grew. An-ho’s dates also didn’t pan out one year, causing him huge losses. Furthermore, monocropping upsets the natural balance of the soil and depletes it of nutrients and organisms, which seems to defeat the original purpose. None of this is brought up.
Nevertheless, the state of Taiwan’s soil is a crucial topic to bring to light, especially as we face the threat of climate change and food shortages. This film accomplishes that in a heart-rending way that leaves an enduring impression. But where do we go from here? Very few people are willing to do what A-jen did, plunging his entire life and family into something seemingly without doing much planning or business strategizing. And An-ho’s life view and methods are not palatable for any of his five children, who just want to enjoy their lives. Meanwhile, government projects such as science parks and real estate developers continue to buy up the land.
The serene, folksy soundtrack was produced by “wandering bard” Chen Ming-chang (陳明章) and other experienced film scorers, with the theme song by Yang Ta-cheng (楊大正), lead singer of popular band FireEx (滅火器). Kuo Hua-jen (郭華仁), the former head of National Taiwan University agronomy department and current professor emeritus, served as consultant for the film.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS