This is a film about two “fools,” according to the official synopsis. But admirable ones.
In his late thirties, A-jen quits his high-paying tech job and buys a plot of land in the countryside, hoping to use municipal trash to revitalize the soil that has been contaminated by decades of pesticide and chemical fertilizer use.
Brother An-ho, in his 60s, on the other hand, began using organic methods to revive the dead soil on his land 30 years ago despite the ridicule of his peers, methodically picking each pest off his produce by hand without killing them out of respect for nature.
Photo courtesy of Activator
This documentary is Yen Lan-chuan’s (顏蘭權) follow up to her acclaimed 2004 work Let It Be (無米樂), which followed the daily labor and lives of three elderly farmers in Tainan. That film was an unexpected hit and brought much attention to the state of Taiwan’s agriculture — in fact A-jen’s interest in farming was partially inspired by the documentary. Soul of Soil continues the theme but hones in on the degradation of Taiwan’s arable land.
“When I shot Let It Be, I saw the farmers’ attitude toward life, how they respect the heavens and love the land ... But I did not take the time to touch the soil — I did not know that Taiwan’s soil is sick.” Yen says on the film’s official page.
The film is quite long at 143 minutes, but the slow, laborious pace accentuates the Sisyphean persistence of the two idealistic protagonists, who meet up from time to time to discuss their methods and progress. The narrative is divided into four seasons with footage filmed over the course of six years, giving the audience a raw, poignant look at how A-jen and An-ho change as their quest goes on. But most of all, it’s the colorful personalities of the two that carry the show.
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Corp
A-jen is animated and awkward, he smokes a pipe and curses, constantly switching between Mandarin and Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese). He breaks out into laughter whether he’s excited, despondent or buried in garbage. His wife and two children help out when they can, and although they don’t fully approve of what he’s doing, they point out that he’s become a much happier and attentive person since he made the life change.
With only a few teeth left in his mouth, An-ho is more of a calm presence, but he’s undoubtedly quirky and has an interesting past as he didn’t begin farming until his 30s. Instead of environmental concerns, his ethos is simply inspired by the Taoist belief that all organisms are connected and should be respected. An-ho is very direct and no-nonsense, resulting in some funny one-liners. His family is also spotlighted as he is having trouble getting his children to continue his work.
What connects them is not just the soil, but their genuine, almost child-like determination to pursue their ideals, no matter the hardships they encounter.
With these two carrying the show, even a topic like soil revitalization becomes watchable for more than two hours. However, it feels as though a lot more problems with agriculture could be discussed, even marginally, such as the common practice of monocropping. In 2018, for example, A-jen’s entire field of pineapples were rendered unsellable because the market collapsed, and he suffered greatly because that’s the only thing he grew. An-ho’s dates also didn’t pan out one year, causing him huge losses. Furthermore, monocropping upsets the natural balance of the soil and depletes it of nutrients and organisms, which seems to defeat the original purpose. None of this is brought up.
Nevertheless, the state of Taiwan’s soil is a crucial topic to bring to light, especially as we face the threat of climate change and food shortages. This film accomplishes that in a heart-rending way that leaves an enduring impression. But where do we go from here? Very few people are willing to do what A-jen did, plunging his entire life and family into something seemingly without doing much planning or business strategizing. And An-ho’s life view and methods are not palatable for any of his five children, who just want to enjoy their lives. Meanwhile, government projects such as science parks and real estate developers continue to buy up the land.
The serene, folksy soundtrack was produced by “wandering bard” Chen Ming-chang (陳明章) and other experienced film scorers, with the theme song by Yang Ta-cheng (楊大正), lead singer of popular band FireEx (滅火器). Kuo Hua-jen (郭華仁), the former head of National Taiwan University agronomy department and current professor emeritus, served as consultant for the film.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
RSS