This is a film about two “fools,” according to the official synopsis. But admirable ones.
In his late thirties, A-jen quits his high-paying tech job and buys a plot of land in the countryside, hoping to use municipal trash to revitalize the soil that has been contaminated by decades of pesticide and chemical fertilizer use.
Brother An-ho, in his 60s, on the other hand, began using organic methods to revive the dead soil on his land 30 years ago despite the ridicule of his peers, methodically picking each pest off his produce by hand without killing them out of respect for nature.
Photo courtesy of Activator
This documentary is Yen Lan-chuan’s (顏蘭權) follow up to her acclaimed 2004 work Let It Be (無米樂), which followed the daily labor and lives of three elderly farmers in Tainan. That film was an unexpected hit and brought much attention to the state of Taiwan’s agriculture — in fact A-jen’s interest in farming was partially inspired by the documentary. Soul of Soil continues the theme but hones in on the degradation of Taiwan’s arable land.
“When I shot Let It Be, I saw the farmers’ attitude toward life, how they respect the heavens and love the land ... But I did not take the time to touch the soil — I did not know that Taiwan’s soil is sick.” Yen says on the film’s official page.
The film is quite long at 143 minutes, but the slow, laborious pace accentuates the Sisyphean persistence of the two idealistic protagonists, who meet up from time to time to discuss their methods and progress. The narrative is divided into four seasons with footage filmed over the course of six years, giving the audience a raw, poignant look at how A-jen and An-ho change as their quest goes on. But most of all, it’s the colorful personalities of the two that carry the show.
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Corp
A-jen is animated and awkward, he smokes a pipe and curses, constantly switching between Mandarin and Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese). He breaks out into laughter whether he’s excited, despondent or buried in garbage. His wife and two children help out when they can, and although they don’t fully approve of what he’s doing, they point out that he’s become a much happier and attentive person since he made the life change.
With only a few teeth left in his mouth, An-ho is more of a calm presence, but he’s undoubtedly quirky and has an interesting past as he didn’t begin farming until his 30s. Instead of environmental concerns, his ethos is simply inspired by the Taoist belief that all organisms are connected and should be respected. An-ho is very direct and no-nonsense, resulting in some funny one-liners. His family is also spotlighted as he is having trouble getting his children to continue his work.
What connects them is not just the soil, but their genuine, almost child-like determination to pursue their ideals, no matter the hardships they encounter.
With these two carrying the show, even a topic like soil revitalization becomes watchable for more than two hours. However, it feels as though a lot more problems with agriculture could be discussed, even marginally, such as the common practice of monocropping. In 2018, for example, A-jen’s entire field of pineapples were rendered unsellable because the market collapsed, and he suffered greatly because that’s the only thing he grew. An-ho’s dates also didn’t pan out one year, causing him huge losses. Furthermore, monocropping upsets the natural balance of the soil and depletes it of nutrients and organisms, which seems to defeat the original purpose. None of this is brought up.
Nevertheless, the state of Taiwan’s soil is a crucial topic to bring to light, especially as we face the threat of climate change and food shortages. This film accomplishes that in a heart-rending way that leaves an enduring impression. But where do we go from here? Very few people are willing to do what A-jen did, plunging his entire life and family into something seemingly without doing much planning or business strategizing. And An-ho’s life view and methods are not palatable for any of his five children, who just want to enjoy their lives. Meanwhile, government projects such as science parks and real estate developers continue to buy up the land.
The serene, folksy soundtrack was produced by “wandering bard” Chen Ming-chang (陳明章) and other experienced film scorers, with the theme song by Yang Ta-cheng (楊大正), lead singer of popular band FireEx (滅火器). Kuo Hua-jen (郭華仁), the former head of National Taiwan University agronomy department and current professor emeritus, served as consultant for the film.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS