When the Society of Wilderness (SOW, 荒野保護協會) was established by a group of environmental activists in 1995, acquiring land where the NGO could implement its ideas of eco-friendly stewardship was among its long-term goals. But it wasn’t until 2018 that SOW was able to take ownership of their first plot, a 1761m2 tract of woodland and abandoned tea plantation in Yilan County’s Dongshan Township (冬山).
As Hsieh Hsiang-yen (謝祥彥), director of SOW’s Habitat Department, explains, the organization was first alerted to the plot’s existence by a SOW supporter who works at the Ministry of Finance’s National Property Administration (NPA) and who’d been keeping an eye open for potential sites.
“He referred us to a plot that had no owner, so we made some checks and conducted an ecological investigation of the site, to see if it was suitable,” Hsieh recalls.
Photo courtesy of Society of Wilderness
Among the NPA’s responsibilities is the management of properties that end up ownerless. This can happen if a deceased landowner’s next-of-kin renounce their rights, or if they fail to complete the inheritance registration process. The NPA arranged a public auction, at which SOW was the only bidder, and the NGO paid NT$960,066 to obtain ownership of the land.
For much of its existence, SOW lacked the funds to buy land. This changed in 2016, when one supporter donated NT$800,000 on condition it be used to acquire a slice of nature. Soon afterward, another backer gave NT$100,000 for the same purpose.
ESCAPING DEVELOPMENT
Photo courtesy of Society of Wilderness
Hsieh expresses confidence that what SOW now calls Wilderness No. 1 (荒野一號地) can escape the development that has impacted so much of Taiwan. Nobody lives nearby, and while those who farm nearby occasionally enter the property to check on their water pipes, for several years there’s been minimal human interference, he says.
Describing the state of the land as “very natural,” Hsieh says that access isn’t especially difficult, thanks to a narrow road built by state-run utility Taipower (台電) so it can maintain high-voltage power lines. Wilderness No. 1 can thus be used for ecological education activities designed to build awareness and attract new volunteers. However, because it’s relatively remote, finding people willing to conduct regular patrols and maintain the infrared camera traps that have been installed on the site is a challenge, he says.
SOW has been surveying Wilderness No. 1’s animal population, which includes pangolins and civets, and compiling data on the iNaturalist online platform. So far, no critically endangered species have been spotted — but experts were surprised to notice yellow-throated martens, mammals usually seen at higher elevations.
Photo courtesy of Society of Wilderness
“We’re building up a database of species, which we can use if we need to lobby against plans to develop the area,” Hsieh says.
The history of Wilderness No. 2 (荒野二號地) is quite different to that of Wilderness No. 1. Covering approximately 35,000m2, it’s also much bigger.
For more than 30 years, this patch of steeply sloping land in New Taipei City’s Sijhih District (汐止) was half-owned by Nan Ya Plastics Corp. (南亞塑膠), a listed company affiliated with the Formosa Plastics Group. In 2022, Nan Ya Plastics not only assigned its share to SOW, but also provided NT$350,000 to cover taxes and fees associated with the transfer.
Photo courtesy of Society of Wilderness
Even though SOW now shares ownership of Wilderness No. 2 with other entities, Hsieh doesn’t think that the group’s conservation goals will cause conflict. Nan Ya Plastics has coordinated and maintained good relations with the other stakeholders. What’s more, because the property is so difficult to reach, it’s very unlikely anyone will try to farm or build on it, he says.
Like Wilderness No. 1, Wilderness No. 2 is categorized by the government as forestry land. (In an emailed response, Nan Ya Plastics didn’t explain why they bought the land back in the 1980s.) SOW volunteers have identified orchid species there which, in other places, are often stolen. This is proof, Hsieh says, of how few humans set foot on this hillside.
Despite there being highly successful examples in other countries — perhaps the best known being the UK’s National Trust — Hsieh concedes that convincing Taiwanese to donate land to a nonprofit is extremely difficult. The NGO needs to show not just the best of intentions, but also the ability to look after the sites it acquires. It’s no surprise that he calls both Wilderness No. 1 and Wilderness No. 2 “huge landmarks for us.”
BUILDING ON EXPERIENCE
SOW has gained considerable experience when it comes to land regulations and management, as well as a better understanding of its volunteers’ abilities, he says. More and more people are helping the group in its search for other potential sites. An SOW supporter who works as a realtor brought one piece of land to the leaders’ attention, and this summer it became Wilderness No. 3 (荒野三號地).
Zoned as forest, the 29,961m2 property in Miaoli County’s Shihtan Township (獅潭) cost the NGO NT$5.91 million, including taxes and fees. Hsieh says there’s a high probability that leopard cats will show up in the vicinity.
What SOW hopes will become its fourth property is in Hsinchu County’s Hengshan Township (橫山). Part of the site is an orange orchard zoned for agriculture, while the remainder is forestry land.
When sufficient funds have been raised, taking ownership of the latter should be straightforward. However, because regulations restrict the ownership of farmland by nonprofits, the former is being purchased by SOW supporters who’ll entrust control of it to the group. A tenant farmer in Yilan County recently used a somewhat similar arrangement to protect the land she tills from development (see “Protecting Taiwan’s green spaces one ping at a time” in the April 10, 2024 Taipei Times).
According to Hsieh, right now a few volunteers are actively searching for more land which SOW can “protect and allow nature to manage itself and restore its vitality.”
While it’s true that the further a particular place is from a major human settlement, the more likely it is to be undeveloped and unpolluted, Hsieh says that SOW hopes to acquire plots of land which aren’t so remote.
Outlining what he calls a “thumbtack strategy,” he says that if the NGO can buy several small plots near major cities, they might be able to throw a wrench in the works when the authorities or large enterprises propose undesirable development projects. Hsieh cites as an inspiration the work of Japan’s Totoro Fund, which since 1991 has bought 57 pieces of land, noting that, by purchasing properties here and there, SOW may prevent unwanted development and help preserve ecological corridors.
“It’s taken time to build up our credibility. Now that we have it, we can only hope our work will become a lot easier in the future. We hope our volunteers can suggest possible ‘thumbtacks’ for us to buy. It’s all down to chance,” says Hsieh.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
While Americans face the upcoming second Donald Trump presidency with bright optimism/existential dread in Taiwan there are also varying opinions on what the impact will be here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump personally and his first administration, US-Taiwan relations blossomed. Relative to the previous Obama administration, arms sales rocketed from US$14 billion during Obama’s eight years to US$18 billion in four years under Trump. High-profile visits by administration officials, bipartisan Congressional delegations, more and higher-level government-to-government direct contacts were all increased under Trump, setting the stage and example for the Biden administration to follow. However, Trump administration secretary
The room glows vibrant pink, the floor flooded with hundreds of tiny pink marbles. As I approach the two chairs and a plush baroque sofa of matching fuchsia, what at first appears to be a scene of domestic bliss reveals itself to be anything but as gnarled metal nails and sharp spikes protrude from the cushions. An eerie cutout of a woman recoils into the armrest. This mixed-media installation captures generations of female anguish in Yun Suknam’s native South Korea, reflecting her observations and lived experience of the subjugated and serviceable housewife. The marbles are the mother’s sweat and tears,
In mid-1949 George Kennan, the famed geopolitical thinker and analyst, wrote a memorandum on US policy towards Taiwan and Penghu, then known as, respectively, Formosa and the Pescadores. In it he argued that Formosa and Pescadores would be lost to the Chine communists in a few years, or even months, because of the deteriorating situation on the islands, defeating the US goal of keeping them out of Communist Chinese hands. Kennan contended that “the only reasonably sure chance of denying Formosa and the Pescadores to the Communists” would be to remove the current Chinese administration, establish a neutral administration and
RSS