My friends and I have been enjoying the last two weeks of revelation after revelation of the financial and legal shenanigans of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head and recent presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
Every day brings fresh news — allegations that a building had purchased with party subsidies but listed in Ko’s name, allegations of downloading party subsidy funds into his personal accounts. Ko’s call last December for the regulations for the government’s special budgets to be amended to enforce fiscal discipline, and his September unveiling of his party’s anti-corruption plan, have now taken on a certain delightful irony.
On X, longtime Taiwan scholar and observer Mark Harrison tweeted: “Ko and the TPP in trouble. If only someone could have predicted this ... oh wait, all of #taiwantwitter did.”
Photo: Bloomburg
That’s pretty much correct.
All of Taiwan Twitter knew what Ko was, and how this would likely end. We’d lived through the low approval ratings of his mayorship in Taipei, and the major scandals during that time. So had the voters.
FOREIGN MEDIA TRACTION
Photo: CNA
The only place where Ko had traction was among young male voters, and of course, the media, especially the international media. The story was obvious: Ko and the young, and the international media ran with it. One is moved to wonder how much Ko benefited from all that free advertising, all that concealment of his true positions, all that disappearance of his past.
“A non-traditional candidate resonates with Taiwan’s youth ahead of Saturday’s presidential election,” scribed AP news. South China Morning Post said: “Ko Wen-je’s unconventional style and focus on domestic issues is winning support among young voters who are turning away from the main parties.” The Straits Times titled a piece: “Ko Wen-je, the improbable politician popular with young Taiwanese voters.”
He was often described as some variation on “a straight-talking politician.” This rhetorical position linking “non-traditional” or “maverick” with youth was common across the international media, whose verbiage is reflected in Taiwan’s own reporting.
Photo: CNA
In vain did local commentators writing in English point out that Ko was no maverick but was in fact an unimaginative cranky uncle-type authoritarian social conservative who had said aloud that people with non-standard sexualities had a mental illness, who had said of social housing that poor people did not deserve a three-bedroom house, whose economic and social ideas were decades out of date, whose inspirations were dictators like Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and former Taiwan president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and Singapore (he has likened the TPP to the People’s Action Party).
Little to none of that made its way into the foreign media. One has to wonder how someone who thought Singapore a model would have treated the international media, had he gained real power.
CONTEXTUALIZING KO
Photo courtesy of Taiwan People’s Party
The Guardian at least had a grazing shot at the issue in its election-eve report: “Depending on who is asked, Ko is a flexible pragmatist or a superficial populist who lacks core values.”
Some pieces similarly noted that he was not popular with older voters. Indeed, the thing about Ko highlighted in international media reports was always his alleged popularity with the young, never his unpopularity with older, wiser voters.
The reach for false balance (“depends on who you ask”) is a safe move, but ultimately, Taiwan would have been better served if any of the reports had evinced the depth and knowledge of longtime Taiwan watcher James Baron’s excellent piece at Unherd: “Is Ko Wen-je China’s man in Taiwan? The presidential candidate is the ultimate shapeshifter.” The title forthrightly locates Ko’s true politics and position in the political landscape, which Baron then backs up by quoting well-known Taiwan politics observers Lev Nachman and Nathan Batto.
The possibility that Ko was China’s preferred candidate came out quite early — he had to respond to that allegation in May of last year, for example. It was more or less AWOL from international press reports, except for a January Nikkei piece.
Another problematic stance Baron avoids is treating Ko as if he were sui generis. Instead, Baron backgrounds him against Taiwan history. That was one possibility — there were many ways Ko could have been contextualized. Ko could also have been backgrounded against his own historical dreams, preconceptions, ideals and political mimicry, as an excellent February piece in the Melbourne Asia Review did.
I did so in last month, discussing him in light of his emulation of Chiang Ching-kuo. Ironically, the only international media piece I could find that linked a presidential candidate to Chiang was a Reuters piece about the DPP’s William Lai.
CREATED BY THE MEDIA
Ko was sometimes compared to Trump, who similarly cried that his nation would be lost if he were not elected, but the international media failed to place Ko in a much broader comparison with other populist and would-be populist leaders around the globe.
That would have been helpful in understanding what he was, an understanding that could have been reflected back to Taiwan. It would also have helped contextualize why older voters were turned off by Ko: we’ve all seen multiple examples of politicians like Ko in our lifetimes. The comparison to Trump is apt: Trump, like Ko, was and is in part a creation of the media. If only it had learned from the Trump experience.
Consider just one item widely cited by local observers and media, Ko’s constant reference to his own superior intelligence and his abuse of people without college educations. This is often instanced by his local critics. For example, the extraordinary writers Albert Wu (吳孟軒) and Michelle Kuo (郭怡慧) of A Broad and Ample Road, explaining why progressives hate Ko, point to his “unabashed, unapologetic, self-aggrandizing elitism. Ko often refers to his IQ score of 157, name-drops NTU ...”
This is a quintessential behavior of Ko’s. Good luck finding it widely reported in the international media.
Fast forward to last month, with its deluge of scandals involving Ko and his party for nearly three weeks now. The reader can be forgiven for expecting a reciprocal deluge of international media reports on the “maverick” and “outsider” and his scandals, especially since Taiwan is now well-stocked with talented international reporters, but as I write this, the only piece in a major international media I can find is from the always solid Nikkei, dated Aug. 16.
I guess when the only thing truly “maverick” about Ko is his unexcelled naivete about stocking his party with ex-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) people, the international media loses interest.
As of this writing, Ko has announced that he will be stepping down as party chair for three months.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
Hourglass-shaped sex toys casually glide along a conveyor belt through an airy new store in Tokyo, the latest attempt by Japanese manufacturer Tenga to sell adult products without the shame that is often attached. At first glance it’s not even obvious that the sleek, colorful products on display are Japan’s favorite sex toys for men, but the store has drawn a stream of couples and tourists since opening this year. “Its openness surprised me,” said customer Masafumi Kawasaki, 45, “and made me a bit embarrassed that I’d had a ‘naughty’ image” of the company. I might have thought this was some kind
What first caught my eye when I entered the 921 Earthquake Museum was a yellow band running at an angle across the floor toward a pile of exposed soil. This marks the line where, in the early morning hours of Sept. 21, 1999, a massive magnitude 7.3 earthquake raised the earth over two meters along one side of the Chelungpu Fault (車籠埔斷層). The museum’s first gallery, named after this fault, takes visitors on a journey along its length, from the spot right in front of them, where the uplift is visible in the exposed soil, all the way to the farthest
The room glows vibrant pink, the floor flooded with hundreds of tiny pink marbles. As I approach the two chairs and a plush baroque sofa of matching fuchsia, what at first appears to be a scene of domestic bliss reveals itself to be anything but as gnarled metal nails and sharp spikes protrude from the cushions. An eerie cutout of a woman recoils into the armrest. This mixed-media installation captures generations of female anguish in Yun Suknam’s native South Korea, reflecting her observations and lived experience of the subjugated and serviceable housewife. The marbles are the mother’s sweat and tears,
RSS