My friends and I have been enjoying the last two weeks of revelation after revelation of the financial and legal shenanigans of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head and recent presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
Every day brings fresh news — allegations that a building had purchased with party subsidies but listed in Ko’s name, allegations of downloading party subsidy funds into his personal accounts. Ko’s call last December for the regulations for the government’s special budgets to be amended to enforce fiscal discipline, and his September unveiling of his party’s anti-corruption plan, have now taken on a certain delightful irony.
On X, longtime Taiwan scholar and observer Mark Harrison tweeted: “Ko and the TPP in trouble. If only someone could have predicted this ... oh wait, all of #taiwantwitter did.”
Photo: Bloomburg
That’s pretty much correct.
All of Taiwan Twitter knew what Ko was, and how this would likely end. We’d lived through the low approval ratings of his mayorship in Taipei, and the major scandals during that time. So had the voters.
FOREIGN MEDIA TRACTION
Photo: CNA
The only place where Ko had traction was among young male voters, and of course, the media, especially the international media. The story was obvious: Ko and the young, and the international media ran with it. One is moved to wonder how much Ko benefited from all that free advertising, all that concealment of his true positions, all that disappearance of his past.
“A non-traditional candidate resonates with Taiwan’s youth ahead of Saturday’s presidential election,” scribed AP news. South China Morning Post said: “Ko Wen-je’s unconventional style and focus on domestic issues is winning support among young voters who are turning away from the main parties.” The Straits Times titled a piece: “Ko Wen-je, the improbable politician popular with young Taiwanese voters.”
He was often described as some variation on “a straight-talking politician.” This rhetorical position linking “non-traditional” or “maverick” with youth was common across the international media, whose verbiage is reflected in Taiwan’s own reporting.
Photo: CNA
In vain did local commentators writing in English point out that Ko was no maverick but was in fact an unimaginative cranky uncle-type authoritarian social conservative who had said aloud that people with non-standard sexualities had a mental illness, who had said of social housing that poor people did not deserve a three-bedroom house, whose economic and social ideas were decades out of date, whose inspirations were dictators like Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and former Taiwan president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and Singapore (he has likened the TPP to the People’s Action Party).
Little to none of that made its way into the foreign media. One has to wonder how someone who thought Singapore a model would have treated the international media, had he gained real power.
CONTEXTUALIZING KO
Photo courtesy of Taiwan People’s Party
The Guardian at least had a grazing shot at the issue in its election-eve report: “Depending on who is asked, Ko is a flexible pragmatist or a superficial populist who lacks core values.”
Some pieces similarly noted that he was not popular with older voters. Indeed, the thing about Ko highlighted in international media reports was always his alleged popularity with the young, never his unpopularity with older, wiser voters.
The reach for false balance (“depends on who you ask”) is a safe move, but ultimately, Taiwan would have been better served if any of the reports had evinced the depth and knowledge of longtime Taiwan watcher James Baron’s excellent piece at Unherd: “Is Ko Wen-je China’s man in Taiwan? The presidential candidate is the ultimate shapeshifter.” The title forthrightly locates Ko’s true politics and position in the political landscape, which Baron then backs up by quoting well-known Taiwan politics observers Lev Nachman and Nathan Batto.
The possibility that Ko was China’s preferred candidate came out quite early — he had to respond to that allegation in May of last year, for example. It was more or less AWOL from international press reports, except for a January Nikkei piece.
Another problematic stance Baron avoids is treating Ko as if he were sui generis. Instead, Baron backgrounds him against Taiwan history. That was one possibility — there were many ways Ko could have been contextualized. Ko could also have been backgrounded against his own historical dreams, preconceptions, ideals and political mimicry, as an excellent February piece in the Melbourne Asia Review did.
I did so in last month, discussing him in light of his emulation of Chiang Ching-kuo. Ironically, the only international media piece I could find that linked a presidential candidate to Chiang was a Reuters piece about the DPP’s William Lai.
CREATED BY THE MEDIA
Ko was sometimes compared to Trump, who similarly cried that his nation would be lost if he were not elected, but the international media failed to place Ko in a much broader comparison with other populist and would-be populist leaders around the globe.
That would have been helpful in understanding what he was, an understanding that could have been reflected back to Taiwan. It would also have helped contextualize why older voters were turned off by Ko: we’ve all seen multiple examples of politicians like Ko in our lifetimes. The comparison to Trump is apt: Trump, like Ko, was and is in part a creation of the media. If only it had learned from the Trump experience.
Consider just one item widely cited by local observers and media, Ko’s constant reference to his own superior intelligence and his abuse of people without college educations. This is often instanced by his local critics. For example, the extraordinary writers Albert Wu (吳孟軒) and Michelle Kuo (郭怡慧) of A Broad and Ample Road, explaining why progressives hate Ko, point to his “unabashed, unapologetic, self-aggrandizing elitism. Ko often refers to his IQ score of 157, name-drops NTU ...”
This is a quintessential behavior of Ko’s. Good luck finding it widely reported in the international media.
Fast forward to last month, with its deluge of scandals involving Ko and his party for nearly three weeks now. The reader can be forgiven for expecting a reciprocal deluge of international media reports on the “maverick” and “outsider” and his scandals, especially since Taiwan is now well-stocked with talented international reporters, but as I write this, the only piece in a major international media I can find is from the always solid Nikkei, dated Aug. 16.
I guess when the only thing truly “maverick” about Ko is his unexcelled naivete about stocking his party with ex-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) people, the international media loses interest.
As of this writing, Ko has announced that he will be stepping down as party chair for three months.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
When nature calls, Masana Izawa has followed the same routine for more than 50 years: heading out to the woods in Japan, dropping his pants and doing as bears do. “We survive by eating other living things. But you can give faeces back to nature so that organisms in the soil can decompose them,” the 74-year-old said. “This means you are giving life back. What could be a more sublime act?” “Fundo-shi” (“poop-soil master”) Izawa is something of a celebrity in Japan, publishing books, delivering lectures and appearing in a documentary. People flock to his “Poopland” and centuries-old wooden “Fundo-an” (“poop-soil house”) in
Jan 13 to Jan 19 Yang Jen-huang (楊仁煌) recalls being slapped by his father when he asked about their Sakizaya heritage, telling him to never mention it otherwise they’ll be killed. “Only then did I start learning about the Karewan Incident,” he tells Mayaw Kilang in “The social culture and ethnic identification of the Sakizaya” (撒奇萊雅族的社會文化與民族認定). “Many of our elders are reluctant to call themselves Sakizaya, and are accustomed to living in Amis (Pangcah) society. Therefore, it’s up to the younger generation to push for official recognition, because there’s still a taboo with the older people.” Although the Sakizaya became Taiwan’s 13th
For anyone on board the train looking out the window, it must have been a strange sight. The same foreigner stood outside waving at them four different times within ten minutes, three times on the left and once on the right, his face getting redder and sweatier each time. At this unique location, it’s actually possible to beat the train up the mountain on foot, though only with extreme effort. For the average hiker, the Dulishan Trail is still a great place to get some exercise and see the train — at least once — as it makes its way
Earlier this month, a Hong Kong ship, Shunxin-39, was identified as the ship that had cut telecom cables on the seabed north of Keelung. The ship, owned out of Hong Kong and variously described as registered in Cameroon (as Shunxin-39) and Tanzania (as Xinshun-39), was originally People’s Republic of China (PRC)-flagged, but changed registries in 2024, according to Maritime Executive magazine. The Financial Times published tracking data for the ship showing it crossing a number of undersea cables off northern Taiwan over the course of several days. The intent was clear. Shunxin-39, which according to the Taiwan Coast Guard was crewed
RSS