The Hindu sacred month of Shravan honors the god of destruction Lord Shiva, and in northern India, it has become increasingly associated with mob violence by saffron-clad devotees.
Analysts say the increase in violence, and the muted response to stop it by the authorities, is a reaction to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu-first politics.
Millions of people mark the month by trekking — some hundreds of kilometers — to collect holy water from the sacred Ganges river and carry it home to shrines, a celebration of the monsoon rains and new beginnings.
Photos: AFP
Many are young and poor men, dedicated to their deity — but also partying and taking a break from tough day-wage labor for a rare few weeks of fun, blaring loud music and smoking strong cannabis.
They are known as “Kanwarias,” after the bamboo poles across their shoulders they use to carry the heavy containers of sacred water.
This year, after the month-long pilgrimage started in late July, lawlessness surged.
Photo: AFP
The pilgrims have been caught multiple times on camera running riot — seen in videos shared widely on social media.
They include vandalizing a fuel station for being asked to stop smoking, violent road rage leaving passers-by grievously injured, and groups of Kanwarias fighting among themselves.
Pilgrims insist that hooliganism is restricted to a few stray incidents, blaming devotees who over-indulge in cannabis.
“There are rotten apples everywhere,” said 30-year-old Sachin Chawla, a Kanwaria puffing out clouds of fragrant smoke from a cigarette.
“Some people tend to get high and create a ruckus.”
‘SUBORDINATE TO THE PARTY’
Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has boosted support for the travelers.
In the country’s most populous state Uttar Pradesh — whose chief minister is a hardline Hindu monk and key BJP leader — top government officials showered flower petals on the devotees from a helicopter.
That came days after pilgrims overturned a government security car.
The Modi government has “put across the message that the state is subordinate to the party in power”, said Sanjay Srivastava, an anthropologist teaching at SOAS University of London.
“This messaging seems to be clearly understood on the ground”.
Many devout Hindus are vegetarian during Shravan, and in several BJP-run states, local administrations ban meat on pilgrim routes.
But this year, some went further. Two state governments ordered restaurants to display the names of their owners, a rule that critics said was intended to divide restaurants by religion and target minority Muslims.
The order was later suspended by the Supreme Court.
ANCIENT TRADITION, NEW POPULARITY
Rickshaw-puller Kamal Kumar had spent two weeks walking nearly 200 kilometers carrying 70 liters of water in containers slung from a bamboo pole across his shoulders.
He had a day to go to his destination, a temple in the capital Delhi.
“I do it for Baba,” said the 20-year-old, using a term of endearment for Shiva. “Whatever I have, it is his doing.”
The number of devotees undertaking this journey is swelling by the year, according to official numbers.
Organizers estimate some 45 million people — more than the population of Canada — assembled in the holy Ganges-side city of Haridwar to collect water this year, a rise of 50 percent from 2017.
Most are poor, male, unemployed or work precarious menial jobs.
The offer of aid from a god has resounding appeal in “an uncertain economy with large-scale unemployment”, Srivastava said. “Everyone around me goes, so I also decided to go,” said Siddharth Kumar, a jobless 18-year-old who resides in a slum on the fringes of Delhi.
“I hope god does something for me and my family.”
Srivastava said more men now undertake the pilgrimage because there is a “broader climate of encouragement for participation in public religious activities.”
Popularity has been boosted within the context of “underemployed men’s activities, as well as a source seeking divine intervention for their precarious economic situation,” he added.
‘HOLIDAY’
The pilgrimage allows the working class to briefly “occupy the center stage,” said sociologist Ravinder Kaur, from the University of Copenhagen.
“It is as much an expression of vast class and caste inequalities that shape contemporary India,” she said. For many men, the journey is as much an opportunity to bond with friends.
Less dedicated devotees skip the walk, crowding into open trucks or on motorbikes, playing thumping music.
“I went with my friends from the neighborhood on our motorbikes,” said 23-year-old electrician Sunny Prajapati.
“Along with the chance to offer our prayers, we also get to go on a joy ride together — it is like a holiday.”
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS