The stress of bereavement may accelerate the aging process, according to researchers who found evidence that losing a loved one early in life had an impact long before people reach middle age.
Scientists spotted biological markers of faster aging in people who had lost a parent, partner, sibling or child, but the signs were absent in others who had not experienced the death of someone close to them.
The finding suggests bereavement and grief take their toll on the body’s tissues and potentially increase the risk of future health problems. But it also raises the prospect that counseling and effective social support could help in the aftermath of a death.
Photo: AFP
Allison Aiello, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University in New York, said losing someone close was a “significant stressor” and a life experience consistently linked to poorer mental health, cognitive impairment, heart and metabolic problems and an earlier death.
“Our research reveals a significant association between experiencing losses from childhood through adulthood and biological signs of aging,” Aiello said.
The decline in tissue and organ function brought on by accelerated aging might explain in part why bereavement can have such an impact on health.
The researchers drew on data from the US National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, which followed participants from their teenage years into adulthood. In particular, they looked at people who were bereaved before the age of 18, and from 19 to 43 years old.
Biological aging was assessed by analyzing people’s DNA for chemical changes that build up over the years. These epigenetic clocks can reveal whether a person’s biological age is older or younger than their chronological age, which has a bearing on disease risk in later life, Aiello said.
Among 3,963 people studied, nearly 40 percent had lost a loved one by adulthood. Those who experienced more bereavements had significantly older biological ages than those who had not lost people close to them.
Given the results, published in Jama Network Open, Aiello said research should now focus on whether helping the bereaved with counseling and coping strategies reduces the aging effect.
“These insights could inform clinical and public health approaches to improving health outcomes following a loss,” she said.
The study appears alongside separate work on the impacts of a healthy diet and added sugar on biological age. According to the research, women in the US who followed a vitamin and mineral-rich diet had a younger biological age than those on poorer diets. But even for the women who ate healthily, each gram of added sugar was linked to a rise in biological age.
“It’s the first demonstration of the effect of added sugars on our epigenetic aging,” said Elissa Epel, an author on the paper and professor in the department of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco.
The researchers analyzed food records from 342 Black and white women from northern California and compared them with healthy eating habits, such as the Mediterranean diet, which is rich in anti-inflammatory and antioxidant compounds.
Women who ate more healthily had a lower biological age, according to their epigenetic clocks, but the scientists saw faster biological aging in those who consumed foods with added sugar. The women in the study ate between 2.7g and 316g of added sugar a day.
“It appears … that both having a diet high in nutrients and low in added sugars matters,” said Barbara Laraia, a senior author on the study and professor of community health sciences at the University of California, Berkeley.
Dorothy Chiu, a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California, San Francisco, and first author on the paper, said she would expect similar effects in men.
Under UK guidelines, free sugars — those added to food and drinks, and found naturally in products such as honey and smoothies — should not make up more than 5 percent of daily calories, with adults having no more than 30g, equivalent to seven sugar cubes daily.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
RSS