Stepping inside Waley Art (水谷藝術) in Taipei’s historic Wanhua District (萬華區) one leaves the motorcycle growl and air-conditioner purr of the street and enters a very different sonic realm.
Speakers hiss, machines whir and objects chime from all five floors of the shophouse-turned- contemporary art gallery (including the basement).
“It’s a bit of a metaphor, the stacking of gallery floors is like the layering of sounds,” observes Australian conceptual artist Samuel Beilby, whose audio installation HZ & Machinic Paragenesis occupies the ground floor of the gallery space.
Photo courtesy of Samuel Beilby
He’s not wrong.
Put ‘em in a Box (我們把它都裝在一個盒子裡), which runs until Aug. 18, invites gallery-goers to “think outside the box” with an eclectic array of multi-media installations that explore human relationships with sound.
This brain-expanding exhibition is the brainchild of curator Shih Ya-tien (施雅恬), from Tainan, who says it took her a full year to put the whole project together.
Photo: Thomas Bird, Taipei Times
“The artists are all from different cities, from Helsinki to Perth, but we are all very interested in using sound as the material to make our work,” she says. “We’ve been sharing recordings on a Google Drive.”
Shih says she chose Waley Art to bring her disparate band of sound sculptors together because it’s one of Taipei’s “more experimental spaces” that “welcomes all kinds of novel experiences.”
SCULPTORS OF SOUND
Photo courtesy of Waley Art
Shih says she views cities as “vast containers, encompassing the chirps of birds, barks of dogs,” as well as “the noises of traffic and construction sites.”
Humans have invented devices for the production and reproduction of sound and these devices “act as containers, which facilitate the reception and circulation of intricate, mundane secrets.”
These so-called “containers” are the focus of the exhibition.
Photo courtesy of Waley Art
The talents of five artists, Chi Po-hao (紀柏豪), Chloe Lin (林雨儂), Sarah Song (宋夏然), Samuel Beilby and Elico Suzuki are employed to investigate sound through their respective creative practices.
The results are as varied as they are unique.
“I went to three automated warehouses in Taiwan,” explains Beilby, “and recorded the electromagnetic frequencies on some microphones, ethereal sounds that you can’t ordinarily hear.”
Photo: Thomas Bird, Taipei Times
The robotic noises he captured can be listened to via headphones stationed on the gallery wall next to physical representations of the sounds.
“The sculptures are generated from audio. And the maps map-out my methodology — where I went to grab invisible sounds.”
On the second floor, Tokyo-based sound artist Elico Suzuki has created a startling array of self-made instruments exploring ecological and social themes.
Photo: Thomas Bird, Taipei Times
These include the mixed media object For The Birds whereby a small monitor is attached to a toy piano by a home-made circuit.
Each time a bird takes flight on the monitor screen, it triggers a sensor, which plays a note on the piano.
On the fourth floor, there’s a giant, transparent ball called We Made Sound in a Box (我們在盒子裡發聲音), which amplifies exclamations like “aha.”
It is the creation of Taipei-based creative Chloe Lin who began her sonic journey as a student of classical music at National Taiwan Normal University.
“My instrument is the pipa,” she says of the pear-shaped string-instrument sometimes referred to as a Chinese lute.
Lin started to experiment with improvisation and dance while in Taipei but it wasn’t until she enrolled in a Master’s degree program at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago that she says her audio palette broadened to incorporate different sound textures and approaches.
The result is a visually and audibly arresting creation.
“I collected all different kinds of meaningless sounds from different languages, Japanese, Chinese and English, male or female. I even got AI to mimic a human voice.”
She says that people use sound to express an emotion or momentary feeling. It was these “pure notes” that she collected to make her composition.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS