July 15 to July 21
Depending on who you ask, Taiwan Youth (台灣青年) was a magazine that either spoke out against Japanese colonialism, espoused Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ideology or promoted Taiwanese independence.
That’s because three publications with contrasting ideologies, all bearing the same Chinese name, were established between 1920 and 1960. Curiously, none of them originated in Taiwan.
Photo courtesy of National Central Library
The best known is probably The Tai Oan Chheng Lian, launched on July 16, 1920 by Taiwanese students in Tokyo as part of the growing non-violent resistance movement against Japanese colonial rule. A crucial part of the effort was to promote Taiwanese culture and identity, and create space for local voices in a Japanese-dominated media landscape.
Written in Chinese and Japanese, the staff announced in the first issue that their focus would be on self-determination, gender equality and labor rights. The content became increasingly critical of the colonial government, leading the Japanese authorities to ban five out of the 18 issues and censor parts of three more. It is considered a precursor to the influential Taiwan Minpao (台灣民報) newspaper.
The second Taiwan Youth was also anti-Japanese, founded in China in 1943 by the Taiwan Volunteers (台灣義勇隊) who aided the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during World War II. It shifted from war propaganda to Chinese patriotism after Japan’s surrender, relaunching in Taiwan on Nov. 12, 1945 — the birth anniversary of KMT founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
Photo courtesy of National Chengchi University Libraries
The final iteration, Taiwan Chinglian, was started in 1960 by exiled independence activists in Tokyo. In addition to promoting Taiwanese nationalism, it devoted significant editorial space to the 228 Incident, an anti-government uprising that was violently suppressed in 1947, which was a taboo topic under the KMT well into the 1980s. It was the longest-running out of the three, lasting 500 issues until 2002.
UNARMED RESISTANCE
While armed revolts against the Japanese by Han Taiwanese had died down by the 1920s, local intellectuals continued the fight through non-violent means.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Cultural Memory Bank
In January 1920, the first Taiwanese political activist group, the New Peoples’ Society (新民會), was inaugurated at businessman Tsai Hui-ju’s (蔡惠如) house in Tokyo. Lin Hsien-tang (林獻堂) of the prominent Wufeng Lin family served as president with Tsai as his deputy, and most members were Taiwanese students or recent graduates.
Tsai, whose business was faltering, set aside some money to launch the group’s mouthpiece, The Tai Oan Chheng Lian, hoping to at least publish three issues, writes historian Chuang Sheng-chuan (莊勝全) in a 2019 reissue of the magazine. However, some of Taiwan’s wealthiest men immediately pitched in, including Lin, Koo Hsien-jung (辜顯榮) and Yen Yun-nian (顏雲年). Tsai Pei-huo (蔡培火) served as editor-in-chief and spokesperson, with Lin Cheng-lu (林呈祿) and Peng Hua-ying (彭華英) as the main editors.
“Collecting domestic and overseas ideas and writing in Japanese and Chinese, we hope to respond to global events and follow modern trends to advance the wisdom of Taiwanese. Although we dare not claim to be the ears and eyes of Taiwanese society, we wish to serve as a harbinger of public discourse for the island’s residents,” the introduction read.
CENSORED AT HOME
The magazine gained considerable support in Japan, which was going through the post-World War I Taisho Democracy Movement. The first issue featured congratulatory calligraphy by Kenjiro Den, governor-general at the time, and contained pieces by prominent Japanese activists, scholars and politicians.
Meiji University professor Izumi Akira wrote in his piece that Taiwanese “must realize that Taiwan does not belong to the governor-general’s office, it belongs to Taiwan’s residents.” Tsai elaborated on this point in the fourth issue, adding that the government must treat Japanese, Taiwanese and indigenous living in Taiwan equally.
However, the magazine was subject to close scrutiny before being distributed in Taiwan. The first two issues were only sold in Japan due to procedural complications, and the fourth was banned for unspecified reasons.
The censors struck again in March 1921, claiming inappropriate wording. Instead of rewriting the material, the staff simply blotted out the offending parts and republished the rest wholesale. This seemed to anger the authorities, who cracked down on the magazine for the rest of the year. The magazine staff complained to the Japanese central government, and also submitted a banned article to two Japanese-run newspapers in Taiwan. Both ran it without any problems, and staff complained about the unequal treatment between Taiwanese and Japanese publications.
They also collaborated with similar publications such as the Korean Asia Kunglun, which ran in its first issue a detailed account on the suppression of The Tai Oan Chhing Lian.
While the content at first mostly revolved around building Taiwanese cultural confidence and awareness, it became increasingly critical. For example, the banned final February 1922 edition contained analysis of the Irish independence movement and criticism of the government’s monopoly on alcohol, free speech restrictions and the treatment of Taiwanese students in Japan.
GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA
The second Taiwan Youth ceased publication in China in July 1944, but was revived in Taiwan after the war under the Three Principles Youth Group (三民主義青年團), which absorbed the Taiwan Volunteers.
The woodblock print cover of the first Taiwan issue showed a young man running while reading a copy of Sun’s Three Principles of the People, with an image of Taiwan in the background. Each issue opened with words from KMT leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), and the first half contained patriotic propaganda and articles by officials and youth group leaders.
The second part featured submitted entries. Topics included “Sun Yat-sen Thought” (國父思想), national and local policy, youth issues, Taiwanese history and culture and the arts. There were travelogs, essays, op-eds, reviews, poems and artwork (mostly woodblock prints).
Historian Ho Yi-lin (何義麟) writes in a National Museum of Taiwan Literature entry that the publication ignored the fact that the majority of youth in Taiwan could not read Chinese. In fact, an article in the final edition (March 29, 1946) by Department of Education chief Fan Shou-kang (范壽康) admonished Taiwanese for clinging to the Japanese language.
“In the ensuing years, our education policy must emphasize our national literature, language and history, so that our Taiwanese compatriots can, within the shortest amount of time, be restored to their original state 50 years ago. We must eradicate all the poisoning caused by the enslaving education and obscurantist policies [by the Japanese].”
PURSUING INDEPENDENCE
The third version, Taiwan Chinglian, was run by the Taiwanese Youth Independence League. The magazine’s interest in exploring the 228 Incident was evident, as founder Ong Iok-tek (王育德) fled Taiwan after his elder brother Ong Iok-lim “disappeared” during the event’s aftermath. It’s believed that the elder Ong was targeted because he prosecuted KMT officials.
Taiwan Chinglian “was the most influential overseas Taiwanese publication in the 1960s,” states the National 228 Memorial Museum Web site. Originally published only in Japanese, it switched to Chinese in February 1976.
In 1965, it was the first to publish independence activist Peng Ming-min’s (彭明敏) “A Declaration of Formosan Self-Salvation,” as Peng was arrested before he could publicize the statement the previous year. A copy made its way to the US, which eventually led to the half-page “Formosa for Formosans” advertisement in the New York Times. This echoed The Tai Oan Chhing Lian’s Taiwan belongs to Taiwanese sentiment, but under very different circumstances.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that either have anniversaries this week or are tied to current events.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus convener Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) and some in the deep blue camp seem determined to ensure many of the recall campaigns against their lawmakers succeed. Widely known as the “King of Hualien,” Fu also appears to have become the king of the KMT. In theory, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) outranks him, but Han is supposed to be even-handed in negotiations between party caucuses — the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) says he is not — and Fu has been outright ignoring Han. Party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) isn’t taking the lead on anything while Fu
RSS