After The People’s Republic of China (PRC) published 22 new guidelines on June 21 that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death “Taiwan independence separatists,” the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) upgraded its travel advisory to the PRC and the Special Administrative Regions (SARs) of Hong Kong and Macau to level 3, or “orange” alert, meaning Taiwanese nationals shouldn’t visit unless “absolutely necessary.”
Surveying commuters in Taipei’s bustling Main Station on Thursday, the Taipei Times found only 20 percent of people we spoke to had not heard that the travel alert had been raised to orange.
Similarly, only 30 percent had not heard of a Taiwanese traveler who was briefly held in Hong Kong due to his name being similar to a former Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) legislator named Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) when Romanized.
Photo: Daniel Oh
When asked if they’d consider visiting the PRC or the two SARs for work or tourism given the current travel advisory, 70 percent of respondents said they would not, with most expressing some concern for their safety in light of current cross-strait tensions. A troubling 30 percent of respondents said they’d even been worried transferring planes in a PRC or SAR airport.
However, Chang Cheng from New Taipei City said he’d visit Hong Kong again as he’d enjoyed his time there before and had a lot of friends in the territory. Similarly, 18-year-old Lin Chung-che, who has previously visited Shanghai, said he’d happily travel to the PRC or Hong Kong, although he has no immediate plans to do so.
A retired science teacher from Taipei who identified as Joe Kuo told the Taipei Times he’d been to the PRC 20 times in the past for tourism and work but wouldn’t go now due to safety concerns.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Similarly, 70-year-old retiree Lin Yu-chuan who has visited Hangzhou, Xiamen and Shanghai in the past and describes the landscape of the PRC as “beautiful” would not visit. Lin also bemoaned Hong Kong’s reduced appeal as a destination as somewhere that was “no longer lively” and in “economic decline,” which should “serve as a warning to Taiwan.”
Alice Lin, a 27-year-old teacher in New Taipei City, said she wouldn’t go in the current climate, although she maintains a dream to visit the pandas in their home environment of Sichuan and would do so should travel safety improve.
Only half of respondents said they’d let PRC policy influence travel opportunities in Myanmar, Laos or Cambodia — Southeast Asian countries with which Beijing maintains close ties and extradition treaties.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Kuo told the Taipei Times he simply wouldn’t visit any country that was “Communist” including Vietnam and North Korea.
When asked if they were concerned if any Western countries, which currently exclude “political offenses” from their extradition with China, might align with Beijing in the future, only 30 percent agreed, with most considering Western destinations “safe” in both the short and medium term.
However, Lin Ching-yu, a 36-year-old nurse, said “politics is always changing, you have to keep an eye on it and check up-to-date government warnings.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
A freelancer from Tainan, Miss Liu, expressed concerns for any Taiwan national traveling to the Russia Federation, given Moscow’s strengthening ties with Beijing.
Of those we spoke with, only 30 percent felt they had done something that might make them a target of Beijing, including attending a Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil, arguing with PRC citizens online and gathering outside the Legislative Yuan to protest the recent reform bill.
Last week saw the appearance of another odious screed full of lies from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian (肖千), in the Financial Review, a major Australian paper. Xiao’s piece was presented without challenge or caveat. His “Seven truths on why Taiwan always will be China’s” presented a “greatest hits” of the litany of PRC falsehoods. This includes: Taiwan’s indigenous peoples were descended from the people of China 30,000 years ago; a “Chinese” imperial government administrated Taiwan in the 14th century; Koxinga, also known as Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), “recovered” Taiwan for China; the Qing owned
In Taiwan’s politics the party chair is an extremely influential position. Typically this person is the presumed presidential candidate or serving president. In the last presidential election, two of the three candidates were also leaders of their party. Only one party chair race had been planned for this year, but with the Jan. 1 resignation by the currently indicted Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) two parties are now in play. If a challenger to acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) appears we will examine that race in more depth. Currently their election is set for Feb. 15. EXTREMELY
Jan. 20 to Jan. 26 Taipei was in a jubilant, patriotic mood on the morning of Jan. 25, 1954. Flags hung outside shops and residences, people chanted anti-communist slogans and rousing music blared from loudspeakers. The occasion was the arrival of about 14,000 Chinese prisoners from the Korean War, who had elected to head to Taiwan instead of being repatriated to China. The majority landed in Keelung over three days and were paraded through the capital to great fanfare. Air Force planes dropped colorful flyers, one of which read, “You’re back, you’re finally back. You finally overcame the evil communist bandits and
They increasingly own everything from access to space to how we get news on Earth and now outgoing President Joe Biden warns America’s new breed of Donald Trump-allied oligarchs could gobble up US democracy itself. Biden used his farewell speech to the nation to deliver a shockingly dark message: that a nation which has always revered its entrepreneurs may now be at their mercy. “An oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms,” Biden said. He named no names, but his targets were clear: men like Elon Musk
RSS