After The People’s Republic of China (PRC) published 22 new guidelines on June 21 that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death “Taiwan independence separatists,” the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) upgraded its travel advisory to the PRC and the Special Administrative Regions (SARs) of Hong Kong and Macau to level 3, or “orange” alert, meaning Taiwanese nationals shouldn’t visit unless “absolutely necessary.”
Surveying commuters in Taipei’s bustling Main Station on Thursday, the Taipei Times found only 20 percent of people we spoke to had not heard that the travel alert had been raised to orange.
Similarly, only 30 percent had not heard of a Taiwanese traveler who was briefly held in Hong Kong due to his name being similar to a former Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) legislator named Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) when Romanized.
Photo: Daniel Oh
When asked if they’d consider visiting the PRC or the two SARs for work or tourism given the current travel advisory, 70 percent of respondents said they would not, with most expressing some concern for their safety in light of current cross-strait tensions. A troubling 30 percent of respondents said they’d even been worried transferring planes in a PRC or SAR airport.
However, Chang Cheng from New Taipei City said he’d visit Hong Kong again as he’d enjoyed his time there before and had a lot of friends in the territory. Similarly, 18-year-old Lin Chung-che, who has previously visited Shanghai, said he’d happily travel to the PRC or Hong Kong, although he has no immediate plans to do so.
A retired science teacher from Taipei who identified as Joe Kuo told the Taipei Times he’d been to the PRC 20 times in the past for tourism and work but wouldn’t go now due to safety concerns.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Similarly, 70-year-old retiree Lin Yu-chuan who has visited Hangzhou, Xiamen and Shanghai in the past and describes the landscape of the PRC as “beautiful” would not visit. Lin also bemoaned Hong Kong’s reduced appeal as a destination as somewhere that was “no longer lively” and in “economic decline,” which should “serve as a warning to Taiwan.”
Alice Lin, a 27-year-old teacher in New Taipei City, said she wouldn’t go in the current climate, although she maintains a dream to visit the pandas in their home environment of Sichuan and would do so should travel safety improve.
Only half of respondents said they’d let PRC policy influence travel opportunities in Myanmar, Laos or Cambodia — Southeast Asian countries with which Beijing maintains close ties and extradition treaties.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Kuo told the Taipei Times he simply wouldn’t visit any country that was “Communist” including Vietnam and North Korea.
When asked if they were concerned if any Western countries, which currently exclude “political offenses” from their extradition with China, might align with Beijing in the future, only 30 percent agreed, with most considering Western destinations “safe” in both the short and medium term.
However, Lin Ching-yu, a 36-year-old nurse, said “politics is always changing, you have to keep an eye on it and check up-to-date government warnings.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
A freelancer from Tainan, Miss Liu, expressed concerns for any Taiwan national traveling to the Russia Federation, given Moscow’s strengthening ties with Beijing.
Of those we spoke with, only 30 percent felt they had done something that might make them a target of Beijing, including attending a Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil, arguing with PRC citizens online and gathering outside the Legislative Yuan to protest the recent reform bill.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS