When it comes to vehicles hitting pedestrians, the blanket term “accident” doesn’t cut it for the activists behind Vision Zero Taiwan.
“We have … mistaken accident for acts of nature, forgetting their human-made origin,” reads the text for an event on Saturday organized by the group to commemorate victims of “traffic violence.”
As part of the Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims in Taiwan, demonstrators will gather at 6pm in busy districts in Taipei, Hsinchu, Taichung and Kaohsiung. Participants will walk along an assigned route to commemorate the 3,023 people who lost their lives on Taiwan’s roads last year.
Photo courtesy of Vision Zero Taiwan
“Taiwanese have become accustomed to viewing traffic deaths and injuries as … something to be resigned to as bad luck,” the text for the event explains.
However, most accidents are “preventable and avoidable.”
Established in 1995 in Sweden, Vision Zero, has become a multinational traffic safety initiative. A guiding principle of the project is that the life and health of citizens should not be traded for other social benefits. Many Vision Zero measures have been adopted by governments in countries and cities around the world.
Photo courtesy of Vision Zero Taiwan
WIDESPREAD ATTENTION
As one of the main organizers of Vision Zero Taiwan, YC Wu (吳宜蒨) played a key role in getting Taiwan’s Executive Yuan to approve a set of guidelines on pedestrian safety drafted by the Ministry of the Interior last year.
Following two incidents in which she was hit by cars while crossing roads in Taipei, Wu was diagnosed with PTSD and left fearful of walking in the city.
“I realized that I was not the only one who suffered physically and mentally because of traffic, but no one wanted to stand up and speak out,” she tells the Taipei Times.
Gathering a group of likeminded partners together, Wu organized “the first march on pedestrian rights in Taiwan’s history,” in August last year. The protest, which was held under the provocative banner “stop killing pedestrians” took place on Taipei’s Ketagalan Boulevard. It drew considerable media coverage and even the attention of the political top brass.
“I didn’t expect that all presidential candidates would show up,” says Wu. The groundswell of support piled pressure on the government to approve a higher-level set of policy guidelines for pedestrian traffic safety to be implemented from last year to 2027. The guidelines include three main initiatives: the enactment of a basic act for road traffic safety; measures to encourage greater use of public transportation; and the implementation of improvements to pedestrian safety.
“Getting the government [to agree] to pass a basic act of traffic safety in Taiwan, was beyond my wildest expectations,” says Wu.
CONTRADICTORY POLICIES
As the first step of this plan, a draft bill on sidewalk safety measures was submitted to the Legislative Yuan on March 7. However, there are concerns that this positive action could be a case of one step forward and two steps back: On the same day, the Cabinet announced approval of a separate bill from the Ministry of Transportation and Communications to reduce fines for “minor” infractions, including riding scooters on sidewalks.
Considering the reference in the Ministry of the Interior initiatives to “heavier traffic fines … for key traffic violations,” the two policies appear contradictory.
“The [MOI] seems to have more political will to improve the situation,” says Yi-xian (一閑), an activist with Vision Zero Taiwan who prefers to use only her given name.
She notes that, worldwide, many cities that have implemented Vision Zero principles on “physical road interventions” such as lane narrowing and 30-kph speed limits, have seen a significant reduction in traffic casualties.
“Our concern is that, since it is only a concept and lacks any binding force, if governments do not have the political will or courage to adopt measures already established in other regions, it will remain merely an empty slogan,” she says.
Such fears have motivated activists to take concrete action. Last weekend saw Vision Zero Taiwan and other advocacy groups for pedestrian and disabled rights organize flash mob protests islandwide. Saturday’s remembrance events are aimed at emphasizing the human element in the equation.
“We have long forgotten that casualty statistics represent lives lost, not just numbers,” reads the statement for the event.
OVERTON WINDOW
Participants in Saturday’s memorial walks will be given electronic candles to carry. A moment’s silence will be held to honor those who have lost their lives on Taiwan’s roads. Following this vigil, people will be invited to fold white paper cranes and “share stories of the trauma and pain caused by the violence embedded in our transportation system.”
Jonathan Knowles, a long-term British resident of Taiwan, who helped organize Saturday’s event and last year’s protest, refers to the “Overton window of discourse regarding the inevitability of traffic deaths and injuries in Taiwan.”
The Overton window refers to the range of policies that are considered acceptable by the public at any given time.
“While many campaigns focus on reducing casualties, we wanted ours to plant the idea in people’s minds that there is a possible future in which all road deaths are a thing of the past,” he says.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS