Recently, in the Philippines, former president Rodrigo Duterte has been on the warpath against current President Bongbong Marcos. During his tenure Duterte was close to Beijing, while Marcos has returned the Philippines to its traditional alliance with the US.
Last week local newspapers reported that Duterte had called for a “separate, independent” Mindanao, referring to the island province in the south. The cleavage between the largely Tagalog speaking north and the largely Visaya speaking south is an old one in Philippine politics, but the leadership of Duterte, a southerner and Visaya speaker, suggests a new element has entered the fray: the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Indeed, a prominent Filipino military blogger immediately began claiming that he had heard from sources in the Marcos administration that the PRC was urging Duterte and his family members to destabilize the administration and retake power. True or not, it is clear that a major push for independence for the region would be a gift to Beijing, another cleavage to exploit.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
Of late the Philippines has become the flashpoint everyone says Taiwan already is, with the ships of the Philippines, a formal treaty ally of the US, clashing regularly with PRC vessels. Beijing may not be planning a war, but that doesn’t mean it won’t trigger one.
PACIFIC GREAT GAME
Across the Asia-Pacific region Beijing is exploiting democratic structures to advance its influence by enlarging cleavages. As of this writing it was looking like Taiwan is about to lose Tuvalu after the recent election there. The PRC poached Nauru, timing the announcement for after the Jan. 13 elections, though the capture of Nauru was primarily aimed at Australia.
Photo: AFP
Mindanao is not the only region with potential to break away from its current sovereign. Bougainville, a group of two major islands with associated atolls and smaller islets, is currently struggling for independence from Papua New Guinea. The island’s export earner, one of the largest copper mines on earth, was closed in 1989 after locals shut it down due to its environmental and social effects. A few years ago Beijing offered to finance the new state, which otherwise would be destitute.
Similarly, in 2019 the Solomon Islands, neighbors to Bougainville, switched from Taiwan to the PRC, another move in the Great Game in the Pacific. Solomons sits astride Australia’s communications with the US and with East Asia, including its telecoms cables. The PRC and Solomons signed a security agreement in 2022 that gave Beijing the right to replenish its ships in local ports and to conduct aerial surveillance off the islands and of Australia. It also allows the Solomons to call on the PRC in case of local unrest, a role that had previously been given to Australia.
JUNKETS TO CHINA
PRC tactics are the same everywhere. Prior to the presidential election a number of local officials from Kaohsiung and Chiayi were indicted for taking trips to China organized and paid for by PRC officials. Just after the election the news broke of trips to China by city mayors from the US, part of PRC operations to court US local officials. In both cases the PRC was seeking local links it could use against the central government.
Taiwan offers numerous such cleavages for Beijing to exploit. The north-south split is well known, yet the PRC approach to local officials in the south shows how the south may be green at the national level, but at the local level, it remains a blue-green checkerboard.
Occasionally, one even hears proposals that Taipei could be split off from the rest of Taiwan as Northern Ireland is from Ireland. As a Taichung person, I consider it only humane to oppose this. The poor citizens of the Celestial Dragon Kingdom should not be required to own a passport just to enjoy decent weather.
CLASS AND GENERATIONAL CLEAVAGES
Taiwan is also afflicted with class and generational cleavages, brought into sharp focus by the election. For example, during the election it was reported that TikTok was rife with videos pushing Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). Beijing probably preferred Ko to William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate (who would go on to win), but more importantly, it sought to generate cleavages in Taiwan’s society.
The TPP drew a large chunk of its support from young males who felt they weren’t making enough money. This cleavage will only grow as wealth continues to accrue to older asset holders and real estate investors. Interestingly, some recent research is showing a divergence between the politics of young males, who are becoming more right wing, and females, who are becoming more progressive, across several developed nations. I do not know of any research finding this in Taiwan, but the structure of support for Ko is suggestive of future trends. It could well grow into a major cleavage between the sexes as it currently is in South Korea. As I have observed before, Taiwan’s salaries and working hours are a critical national security issues.
Deployment of TikTok in the service of Beijing shows another cleavage, between savvy and ignorant Internet users. Line groups are rife with Beijing propaganda. Social media still puts users in silos. Conspiracy thinking abounds.
The reach and power of Beijing is so great that almost anywhere in society it can act effectively to widen divisions, making the maintenance of Taiwan’s still strong social cohesion an urgent national security issue. The military with its deep blue officer corps, businesses that do business across the strait and those who don’t. Big business and small. All these divisions are weak points.
LEGISLATIVE SPEAKER
Another cleavage was highlighted on Thursday when Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won the election for legislative speaker: the divide between parties and politicians willing to work for Taiwan’s future, and those just cynically struggling to stay in power.
Congratulations, Ko voters. You got what you voted for and you can’t say you weren’t warned. Meanwhile the DPP apparently decided to let Han likely make the legislature useless rather than give the legislative presidency to the TPP and increase that party’s odds of survival.
Turnout in the last election was excellent and voters remain committed to democracy. But how long can that continue if voters repeatedly experience that greatest gulf of all: the abyss of disappointment between change desired and status quo delivered?
It will not be difficult for Beijing to exploit that cleavage.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS