It reads like a complex K-drama plot. South Korea’s first lady is secretly filmed as she’s presented with a lavish gift from a pastor who advocates for unification with North Korea. But this is no scripted narrative, rather a real political crisis that has plunged South Korea’s conservative government into disarray.
With elections for the country’s national assembly less than three months away, South Korean media is awash with accusations and recriminations — all of which stem from the alleged gift of a Dior handbag more than a year ago.
The turmoil began with a meeting between Korean-American pastor Choi Jae-young and Kim Keon Hee, the wife of president Yoon Suk Yeol.
Photo: Reuters
Choi has a history of engagement with the North and has visited the communist country several times to conduct prayers at Pyongyang’s handful of state-operated churches.
He says he was motivated by a desire to “share advice” on matters related to unification with the current administration, and so approached first lady Kim, cultivating a relationship with her which culminated in a one-on-one meeting in 2022, just months after her husband became president.
ABUSE OF POWER?
During this meeting, Choi claims that he overheard Kim engaged in a phone conversation which touched upon sensitive state affairs. Alarmed by the nature of the alleged discussion, he decided to secretly record their next meeting, employing a spy camera concealed within a wristwatch.
Accusations of abuse of power are no laughing matter in South Korea: the former conservative president, Park Geun-hye, was impeached and imprisoned for corruption, before being pardoned by her successor.
It was during the course of Choi’s second meeting with Kim that he purportedly presented her with a Dior bag valued at 3 million won (US$2,240). Both the bag and the concealed camera were provided by the left-leaning news site Voice of Seoul, which is known for its staunch opposition to the Yoon government.
Voice of Seoul released the video at the end of November. In it, the first lady is seen in discussion with Choi who tells Kim that he’s brought a present, to which she replies “Why do you keep purchasing such items? Please don’t buy such expensive things.”
Although the transfer of the Dior bag to Kim is not apparent, it continues to be placed on the table in her presence.
Speaking to foreign media, Choi said he was purely driven by the public’s right to know about alleged corruption. He claims that he messaged Kim in advance, notifying her that he was bringing the bag and that there were no attempts to refuse it or return it later.
The potential legal repercussions are ambiguous: anti-graft laws prohibit a public official’s spouse from receiving gifts worth more than 1 million won (US$748) in one sitting, but this must be “in connection with the duties of the public official.”
At the same time, Choi himself is facing criticism from supporters of the president who say the ploy is an attempt to influence the election.
The Guardian could not independently verify the video or Choi’s claims, however the anti-corruption agency said it was investigating the case. To date, there has been no official statement from the presidential office.
CONTROVERSIAL FIRST LADY
Kim Keon Hee is no stranger to controversy, having weathered a series of allegations, including plagiarism concerning her academic writings, resume-padding and accusations of stock manipulation.
The controversies have proven a headache and a source of embarrassment for her husband. Earlier in January, Yoon vetoed a bill that would have authorized a special investigation into his wife’s alleged involvement in stock manipulation.
With South Korea’s general election scheduled for April 10, both major political parties are going all out to secure support. Neither party enjoys significant public favor, and both sides are grappling with their own internal power struggles. It’s within this context that the emerging handbag scandal could not have come at a worse time for the country’s deeply unpopular president.
In a poll released by a local news channel, 69 percent of respondents said Yoon needs to explain his position regarding the controversy around the first lady. Another poll in December showed 53 percent of respondents believe Kim acted inappropriately, while 27 percent said she was caught in a trap set up to embarrass her.
“It is a political bombshell,” said Rhee Jong-hoon, a political analyst. “The Kim Keon Hee risks are only going to get bigger.”
Loyalists of the president have dismissed the bag scandal as a smear campaign. But some members of his ruling People Power party have advocated for an apology and the party’s interim leader, Han Dong-hoon, has acknowledged that the controversy might be “a matter of public concern.”
Last week Han — who until recently served as justice minister and was widely regarded as Yoon’s closest aide — stated that while the Dior bag scandal was a “planned set-up using a spy camera … there were several misdeeds in handling the issues.”
Tension between Yoon’s office and his party threatened to boil over last week when a senior member likened the situation to the notoriety of Marie Antoinette, the French Queen known for her profligacy.
With apparent disagreement on how to handle the problem at the top of the ruling party, the internal disarray came to a head on Sunday, when senior members of Yoon’s office met with Han and suggested he resign. Han refused.
The unfolding drama is not going down well with major conservative media who are typically sympathetic to the president, with the upheaval being described as a potential “risk” for the ruling party in the run-up to the elections.
“As long as it is true that first lady Kim received a luxury bag, she cannot escape the criticism of the people. If President Yoon had apologized from the beginning … things would not have escalated to this extent,” the influential Chosun Ilbo said in an editorial on Tuesday.
“He didn’t, and the problem has now reached the worst possible situation.”
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
JUNE 30 to JULY 6 After being routed by the Japanese in the bloody battle of Baguashan (八卦山), Hsu Hsiang (徐驤) and a handful of surviving Hakka fighters sped toward Tainan. There, he would meet with Liu Yung-fu (劉永福), leader of the Black Flag Army who had assumed control of the resisting Republic of Formosa after its president and vice-president fled to China. Hsu, who had been fighting non-stop for over two months from Taoyuan to Changhua, was reportedly injured and exhausted. As the story goes, Liu advised that Hsu take shelter in China to recover and regroup, but Hsu steadfastly
You can tell a lot about a generation from the contents of their cool box: nowadays the barbecue ice bucket is likely to be filled with hard seltzers, non-alcoholic beers and fluorescent BuzzBallz — a particular favorite among Gen Z. Two decades ago, it was WKD, Bacardi Breezers and the odd Smirnoff Ice bobbing in a puddle of melted ice. And while nostalgia may have brought back some alcopops, the new wave of ready-to-drink (RTD) options look and taste noticeably different. It is not just the drinks that have changed, but drinking habits too, driven in part by more health-conscious consumers and
On Sunday, President William Lai (賴清德) delivered a strategically brilliant speech. It was the first of his “Ten Lectures on National Unity,” (團結國家十講) focusing on the topic of “nation.” Though it has been eclipsed — much to the relief of the opposing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — by an ill-advised statement in the second speech of the series, the days following Lai’s first speech were illuminating on many fronts, both domestic and internationally, in highlighting the multi-layered success of Lai’s strategic move. “OF COURSE TAIWAN IS A COUNTRY” Never before has a Taiwanese president devoted an entire speech to