Like most young South Koreans, Annie Ko rarely ate dog meat, but her annual visits to a restaurant serving the dish did little to trouble her conscience. And she was only vaguely aware of the international criticism that led to last week’s vote to ban the breeding, slaughter and sale of dog meat in the country.
It was when she volunteered as an interpreter for Humane Society International that her views on eating dog meat — a tradition some claim goes back centuries — changed dramatically.
Her volunteer work took her to farms that breed dogs for slaughter, their meat eventually ending up in stews and other dishes that devotees claim help fend off fatigue caused by the country’s hot and humid summers.
Photo: AFP
Then she adopted DeeJay, who had been rescued from a dog farm.
“I’d had a year or two to witness what actually goes on at dog farms before I got my dog … it was an important learning experience,” said Ko, a member of the Seoul-based electric rock duo Love X Stereo.
“When you’re at a restaurant, you don’t really see the process, but that changes once you’re at a farm and see how horrible the situation is, how badly the dogs are treated and how they carry all these diseases … stuff that makes you feel that this is wrong in so many ways.”
Photo: AFP
Over the years, activists have documented the cruelty of the industry. Dogs are subjected to deplorable conditions, confined to cages amid putrid surroundings infested with diseases and faeces, and often left with untreated wounds. They are fed discarded food waste, often containing harmful ingredients. They are strangulated by hanging, beaten or even electrocuted, sometimes over prolonged periods.
Breeders, many of whom are older and see the dog meat trade as a way out of poverty, argue that conditions have improved in recent times.
‘THE POLITICAL NARRATIVE CHANGED’
Photo: AFP
Despite the horrors highlighted by campaigners, few politicians appeared willing to act. Consumption has been in decline for decades and is now largely confined to older South Koreans who want a fix of culinary nostalgia. But the industry is no financial minnow. There are about 1,150 farms, while 1,600 restaurants sell dog meat dishes, according to the agriculture ministry. Activists say as many as 1 million dogs a year are slaughtered.
In 2022, activists found an unlikely ally in the incoming president Yoon Suk-yeol and his wife, Kim Keon-hee.
Voters knew that Yoon, a conservative, would take a tougher stance on North Korea’s nuclear program and attempt to roll back the progressive domestic policies of his liberal predecessor, Moon Jae-in. But no one identified him as an ally in the campaign that culminated in the national assembly’s recent decision to make the dog meat trade illegal from 2027.
Yoon and Kim, who own several dogs, had made no secret of their opposition to dog meat consumption. According to government data, there are more than 6 million pet dogs in South Korea, and demand for dog meat is at an all-time low. A recent Korea Research International opinion poll commissioned by the animal rights group Aware found 93 percent of people had no intention of eating dog meat, while 82 percent supported a ban, up from 73 percent in 2022.
In the national assembly, 208 voted for the ban, with just two abstentions.
“The political narrative changed very quickly,” Ko said. “And I think that has a lot to do with the current government.”
The agriculture minister, Song Mi-ryung, said criminalizing the trade reflected South Korea’s transformation into a society that prioritizes animal welfare.
“Now is the time for the government to take action to swiftly resolve the issue of dog meat consumption,” she said.
Many have credited Moon, who was president from 2017-22, with boosting the campaign against the trade. In 2017, he adopted Tori, a rescue dog, and four years later suggested the time had come to ban the consumption of dog meat.
ANIMALS AS COMPANIONS
The law includes a three-year grace period before the ban comes into effect, and financial help for breeders, but many in the industry condemned it as an attack on their way of life.
Joo Young-bong, the head of a nationwide association of dog meat farmers, said producers were in a “state of despair.”
“Prohibiting what people eat has no precedent in history,” Joo said in a radio interview. “People have recovered their health and improved their wellbeing after eating dog meat. We are aware that consumption has been falling, but it is absurd to ban people from eating what they like. It feels like we’ve become a ‘dog republic.’ There are more people walking around with dogs than there are holding babies.”
Kim Dong-hyun, a Seoul-based filmmaker and owner of a Maltese dog, had doubts about condemning the entire industry.
“I don’t think old practices will die out that easily,” he said. “The focus should be on fostering better conditions and removing the cruelty element for these animals rather than outright opposition. At the same time, I wonder if this is realistic when some say that beating a dog to death makes it taste better.”
Others said the law would end widespread suffering.
“Like many of my friends, I was tricked into eating dog meat as a child,” said Kim Seo-hyun, a student in Gyeonggi province. “Older generations say it’s good for our health, but knowing the cruel way dogs are treated makes me sick, and I am happy it is finally being banned.”
Ko acknowledged that dog meat was a source of protein after the war, when millions of Koreans battled poverty and malnutrition. “Dogs were everywhere then, so I think they were an obvious choice,” she said. “But these days, people want animals as companions.”
If you are a Western and especially a white foreign resident of Taiwan, you’ve undoubtedly had the experience of Taiwanese assuming you to be an English teacher. There are cultural and economic reasons for this, but one of the greatest determinants is the narrow range of work permit categories that exist for Taiwan’s foreign residents, which has in turn created an unofficial caste system for foreigners. Until recently, laowai (老外) — the Mandarin term for “foreigners,” which also implies citizenship in a rich, Western country and distinguishable from brown-skinned, southeast Asian migrant laborers, or wailao (外勞) — could only ever
Sept. 23 to Sept. 29 The construction of the Babao Irrigation Canal (八堡圳) was not going well. Large-scale irrigation structures were almost unheard of in Taiwan in 1709, but Shih Shih-pang (施世榜) was determined to divert water from the Jhuoshuei River (濁水溪) to the Changhua plain, where he owned land, to promote wet rice cultivation. According to legend, a mysterious old man only known as Mr. Lin (林先生) appeared and taught Shih how to use woven conical baskets filled with rocks called shigou (石笱) to control water diversion, as well as other techniques such as surveying terrain by observing shadows during
In recent weeks news outlets have been reporting on rising rents. Last year they hit a 27 year high. It seems only a matter of time before they become a serious political issue. Fortunately, there is a whole political party that is laser focused on this issue, the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP). They could have had a seat or two in the legislature, or at least, be large enough to attract media attention to the rent issue from time to time. Unfortunately, in the last election, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) acted as a vote sink for
This is a film about two “fools,” according to the official synopsis. But admirable ones. In his late thirties, A-jen quits his high-paying tech job and buys a plot of land in the countryside, hoping to use municipal trash to revitalize the soil that has been contaminated by decades of pesticide and chemical fertilizer use. Brother An-ho, in his 60s, on the other hand, began using organic methods to revive the dead soil on his land 30 years ago despite the ridicule of his peers, methodically picking each pest off his produce by hand without killing them out of respect