A TikTok tarot card reader gazes at me through the screen and draws a card.
“If you’re seeing this,” she coos, “it was meant for you.” And in a sense, she’s right. But it wasn’t fate that brought me here, it was an algorithm.
Spirituality and mysticism have long found a home online, but the rise of generative AI and personalized content recommender systems are making it easier than ever to project a sense of magic upon technology.
Photo: AP
As the Arthur C Clarke quote goes: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
Anyone who has been served content that feels eerily perfect for them might have wondered at the mysterious omnipotence of The Algorithm. And while there’s nothing inherently wrong with experiencing a sense of wonder in the face of technological advancement, or even using digital technologies to enhance a spiritual practice, collapsing magic and technology can be risky.
‘ASK THE STARS’
Photo: Reuters
Off the back of OpenAI’s large language model GPT-4, many religious and spiritual spinoff chatbots have emerged. You can get BibleGPT to write personalized Christian poetry, use Jesus AI to, as the website claims, have “meaningful conversations with Jesus Christ” and chat with WitchGPT about paganism.
“Welcome to the void” beckons the popular astrology app CoStar in its own latest chatbot feature, encouraging users to seek generated guidance for a fee of about US$1 per question. Choosing from a list of suggested prompts, I “Ask the Stars” if I have a secret admirer. “No,” it tells me (rude).
In true CoStar fashion (the app is famously sassy) it also rebukes me for having asked the question at all, suggesting I should instead find gratitude in what I already have.
These examples are at best a bit silly and probably harmless. At worst, they reveal grifters out to make a buck by manufacturing a sense of insight or enlightenment by leveraging the human tendency to anthropomorphize technology or by gaming social media engagement algorithms.
But among the chaff there are also people forming genuine spiritual communities and engaging in witchcraft and other sacred traditions online. As with many subcultures, social media can be both a blessing and a curse: it can enable otherwise disparate groups to connect, but can also lead to the diminishment or adulteration of cultural practices.
Feminist anthropologist Emma Quilty, who has forthcoming books on magic and technology, makes a distinction between those that focus on the collective and those that push a “neoliberal spirituality” which aligns itself with hyper-individualistic ideas of self-improvement.
This edges uncomfortably close to commercialized forms of self-care, utterly divorced from its Black radical feminist roots and redirected towards a capitalist cooption of wellness. Quilty highlights how trends fueled by social media can also result in practices becoming detached from the (usually eastern) religious traditions and cultures they are imported from, and in some cases lead to unsustainable market demand for products such as crystals and white sage smudge sticks.
None of this is to say that it’s impossible to develop meaningful spiritual communities and practices online nor that it’s impossible to have a profound experience using digital tools.
I’m not interested in dismissing where and how people derive meaning. Yet it’s important to remember that technologies including large language models and personalized recommender systems are ultimately designed to generate value from their users.
Any profound experience from these tools comes from us — the humans — not the tool. As Quilty notes: “Something can be positive, helpful or even empowering on an individual level, but can still be harmful at a broader societal level, because of the underlying interests and imperatives of those building and implementing the technology.”
MAGIC AND TECH
Indeed we can get into treacherous waters pretty quickly when we misattribute magic to technology. It plays right into the hands of companies that would rather us be awestruck by a shiny user interface and smooth convenience and not peep behind the curtain to reveal a crotchety old man holding things together with overblown marketing language and regular old profit-driven data extraction.
When magical thinking about technology spreads to the level of policymaking, it can become dangerous. Too often governments and companies alike are quick to turn to technology as a silver-bullet solution to complex social problems. And when the real limitations and consequences of technologies are ignored — such as how automation can exacerbate social inequalities, or how
ChatGPT couldn’t function without stealing copyrighted material, or that automated content moderation relies on exploited invisible workers — we end up with policy that fails to rein in the worst of tech’s ails and relegates the more complex but necessary policy interventions to the background, all overshadowed by the magical allure of technology.
Technology isn’t a cure-all for social ills, and can, when misused for personal gain, cause great harm — just like magic.
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
While Americans face the upcoming second Donald Trump presidency with bright optimism/existential dread in Taiwan there are also varying opinions on what the impact will be here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump personally and his first administration, US-Taiwan relations blossomed. Relative to the previous Obama administration, arms sales rocketed from US$14 billion during Obama’s eight years to US$18 billion in four years under Trump. High-profile visits by administration officials, bipartisan Congressional delegations, more and higher-level government-to-government direct contacts were all increased under Trump, setting the stage and example for the Biden administration to follow. However, Trump administration secretary
In mid-1949 George Kennan, the famed geopolitical thinker and analyst, wrote a memorandum on US policy towards Taiwan and Penghu, then known as, respectively, Formosa and the Pescadores. In it he argued that Formosa and Pescadores would be lost to the Chine communists in a few years, or even months, because of the deteriorating situation on the islands, defeating the US goal of keeping them out of Communist Chinese hands. Kennan contended that “the only reasonably sure chance of denying Formosa and the Pescadores to the Communists” would be to remove the current Chinese administration, establish a neutral administration and
A “meta” detective series in which a struggling Asian waiter becomes the unlikely hero of a police procedural-style criminal conspiracy, Interior Chinatown satirizes Hollywood’s stereotypical treatment of minorities — while also nodding to the progress the industry has belatedly made. The new show, out on Disney-owned Hulu next Tuesday, is based on the critically adored novel by US author Charles Yu (游朝凱), who is of Taiwanese descent. Yu’s 2020 bestseller delivered a humorous takedown of racism in US society through the adventures of Willis Wu, a Hollywood extra reduced to playing roles like “Background Oriental Male” but who dreams of one day
RSS