Every day, nearly 60 fully loaded very large crude-oil carriers sail between the Persian Gulf and Chinese ports, carrying about half of the oil that powers the world’s second-largest economy.
As the vessels enter the South China Sea, they ply waters increasingly controlled by China’s growing military, from the missile batteries and airfields at its bases on disputed islands to its stealthy Type 055 destroyers.
But when crossing the Indian Ocean, joined by others headed to China from Africa and Brazil, these tankers lack protection in a naval theater dominated by the US.
Photo: Reuters
A dozen military attaches and scholars say that vulnerability is now being scrutinized as Western military and academic strategists discreetly game scenarios about how a conflict with China over Taiwan, or elsewhere in East Asia, could evolve or escalate.
In a major war, Chinese oil tankers in the Indian Ocean “would find themselves very vulnerable,” said David Brewster, a security scholar at the Australian National University.
“Chinese naval vessels would effectively be trapped in the Indian Ocean and ... they would have little or no air support, because there are no bases or facilities of its own that (China) could rely on.”
Four envoys and eight analysts familiar with discussions in Western and Asian capitals, some speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic, said this enduring weakness gives China’s adversaries a ladder of escalatory options, especially in a drawn-out conflict, like Russia’s war on Ukraine.
These scenarios range from harassment and interdiction operations against Chinese shipping that could divert Chinese naval vessels to the region, up to a blockade and beyond.
In a full-scale war, the tankers — capable of carrying 2 million barrels of oil — would be prizes to be sunk or captured, reflecting naval actions of last century in which combatants targeted their enemies’ economic resources, three analysts said.
These options could be used to dissuade China from launching action, or later to raise costs on an invasion of Taiwan.
Less clear is how this vulnerability shifts Beijing’s calculations toward Taiwan, the people said.
China’s defense ministry did not respond to questions about its position in the Indian Ocean.
Chinese strategists are aware of the problem but ultimately any decision to launch military action would be taken by President Xi Jinping (習近平), according to People’s Liberation Army (PLA) documents and retired officers.
Xi has instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027, US Central Intelligence Agency Director William Burns said in February. China has been increasing military manoeuvers ahead of the nation’s elections in January.
Since taking power in 2013, Xi and other Communist Party leaders have stressed the importance of a modernized military that can project power globally and secure China’s vital trade routes.
But amid fears of conflict, some of the analysts said China would struggle to protect these lifelines even as its energy demands increase, making a protracted war over Taiwan difficult to sustain.
China imported 515.65 million tons of crude oil in the 11 months through last month, or 11.27 million barrels per day, official data show, an annual increase of 12.1 percent.
The Pentagon estimates about 62 percent of China’s oil and 17 percent of its natural gas imports transit the Malacca Strait and South China Sea, key Indian Ocean gateways.
China is moving to diversify supplies, with three pipelines from Russia, Myanmar and Kazakhstan accounting for roughly 10 percent of its crude-oil imports last year, according to customs data and state media.
Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine have also led China to stockpile more cheap oil from Russia, its top supplier.
Food is a more complex picture. China’s soybean imports — used for animal feed — are shipped in part via the Indian Ocean but other commodities such as potash, needed for fertilizer, arrive via other routes.
BASE SURROUNDED
China has an extensive network of military satellites but just one dedicated military base, and no air cover from land or sea, for Indian Ocean naval deployments.
In its October annual report on China’s military, the Pentagon lists 11 potential Chinese bases on the ocean’s fringes, including Pakistan, Tanzania and Sri Lanka. Those locations reflect Chinese diplomatic and commercial outreach under Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative.
But these have not emerged as hard military assets, with neither a permanent PLA presence nor publicly known guarantees of access in a conflict, the attaches and an Asian diplomat said.
The Pentagon report notes, in language used for the first time this year, that China still “has little power projection capability” in the Indian Ocean.
China’s initial overseas base in Djibouti, on the ocean’s western edge, opened in 2017 and hosts 400 marines, reflecting Chinese involvement in international piracy patrols around the Horn of Africa since 2008.
But the base has no airfield and is flanked by military facilities of seven other countries, including the US, France and Britain.
The US Indian Ocean presence remains in stark contrast, reflecting its Cold War build-up.
The US 5th Fleet is based in Bahrain while the Japan-headquartered 7th Fleet operates out of Diego Garcia, a UK-administered atoll with runways for long-range bombers and a lagoon adapted to house US aircraft carriers.
To the east, Australia is increasing patrols using its submarine-hunting P-8 Poseidon aircraft and is expanding a west-coast base for British and US nuclear-powered submarines and, eventually, Australian nuclear-powered boats.
WORK IN PROGRESS
Zhou Bo, a retired PLA senior colonel and a security fellow at Beijing’s Tsinghua University, said he was aware of foreign debates about China’s vulnerabilities but the scenarios were hypothetical.
Should China and the West clash militarily in the Indian Ocean, such a conflict by nature would be “almost uncontrollable” in scale and location, Zhou said.
“At that point it is a major war involving a lot of countries,” he said.
Still, he said, China would gradually expand deployments and basing options to strengthen its position.
Military attaches and analysts tracking Indian Ocean deployments say China generally maintains four or five surveillance vessels and a similar number of warships and an attack submarine at any time. But China is yet to test its most potent assets in the Indian Ocean, one former Western intelligence analyst said.
Some analysts expect that to change, particularly as PLA documents stress the piracy patrols’ importance in protecting Indian Ocean supply lines. China could expand patrols if “hegemonic countries” exercise control over its vital transit routes, according to the 2020 Science of Military Strategy, an official paper outlining China’s strategic priorities.
While China’s navy keeps its nuclear-armed ballistic-missile submarines near their Hainan Island base, its attack submarines are expected to range more widely as they improve, a challenge to the US.
“We can see they are being cautious, definitely more cautious than expected,” said retired US Rear Admiral Michael McDevitt, who in a 2020 book predicted an eventual major Chinese military presence to protect Indian Ocean sea lanes.
“I’m not saying they are not going to get there, but it does seem they are not comfortable yet, particularly with their aircraft carriers - and extending air cover will be vital for them in a conflict.”
Last week saw the appearance of another odious screed full of lies from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian (肖千), in the Financial Review, a major Australian paper. Xiao’s piece was presented without challenge or caveat. His “Seven truths on why Taiwan always will be China’s” presented a “greatest hits” of the litany of PRC falsehoods. This includes: Taiwan’s indigenous peoples were descended from the people of China 30,000 years ago; a “Chinese” imperial government administrated Taiwan in the 14th century; Koxinga, also known as Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), “recovered” Taiwan for China; the Qing owned
In Taiwan’s politics the party chair is an extremely influential position. Typically this person is the presumed presidential candidate or serving president. In the last presidential election, two of the three candidates were also leaders of their party. Only one party chair race had been planned for this year, but with the Jan. 1 resignation by the currently indicted Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) two parties are now in play. If a challenger to acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) appears we will examine that race in more depth. Currently their election is set for Feb. 15. EXTREMELY
Jan. 20 to Jan. 26 Taipei was in a jubilant, patriotic mood on the morning of Jan. 25, 1954. Flags hung outside shops and residences, people chanted anti-communist slogans and rousing music blared from loudspeakers. The occasion was the arrival of about 14,000 Chinese prisoners from the Korean War, who had elected to head to Taiwan instead of being repatriated to China. The majority landed in Keelung over three days and were paraded through the capital to great fanfare. Air Force planes dropped colorful flyers, one of which read, “You’re back, you’re finally back. You finally overcame the evil communist bandits and
They increasingly own everything from access to space to how we get news on Earth and now outgoing President Joe Biden warns America’s new breed of Donald Trump-allied oligarchs could gobble up US democracy itself. Biden used his farewell speech to the nation to deliver a shockingly dark message: that a nation which has always revered its entrepreneurs may now be at their mercy. “An oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms,” Biden said. He named no names, but his targets were clear: men like Elon Musk
RSS