In central Taiwan, a friend informs me, there’s a major business man, definitely not a gangster, who also has operations in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Before the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took over in 2016, he had plans to hand out “student” visas for “internships” for his young workers in the PRC, who would then come here for “study.” They would provide him with free labor for his entertainment operations here, and then return to the PRC to work in his businesses there.
Recently Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) announced that he would open the gates to Chinese students. The visa program already suffers from egregious systemic abuses and lax oversight, as repeated cases of non-white students used as factory labor show. With Hou in power, this might well become institutionalized. And people like the businessman above will benefit.
I have written elsewhere how presidential candidates Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and Hou have used the 2008 and 2012 approach of former President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the KMT to try and appeal to local voters while maintaining their deep blue identity (Taipei Times, “The ‘services pact’ rises from its grave,” June 26, 2023). Ko has been slowly falling in the polls since the KMT’s successful attempt to badly wound him with the faux “joint ticket” plan (Taipei Times, “Hou-Ko: 2008 redux,” Nov. 27, 2023).
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Hou, however, has risen a bit in the polls as voters shift around.
In the last few weeks Ma has encysted Hou in a cocoon of deep blue Mainlander politicians. His campaign manager is Ma’s hatchet man, King Pu-tsun (金溥聰). His Vice Presidential candidate is a deep-blue bitter-ender and media personality Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康). If the KMT wins the legislature, the speaker will be another deep blue mainlander, Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the KMT’s 2020 presidential failure.
Surrounding Hou with deep blue mainlanders was Ma’s way of consolidating the deep blue base and reassuring the aging mainlander core of the party that the Taiwanese Hou would remain under Party control. It also means that Hou’s major policies are likely to be reprises of the Ma era. The KMT is offering nothing new.
Photo: Peter Lo, Taipei Times
Hou has already announced that he supports reviving the cross-strait service trade agreement (CSSTA), the unpopular services pact that the Sunflower movement killed in 2014. The expansion in PRC students is of course vintage Ma, part of Ma’s larger project of bringing Chinese over any way possible. Ma also proposed the “free economic zones,” essentially miniature banana republics, to bring in Chinese labor. At the time DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) said: “Thirty-three of the 73 articles in the special act are blank authorizations, which give almost unlimited authority to administrative bodies of the free economic pilot zones.”
Ma’s China policies also called for financial integration of Taiwan with China. In his 2013 Double Ten day speech he expressed the hope that the free economic zones would include financial services. Because the zones were largely outside government regulation, the central bank killed the idea, arguing that it would enable unregulated trade of the Taiwan Dollar with the outside world.
Worse than that, as many noted at the time, banks would have been able to move transactions into the zones, thus placing them outside financial regulations. The spike in financial fraud would have been gargantuan. CommonWealth Magazine documented last month in an excellent article on Taiwan’s booming fraud industry, “Taiwan’s White Collar Fraud Infiltrating Banks,” that financial fraud is booming and that there are now more fraudsters than drug criminals in Taiwan’s prisons.
Why has Hou revived the trade agreement? Because the ultimate goals of Ma’s China policy were always financial integration and flooding Taiwan with Chinese, in any way possible. Financial integration was in turn about getting Chinese Communist Party (CCP) money into Taiwanese financial firms and subordinating them to the PRC, part of the PRC’s long-term plan to subsume Taiwan. Given China’s current economic woes, imagine if Ma had been successful and Taiwanese financial firms were even more exposed in that market.
Few now remember the AIG-Nan Shan-Primus deal of 2010, which brewed into a major scandal. AIG sold Nanshan, then Taiwan’s largest insurer with 4 million Taiwanese under its coverage, to Primus Financial for US$2.15 billion. Over the spring it emerged that the consortium backing Primus included individuals under suspicion of financial crimes and irregularities, CCP princelings, money from state firms and shell companies in terrible financial shape. It was a whirlpool of murky money flows and, as a sturdy Taipei Times editorial (“The devil is in the details,” April 2, 2010) noted at the time, an augury of the future.
These policies are already on full replay. This fall Ma visited New York, where he hobnobbed with his old pal Jerome Cohen, who writes often on Ma, and always extolling him, even for tiniest things, as in 2009 when Cohen wrote in the Wall Street Journal explaining why it was so wonderful that Ma had broken his promise not to run for KMT party chairman while president (Taipei Times, “Chairman Ma’s Challenge,” July 27, 2009).
On that visit Ma was interviewed by Stephen A Orlins, head of the National Committee on US-China Relations (NCUSCR) and before that, of Lehman and Carlyle, both powerful financial firms. Like Ma, he has old connections to Cohen. A month later Orlin’s NCUSCR, along with the equally pro-PRC US-China Business Council, would go on to organize the infamous dinner with Xi Jinping (習近平) on Nov. 15 at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, at which hundreds of US business leaders feted the dictator and mass murderer.
If Hou ever becomes president, I expect US financial leaders to put great pressure on Taiwan to engage in “financial integration” with its mortal enemy, and a Hou administration to attempt to open the nation to PRC financial firms.
This will be presented as a “peace” move, and accompanied by clouds of “pro-peace” articles in the major media from the usual suspects, like B-17s tossing out chaff before hitting Hamburg.
Unless PRC troops actually hit Taiwan’s beaches, that will be Taiwan’s most desperate fight. I hope we never have to face it.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
While Americans face the upcoming second Donald Trump presidency with bright optimism/existential dread in Taiwan there are also varying opinions on what the impact will be here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump personally and his first administration, US-Taiwan relations blossomed. Relative to the previous Obama administration, arms sales rocketed from US$14 billion during Obama’s eight years to US$18 billion in four years under Trump. High-profile visits by administration officials, bipartisan Congressional delegations, more and higher-level government-to-government direct contacts were all increased under Trump, setting the stage and example for the Biden administration to follow. However, Trump administration secretary
In mid-1949 George Kennan, the famed geopolitical thinker and analyst, wrote a memorandum on US policy towards Taiwan and Penghu, then known as, respectively, Formosa and the Pescadores. In it he argued that Formosa and Pescadores would be lost to the Chine communists in a few years, or even months, because of the deteriorating situation on the islands, defeating the US goal of keeping them out of Communist Chinese hands. Kennan contended that “the only reasonably sure chance of denying Formosa and the Pescadores to the Communists” would be to remove the current Chinese administration, establish a neutral administration and
A “meta” detective series in which a struggling Asian waiter becomes the unlikely hero of a police procedural-style criminal conspiracy, Interior Chinatown satirizes Hollywood’s stereotypical treatment of minorities — while also nodding to the progress the industry has belatedly made. The new show, out on Disney-owned Hulu next Tuesday, is based on the critically adored novel by US author Charles Yu (游朝凱), who is of Taiwanese descent. Yu’s 2020 bestseller delivered a humorous takedown of racism in US society through the adventures of Willis Wu, a Hollywood extra reduced to playing roles like “Background Oriental Male” but who dreams of one day
RSS