Walking faster is linked to a significantly lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes, according to the first global study of its kind.
Type 2 diabetes is one of the world’s major health threats, with its prevalence rising sharply in the last three decades, according to the World Health Organization.
More than 537 million people have been diagnosed, but millions more are estimated to be in the dark about the fact they have the condition. It is a major cause of blindness, kidney failure, heart attacks, stroke and lower limb amputation.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Researchers have known for years that walking — and doing so frequently — is associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes. Until now, though it has remained unclear what walking speed is needed to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes.
Now a worldwide analysis of studies shows that a brisk walk or striding is better for reducing your risk of type 2 diabetes than walking at a slower pace. The pooled data analysis of the available evidence was published online in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Researchers found people who walked faster than 3km/h were less likely to develop the condition, while those with a speedier stride of more than 6km/h lowered their risk by 39 percent.
While physical activity is known to be associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes, researchers from Imperial College London, the University of Medical Sciences in Iran and Oslo New University College in Norway wanted to figure out the optimal walking speed.
The team looked at 10 studies published between 1999 and 2022, which included follow-up periods of between three and 11 years. A total of 508,121 adult patients from across the UK, Japan and the US were included.
Compared with strolling at less than 3km/h, an average or normal walking speed of 3-5km/h was associated with a 15 percent lower risk of type 2 diabetes — irrespective of the time spent walking.
The risk reduced even further with a faster pace, with a fairly brisk walk of between 5km/h and 6km/h associated with a 24 percent lower risk.
Those who walked at a speed of higher than 6km/h had a 39 percent lower risk of developing the condition.
“While current strategies to increase total walking time are beneficial, it may also be reasonable to encourage people to walk at faster speeds to further increase the health benefits of walking,” researchers said.
There were some limitations to the research. Three studies included were rated as having a moderate risk of bias, while the remaining seven were rated as having a serious risk.
The researchers also acknowledged that people with a faster walking speed are more likely to be fitter, with greater muscle mass and better overall health.
But there are plausible explanations for the findings, they explained.
Walking speed is an important indicator of overall health and a key indicator of functional capacity.
Faster walking speed is associated with better cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength, both of which are linked to diabetes risk — and brisk walking is good for weight loss, which helps to improve insulin sensitivity.
Neil Gibson, senior physical activity adviser at Diabetes UK, welcomed the findings.
He said the “study highlights what we already know, that being physically active, which can include brisk walking, can help lower a person’s risk of developing type 2 diabetes and that increasing the intensity of activity, such as by walking faster, gives greater overall health benefits.”
“We welcome further research to confirm whether, and to what extent, picking up the pace boosts the positive effects walking can have on reducing the risk of developing type 2 diabetes,” he said.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”