Murumuru spends his weekends toiling on building sites in Japan in the sticky heat of summer to supplement the income from his other job at a bakery. A certified IT specialist, he arrived in Tokyo from Sri Lanka a year ago, hoping to take advantage of job opportunities that have opened up as part of Japan’s efforts to tackle its population crisis and encourage more immigration.
But Murumuru, a nickname given to him by his Japanese colleagues, has found it hard. Despite staff shortages, both he and his wife, a qualified physiotherapist, have found the language barrier an obstacle.
“All of the hospitals ask for N1, as do many IT jobs,” he explains, referring to the highest-level Japanese test for foreigners, requiring the ability to read around 2,000 kanji characters.
Photo: Bloomberg
Despite initial plans to stay for five years, the couple are considering a move elsewhere, perhaps to the UK. They have relatives there and believe his wife could find work in the National Health Service.
With the population expected to decline dramatically in the coming decades — leaving a gaping hole in the workforce — Japan is quietly easing restrictions and accepting record numbers of migrants, mostly from Asian countries such as Vietnam, China, Indonesia and the Philippines. Data released in July showed a record population fall of nearly 800,000 but it also revealed a jump in overseas-born residents, to an all-time high of around 3 million, almost 50 percent up on a decade ago.
The shift provides a welcome boost to the size of its working-age population but requires authorities to negotiate Japan’s complex relationship with “outside people.” Meanwhile, new arrivals often have to navigate rigorous language requirements for jobs that pay less than in comparable countries.
Photo: Bloomberg
ONCE PAID TO LEAVE
Bringing skilled workers from overseas is requiring a significant shift in a nation that not so long ago treated foreign labor as something akin to a necessary, if temporary, nuisance.
The treatment of Japanese-Brazilians who came in the 1990s to work in the factories of Japan is a case in point. The importance placed on bloodlines meant the Brazilian descendants of Japanese emigrants were given priority over other foreign workers in being offered visas.
However, it became clear that most of the new arrivals didn’t speak Japanese and were culturally Brazilian. When the 2008 global financial crisis forced firms to lay off workers, the Japanese government offered them US$3,000 each to go home and not come back.
Japan’s ethnic Korean population has a much longer history, and one that speaks to the challenges in welcoming migration. During the occupation of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 to 1945, thousands of Koreans were forced to work in Japan.
More than 400,000 of their descendants remain, given special residence status but neither Japanese nationality nor the right to vote. Kwang Park, a Tokyo-born descendant, says his identity feels “neutral,” somewhere in-between the two nationalities.
Park remembers encountering discrimination in his early years at school, but said that things had changed by the time his youngest brother went to school seven years later.
“Now I work at a global company, so of course there are foreigners and my background isn’t an issue. I don’t know if the situation would be different were I at a Japanese firm,” he says.
Despite the demographic challenges, Japan has remained reluctant to accept refugees and the number of applicants it grants asylum to annually rarely exceeds double digits. The warm welcome rolled out to around 2,500 Ukrainians since the war began appears at first glance to be a striking exception to decades of policy.
Mariko Ukiyo is a counsellor who runs the Shibuya Himawari center in Tokyo providing support for around 1,500 Ukrainian refugees fleeing the war.
“There is a lot of goodwill towards Ukrainian evacuees because people feel sympathy for their situation and understand their country has been invaded by Russia,” she says.
However, Ukiyo acknowledges that their designation as evacuees, and the understanding that they will return to Ukraine after hostilities end, is a major factor in the positive treatment.
WILL IT BE ENOUGH?
Easing immigration restrictions, such as visa exemptions and expanding the definition of a skilled worker, is a key part of Japan’s efforts to, as prime minister Fumio Kishida put it, “continue to function as a society” but one question remains: will Japan be able to attract enough people?
Park believes it will be hard for Japan to lure large numbers of skilled workers due to language difficulties, dealing with the complexities of Japanese culture and uncompetitive wages in many sectors.
Naohiro Yashiro, dean at the faculty of global business at Showa Women’s University in Tokyo, agrees, saying he believes Japan needs to realize it is “in competition with other countries for the best workers,” and that “the government should persuade the public that accepting immigrants is good for Japan.”
For these reasons, Yashiro dismisses as “nonsense” the projections from the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research that by 2070 more than 10 percent of the total population of Japan, or 9.4 million, will be from overseas (the total population is forecast to fall to 87 million at that point, from the current 125 million).
Yashiro noted that while the government had expanded the definition of skilled immigrant workers, which previously applied mainly to graduates, to include skilled blue-collar workers, the Japanese language requirement had been raised, “a kind of restriction.”
One of the major benefits of more immigration is an increase in competition in the labor market, says Yashiro. With unemployment hovering around 2.5 percent and vacancies often exceeding candidates, the job market is not exactly cut-throat, he says, something that also reduces the probability of resentment against newly arrived workers.
But amid all the questions and difficulties, there are positive signs of a shift.
Park has never seriously considered giving up his Korean passport, but his daughter will have to choose her nationality once she reaches 20, assuming the present laws remain. “We live here and speak Japanese, so I’m fine if she chooses Japan,” he says.
Despite the challenges, Murumuru says there is plenty to like about his current home in Tokyo.
“I really like Japan. I feel no racism from 99 percent of people here,” he says, adding, “People respect each other, whether they do white-collar or blue-collar jobs.”
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS