The 1975 frontman Matty Healy’s recent appearance at a festival in Kuala Lumpur — where he criticized Malaysia’s homophobic laws and kissed a male bandmate on stage — has strongly angered conservatives in the country.
Members of the LGBTQ+ community have also expressed unease over his actions, fearing that the episode risks further exacerbating the hostilities they face.
“He gets to fly out of the country and not face the consequences, while our people have to face the brunt of what just happened,” said drag performer Carmen Rose, who described the speech as self-serving, adding that it risked undoing the work of activists.
Photo: AP
The British pop-rock singer was headlining the Good Vibes festival when he criticized the country’s homophobic laws in a profanity-laden speech . He was holding what appeared to be a wine bottle and spat on the stage as he spoke.
He said: “Unfortunately you don’t get a set of loads of uplifting songs because I’m fucking furious. And that’s not fair on you, because you’re not representative of your government. Because you’re young people, and I’m sure a lot of you are gay and progressive and cool.”
The comment was met with some cheers from the audience.
Photo : Reuters
Healy then kissed the bass player Ross MacDonald as they played the song I Like America & America Likes Me. About 30 minutes later the band walked off stage, with Healy announcing they were now banned.
The following day, organizers of the festival announced that the entire weekend event had been canceled. The government has also said it will tighten entry requirements for foreign artists to perform in Malaysia, according to local media.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Dhia Rezki Rohaizad, the deputy president of Jejaka, a social support group for gay, bisexual and queer men in Malaysia, criticized the government’s handling of the situation, citing Healy’s right to freedom of expression.
But he added that Healy’s speech was not how many activists in the country would have wanted to highlight the issue. “We’ve been doing a lot of work on the ground, community organizing, and having stakeholder meetings with local government agencies,” he said. “Doing it at this scale, with a lot of people who are not aware of the discussions going around with regards to queer activism, that is what is harmful.”
Malaysia’s federal penal code, first introduced during British colonial rule, punishes oral and anal sex with up to 20 years in prison.
Each state and the federal territories of Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya also have sharia codes that generally criminalize gay sex and gender nonconformity.
Activists have warned of increased intolerance over recent years, citing in particular a raid on an LGBTQ+ Halloween party in Kuala Lumpur last year, when 20 people were arrested.
“For people who live in Kuala Lumpur, the raid was a very scary night and I think that since then a lot of us do live in fear,” said Mikhail Hanafi, a member of the LGBTQ+ community. “In a lot of other places in the world, queer nightlife is one of the places where at least a subset of queer people can feel safe and a sense of community.”
MORE HARM THAN GOOD?
This was no longer the case in Malaysia, Hanafi said, adding that when the lights came on in a club at the end of the night, some friends immediately felt a sense of panic, fearing that this was the sign of another police raid.
There was value in foreign performers speaking out, said Hanafi. But he added: “They need to be mindful of how they speak. They need to speak to the community beforehand.”
Activists are especially concerned that Healy’s comments come just weeks before state elections. Campaigning often coincided with a rise in hate speech, said Thilaga Sulathireh, a founder of the group Justice for Sisters, which advocates for LGBTQ+ rights.
On Monday, the national human rights commission of Malaysia said that while it “advocates equality for all and freedom of expression, it is important to stress that these rights must be practiced responsibly and within any restrictions imposed by local laws and cultural considerations.”
Sulathireh said the statement illustrated why LGBTQ+ communities felt nervous. “It is really a testament to the protection that LGBT people have in Malaysia. Of course, folks are going to be concerned — if anything were to happen to them they feel completely unprotected.”
Carmen Rose says she is not able to advertise performances in Kuala Lumpur, due to pressure on the community. “Any foreign artist who comes here and who wants to advocate for us, they need to understand how to go about it,” she said. “What works in the west may not work here. They may actually do more harm than good.”
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS