From livestreamed fish to diplomatic study trips, Japan is waging a concerted campaign to calm controversy before it begins releasing treated water from the Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea.
The problem is massive: the Fukushima Daiichi plant, where several reactors melted down after the 2011 tsunami overwhelmed cooling systems, generates 100,000 liters of contaminated water a day.
The mix of groundwater, rainwater that seeps into the area and water used for cooling is treated by plant operator TEPCO and stored on site. But 1.33 million cubic meters later, space has nearly run out.
Photo: Bloomberg
TEPCO and Japan’s government want to release the treated liquid, diluted with seawater, via a pipe extending a kilometer from the coast where the plant sits.
They say filtration removes most radionuclides — elements that emit radiation — and renders the water no different to that regularly released by nuclear plants elsewhere, a view endorsed by experts and the UN nuclear watchdog.
The release is a “robust plan,” according to Tony Hooker, an associate professor at the University of Adelaide’s Center for Radiation Research, Education and Innovation.
“No environmental or human health impacts are likely to be observed,” he said, though he noted there is growing debate about the global practice of ocean dumping.
Claims about risks “are not founded in scientific evidence,” added Jim Smith, professor of environmental science at the University of Portsmouth.
“Those making claims... should consider the negative impact of their — I think scientifically baseless — claims on the communities in Japan who have been affected by the Fukushima accident,” he added.
‘RADIATION RISKS’
Still, Japan’s government and TEPCO have faced persistent concern and criticism, with some pointing to missteps around the initial accident as grounds for distrust.
Anti-nuclear group Greenpeace has been among the loudest voices condemning the plan, accusing the government of having “discounted the radiation risks.” And neighbors from China to Pacific nations have expressed varying degrees of concern.
Fishing communities that spent years battling stigma and even bans on their catches now fear that rebuilt customer confidence will be destroyed.
No surprise then that dozens of government officials have been drafted in to work on swaying domestic and international opinion.
Regional and international delegations and media have been led on plant tours, sometimes stopping at tanks where fish swim in treated and diluted wastewater — an experiment streamed on YouTube.
There have also been technical briefings for neighbors like South Korea, though government officials said multiple invitations for such talks with China had gone unanswered.
Perhaps the most important plank of Japan’s campaign is a review by the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has endorsed the release plan and will monitor its implementation.
“This is the organization which can provide reassurance to not only the Japanese people but to the international community... they provide the gold standard,” said Shinichi Sato, director of the international nuclear cooperation division at Japan’s foreign ministry.
‘NEGLIBABLE IMPACT’
The IAEA, whose chief is visiting Tokyo and the Fukushima plant this week, said Tuesday the plan meets international standards and will have “a negligible radiological impact on people and the environment.”
Still, it is likely to remain controversial, with Pacific Islands Forum Secretary General Henry Puna last month urging “more time and an abundance of caution.”
And while Seoul has tempered earlier opposition, as diplomatic ties between the neighbors warm, that hasn’t stopped panic buying of salt by some convinced the release will contaminate local seawater.
It’s a painful moment for Fukushima’s fishing communities, whose livelihoods have been battered.
A spokesman for the Fukushima Prefectural Federation of Fisheries Co-operative Associations said TEPCO’s measures inspired little confidence about radiation risks.
But “the reputational damage is the bigger concern,” he told AFP, declining to be named.
“There are still concerns raised both at home and abroad ... and we want the government to do more.”
The release is expected to unfold over several decades, and Japan’s government says its campaign is far from over.
“We understand that this requires a lot of explanation, and we are ready to do that,” said Sato.
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Legislative Caucus First Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
Institutions signalling a fresh beginning and new spirit often adopt new slogans, symbols and marketing materials, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is no exception. Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), soon after taking office as KMT chair, released a new slogan that plays on the party’s acronym: “Kind Mindfulness Team.” The party recently released a graphic prominently featuring the red, white and blue of the flag with a Chinese slogan “establishing peace, blessings and fortune marching forth” (締造和平,幸福前行). One part of the graphic also features two hands in blue and white grasping olive branches in a stylized shape of Taiwan. Bonus points for
Last month, media outlets including the BBC World Service and Bloomberg reported that China’s greenhouse gas emissions are currently flat or falling, and that the economic giant appears to be on course to comfortably meet Beijing’s stated goal that total emissions will peak no later than 2030. China is by far and away the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, generating more carbon dioxide than the US and the EU combined. As the BBC pointed out in their Feb. 12 report, “what happens in China literally could change the world’s weather.” Any drop in total emissions is good news, of course. By
RSS