We may live in a largely secular society, but the Protestant work ethic is still alive and strong. The “lazy” and “entitled” millennials, we have been told, are workshy and self-indulgent. They spend too much and save too little — behavior that is not only harming their future prospects, but those of the world economy.
We should have the grit of our elders, apparently — who weren’t scared to suffer some hardship with the promise of a better life ahead. Except they too are coming under criticism for enjoying the life that they struggled to earn. According to the UK chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, it is time for the over-50s to put away their golf clubs and start contributing to the economy again.
The gospel of self-restraint clearly runs very deep in the cultural psyche and, until recently, psychological research had seemed to confirm that delayed gratification was indeed the secret to long-term success. Yet some recent research has come to question these ideas. While moderate levels of willpower are almost certainly beneficial, people who attempt to avoid all kinds of indulgences are neither happier, nor healthier. They are not even more successful at achieving their goals.
Photo: AFP
By embracing rather than shunning our short-term desires, and knowing when and how to indulge them, we may enjoy greater wellbeing with no cost to our productivity.
By definition, delayed gratification is the idea that putting off temporary pleasure in the moment will lead to greater contentment once we have met our longer-term targets.
The research may be best represented by the famous “marshmallow test,” in which children were asked to resist eating one marshmallow immediately with the promise of enjoying two marshmallows a quarter of an hour later. Years later, those who had succeeded in the marshmallow test got better grades at school and progressed more quickly in their careers.
Photo: Reuters
The finding proved to be so influential that it inspired education programs devoted to building character; the idea even infiltrated Sesame Street, as the Cookie Monster learned to deal with his cravings — and taught viewers to do the same.
“Me want it but me wait,” he sang in the accompanying electropop pastiche.
But does delayed gratification always lead to better wellbeing? Signs that this might not be the case were already apparent in the 1990s. Analyzing the state of the evidence, David Funder at the University of California, Riverside found that children who scored well on self-control also grew up to be overly reserved and lacked curiosity. He also pointed to research showing that women with very high levels of self-control tend to be at greater risk of depression, for instance.
“The correlates of delay of gratification are definitely a mixed bag,” he concluded.
Later research suggested that people with the highest levels of self-control may suffer from feelings of regret. They can struggle to appreciate the present moment, and when looking back over their lives, they come to resent the sacrifices they have made.
To investigate this possibility, Ran Kivetz of Columbia University and his doctoral student Anat Keinan asked university alumni to reflect on their winter breaks from 40 years previously. The researchers found that the aging graduates were much more likely to lament having had too much self-control than too little at this key moment in their youth. Their regret over the pleasures that they had missed from being too sensible, such as turning down the chance to travel, was much greater than any guilt over their moments of indulgence — the times they had skipped their studies, spent too much and acted irresponsibly.
Interestingly, the researchers found exactly the opposite views among current undergraduates: these students were much more likely to endorse the standard view that self-control was preferable to indulgence. It was only with the perspective of a lifetime that the alumni could recognize how much richer their life might have been if they had practiced a little less self-denial.
People with low self-control are often said to have a kind of psychological myopia, but Kivetz and Keinan proposed that many suffer the opposite problem — a psychological longsightedness that leaves them so deeply focused on their future goals, they cannot enjoy all the delicious distractions of the present moment.
Besides ignoring these long-term regrets, historical psychological research might have overstated the short-term consequences of momentary indulgences. According to one prominent theory, any lapse would only encourage more slip-ups, as we find ourselves falling for further temptations.
If you are on a diet, for instance, one slice of cake may soon lead to another, until all your good intentions are in tatters. Similarly, once you start watching videos on YouTube, you may find that the whole morning has passed by without you getting any work done. For this reason, indulgences were seen as “failures” that should be avoided.
This idea also has religious origins.
“This abstinence idea has its roots in Christianity,” says Lile Jia at the National University of Singapore. Yet recent research shows that intermittently giving in to our desires can often be better for our wellbeing, without putting us on a slippery slope to failure. The trick, it seems, is to plan the indulgences in advance.
Jia in his research compares the habits of students with high and low grade point averages (GPAs) at US universities. He was interested in the ways that they responded to big-time collegiate sports games — American football, basketball and baseball. These are an important part of student life in the US, but also a huge distraction from their studies. If successful self-control simply involves avoiding short-term pleasures in the pursuit of long-term goals, then you would expect the high-GPA students to have shunned the matches in the run-up to their exams.
To find out if this was the case, Jia and a colleague at Indiana University Bloomington asked 409 students to take an online questionnaire a week before a home basketball game against a long-standing rival team. They reported their general attitudes to basketball, and then gave an hour-by-hour plan for their studies on the day before the game, the day itself and the day afterwards.
Overall, the low- and high-GPA students hoped to devote roughly the same amount of time to studying over those three days; the big difference lay in the way they distributed those studies. The more successful students planned to take much more time off on the day of the game, but compensated for that with a few extra hours on the days either side of the match. The low-GPA students, in contrast, planned to skip the game entirely.
Crucially, a follow-up study confirmed that the more academically successful students were much more likely to have actively participated in watching the collegiate games and celebrating afterwards — and this brought significant pleasure. “They were enjoying the activities more,” says Jia. That would have then put them in a better psychological state to continue their studies the next day.
Jia’s latest research suggests that the advantages of “strategic indulgence” may come from an increased sense of autonomy — a finding that may be useful for anyone hoping to avoid procrastination at work.
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS