Bert Salt spent the final 13 years of his life exactly where he wanted to be: In Taipei, near his daughter, his three grandsons, and a wide circle of friends. It’s just a shame, Bert’s daughter Elaine says, that her father never enjoyed the sense of security that formal residency status in Taiwan would have given him.
Bert and Elaine’s mother, Irene, had been frequent visitors to Taiwan since 1989, as part of their “sun chasing” lifestyle. After Elaine married a Taiwanese man in 1992, her parents’ visits lasted up to three months.
In 2007, when he was a 75-year-old widower, Bert made Taipei his home. Every three or six months, the Welshman flew overseas and either applied for a new visa or returned using the visa-free entry privilege accorded to Britons.
Photo courtesy of Elaine Salt
Between 2007 and his death on April 27, 2020, Bert spent at least 11 months out of every 12 in Taiwan, Elaine says. Many of the 50-plus “visa runs” he did consisted of flying to Hong Kong, grabbing a coffee at the airport there and then returning to Taiwan without passing through Hong Kong immigration.
One time, while exiting the country at Taoyuan International Airport, an 82-year-old Bert was informed that, because he’d overstayed his visa by a matter of hours, he wouldn’t be allowed back into Taiwan. Yet later that day he had no problems reentering the country. It seems there was a lag between Bert being flagged as an overstayer and his name appearing on the blacklist.
On his next visa run, however, he wasn’t so lucky. Immigration at Taoyuan refused him entry due to his previous overstay, and demanded that the airline he’d flown in with take him back to Hong Kong. It was nearly midnight, and Bert had neither his cellphone nor his credit card with him. When he was allowed to make a call to Elaine, he spoke Welsh so as to confound any officials listening in, and told her he’d exaggerate his heart ailment. He was taken to a hospital. Then, to their surprise, he was allowed to stay in Taiwan as if he hadn’t sullied his record.
Photo courtesy of Elaine Salt
Because of these close shaves, subsequent visa trips caused him considerable stress. “Each time he was due to make a visa run, he’d look ashen and feel unwell. His diverticulitis would flare up, because he was worried he wouldn’t be let back in,” Elaine recalls.
Even after Bert was diagnosed with a brain tumor at the age of 84, officials refused to make an exception and let him stay in the country on health grounds. Their lack of empathy dismayed Elaine. “Their attitude could be summed up as ‘You can’t vote, so whatever you say, we don’t care,’” she says.
As a result, regular visa runs were part of Bert’s life until October 2019. “That final time we went to Thailand. It was the only visa trip on which I had to accompany him, because he needed a wheelchair to walk long distances through the airports by then,” Elaine says.
Photo courtesy of Elaine Salt
Elaine says that her father’s illness didn’t cost Taiwanese taxpayers a single dollar. Because he wasn’t covered by the National Health Insurance system, the Salt family paid for all of Bert’s treatment, spending several million NT in total. Irene Salt, who suffered from multiple sclerosis, also paid large medical bills while in Taiwan, Elaine says.
Bert never worked during his stay in Taiwan. In fact, because he was spending money he’d earned elsewhere, his presence was undoubtedly an economic plus for the country, Elaine adds.
Elaine remains angry and frustrated at the rules that continue to prevent people like her father joining their adult children in Taiwan. She asks, why aren’t they allowed to be “xiaoshun [孝順, filial piety], like other Taiwanese?”
Photo courtesy of Elaine Salt
The family considered various workarounds.
“We looked into setting up a company so he could be hired as a manager. But with no professional licenses, no educational certificates and no employment record — because he always worked for himself — it proved impossible,” says Elaine.
Bert also had opportunities to marry Taiwan citizens in order to obtain residency, but he turned them down.
“I know people who’ve fudged the investment rules or arranged a marriage, simply so a parent could stay here, but that wasn’t something my Dad was prepared to do,” Elaine says.
Because many adult children will do whatever it takes to make their aged parents comfortable and happy, the government’s failure to provide a path to residency for people like Bert Salt, “almost forces us to not abide by the law,” says Elaine.
“Taiwan can do better, and should do better,” she says.
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS