William Lai’s (賴清德) mother was bitterly disappointed when the Harvard-educated doctor told her in the 1990s that he was giving up his medical career to enter politics.
She might forgive him now: As Taiwan’s vice president, Lai was yesterday named as the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate in next year’s presidential election, a vote being watched more closely than ever from Washington to Beijing.
With US-China tensions increasingly centered around Taiwan, the winner of next year’s January election will immediately step into a role that could determine the trajectory of geopolitics and the global economy for years to come.
Photo: AP
Since taking office in 2016, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) rejection of the idea that Taiwan is just a part of China often drew criticism from an increasingly aggressive Beijing while earning the praise of policymakers from both parties in Washington. Tsai’s recent stops in the US, where she met with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and was feted at an awards ceremony in New York, underscore the growing strength of US-Taiwan relations.
“I believe our bond is stronger now than at any time or point in my lifetime,” McCarthy told reporters after the meeting, held at the Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California.
But the US also has uneasy memories of a previous Taiwanese president, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who frayed nerves in Washington with his unpredictable rhetoric and more robust push to cement Taiwan’s de facto independence.
Photo: AP
While Lai, 63, now insists he shares the same stance on Taiwan’s political status as Tsai, arguing that the island is already an independent — although largely unrecognized — country and that there is no need to declare independence, he has generated concern with some of his past comments.
During his time as premier in 2017, he described himself as a worker for Taiwan’s independence. It appears to be a long-held view. During a visit to Shanghai’s Fudan University in 2014, when he was the mayor of Tainan city, he said independence was a consensus view in Taiwanese society, which polls consistently show is true.
Not surprisingly, China has been critical of Lai’s views.
‘ACCIDENTAL’ POLITICIAN
Lai and his supporters say his previous, more-outspoken rhetoric is a thing of the past and that he has grown as a political leader.
“This is not just an election tactic,” said Kuo Kuo-wen (郭國文), a DPP lawmaker known for his close ties with Lai, in an interview. “It reflects that Lai has learned the reality of Taiwan’s international position and the stakes of geopolitical tensions.”
It’s still unclear who Lai could face in January’s vote. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which favors closer ties with China, has yet to decide on their candidate but says it will do so by the end of June. Currently, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) are the main hopefuls, according to opinion polls. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) has indicated he doesn’t intend to run in the election but he remains a possible outside contender.
JUMP INTO POLITICS
Lai’s politics and views on Taiwan were shaped by his upbringing. He was born in 1959 into a mining family on the coast of northern Taiwan just outside Taipei. His mother raised him and his five siblings alone after his father died when he was just two years old.
His mother played a key role in his life and career choices, according to an authorized biography. He studied hard to become a doctor, getting a masters degree in public health from Harvard University, in line with his mother’s aspirations for him.
He then defied his mother’s wishes when deciding to ditch his medical career in favor of politics in the mid-1990s. In his official biography, he describes how he was motivated to stand up for Taiwan during the Third Cross-Strait Crisis, when China fired missiles into the sea around the island in 1995 and 1996. His dissatisfaction with the KMT, which had ruled Taiwan since the 1940s, was another motivating factor, he said.
Lai decided to run to be Tainan’s representative in the now-abolished National Assembly in 1996. His mother vigorously opposed his decision to enter politics, only relenting when she determined he had little chance of winning and would be forced to return to medicine.
She was wrong: Lai won, launching what would become a successful political career that he describes as “an accidental journey.” He later won a seat in Taiwan’s legislature and then became mayor of Tainan in 2010.
As mayor, he earned a reputation for integrity. On official trips to Taipei, he would stay at his family’s older, modest home rather than seek out fancier lodging. He doesn’t smoke or drink alcohol and is seen as less social than many grassroots politicians. He’s also renowned for his memory — giving speeches without notes — and for spending time studying US, Japanese and Chinese politics.
2020 CHALLENGE
On the basis of his favorable poll ratings and reputation as a competent administrator in Tainan, Lai was tapped to serve as premier under Tsai between 2017 and 2019.
That relationship fractured in 2019 when Lai quit his post to challenge Tsai for the DPP’s nomination in the 2020 presidential election. Tsai ended up easily beating Lai in the party primary before extending an olive branch by making him vice president for her second term.
People familiar with the situation say there is no lingering animosity between the two now and described them as having a professional and respectful relationship.
As for how government policy would change under a possible President Lai, people close to him insist he will not deviate from Tsai’s current course of strengthening ties with Taiwan’s major democratic partners, such as the US, Japan and Europe. His recent speeches as vice president also reveal a concern about sustainability and Taiwan’s goal of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
But China looms over it all.
“Taiwan is at a critical moment of survival and development,” Lai wrote in a Facebook post last month, when he registered to be a presidential candidate. “We must continue to strengthen Taiwan, uphold democratic values and ensure Taiwan’s security.”
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
While Americans face the upcoming second Donald Trump presidency with bright optimism/existential dread in Taiwan there are also varying opinions on what the impact will be here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump personally and his first administration, US-Taiwan relations blossomed. Relative to the previous Obama administration, arms sales rocketed from US$14 billion during Obama’s eight years to US$18 billion in four years under Trump. High-profile visits by administration officials, bipartisan Congressional delegations, more and higher-level government-to-government direct contacts were all increased under Trump, setting the stage and example for the Biden administration to follow. However, Trump administration secretary
The room glows vibrant pink, the floor flooded with hundreds of tiny pink marbles. As I approach the two chairs and a plush baroque sofa of matching fuchsia, what at first appears to be a scene of domestic bliss reveals itself to be anything but as gnarled metal nails and sharp spikes protrude from the cushions. An eerie cutout of a woman recoils into the armrest. This mixed-media installation captures generations of female anguish in Yun Suknam’s native South Korea, reflecting her observations and lived experience of the subjugated and serviceable housewife. The marbles are the mother’s sweat and tears,
In mid-1949 George Kennan, the famed geopolitical thinker and analyst, wrote a memorandum on US policy towards Taiwan and Penghu, then known as, respectively, Formosa and the Pescadores. In it he argued that Formosa and Pescadores would be lost to the Chine communists in a few years, or even months, because of the deteriorating situation on the islands, defeating the US goal of keeping them out of Communist Chinese hands. Kennan contended that “the only reasonably sure chance of denying Formosa and the Pescadores to the Communists” would be to remove the current Chinese administration, establish a neutral administration and
RSS