The government recently touted its new 16.7 percent female cabinet as a major achievement in gender equality, but the numbers can be deceiving.
Yes, it’s a marked increase from the previous cabinet, which at 7.5 percent female made up the least inclusive cabinet since 1990. This number was even lower at 4.76 percent in 2020, which is only better than the Martial Law era when zero women served.
What the reports don’t mention is that this number exceeded 20 percent several times during both the Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) eras, but it has so far never met the Executive Yuan Gender Equality Policy Guidelines (行政院性別平等政策綱領) of 33 percent.
Photo: Chen Hui-ping, Taipei Times
Awakening Foundation (婦女新知基金會) Secretary-General Chyn Yu-rung (覃玉蓉) tells the Taipei Times that the notion of progress really depends on who is being compared with and which data sets are referenced.
For example, Chyn says that an often-mentioned statistic is the percentage of women in Taiwan’s legislature, which at 42.5 percent is the highest in Asia.
“But those who are familiar with Taiwanese politics know that when the ruling party holds a majority in the legislature, cabinet members hold comparatively more power,” Chyn says regarding her group’s long-time emphasis on cabinet diversity. “It feels that because we already have a female president, there’s no more problems with female participation in politics. But we see a huge problem.”
Photo: CNA
Of course there has been progress, but Chyn says that painting an overly rosy picture will create an illusion that Taiwan is already gender-equal, and people no longer need to push the government to do better.
“[W]e need to keep identifying areas that are still lacking and figure out how to improve them,” she says.
It’s true that the number of local government heads in Taiwan that are women reached a historic high of 56.3 percent after the local elections late last year, but Chyn says that is the result of election strategy. Usually, the opposition party fields more female candidates — this time, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) nominated twice the number of women than the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — winning big and boosting female representation.
But the Awakening Foundation is more concerned about “local cabinets” (小內閣), referring to the various department heads and leaders within each city or county government. No regions reached the foundation’s targeted 40 percent female rate, with Penghu County coming closest at 38.9 percent.
“We’ve noticed that many of these local heads are later nominated as party candidates or are promoted to positions in the central government,” Chyn says. “It’s very beneficial for one’s political career. We’ve heard officials say that they can’t find any women to nominate — that’s because you’re not cultivating the talent from the local level.”
WAGE GAP
The widening gender wage gap is also concerning for the foundation. After steadily declining for the past decade, the gender wage gap has increased, rising from 14.8 percent in 2020 to 15.8 percent in 2021.
Media and government reports often point out that Taiwan’s pay disparity is better than that of Japan (21.1), South Korea (31.1)* and the US (16.9). Chyn says that those countries are known for their poor performances in that area, and Taiwan should not be measuring itself against them. Instead, it should look at EU countries such as Luxembourg so it can continue to improve.
In fact, Japan ranked 116 out of 146 in last year’s Global Gender Gap Report, which is hardly a good measuring stick.
Other issues such as women receiving less pension than men and female workers being threatened when trying to take parental leave are harder to quantify due to the lack of specific data, Chyn says.
She says that on the surface, it seems that Taiwan’s women can return to work without problems after taking maternity leave. But the foundation still gets many calls from concerned women — some even getting fired.
“The ones who actually take the leave are the ones who have supportive bosses,” she says. “But there are many who need it and aren’t able to. These people do not show up in the data. To truly improve policy, we need to go deeper and interview those having issues to clearly show that there is a problem.”
* An earlier version of this story gave incorrect figures for Japan and South Korea.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from