Right-wing ideologues funded by fossil fuels, fame-seeking narcissists and doubt mongers monetizing their content are pushing climate disinformation that undermines the fight against global warming, researchers say.
Experts outlined six key things that motivate people to deny climate change or seek to delay action.
OIL MONEY
Photo: Reuters
Studies have documented flows of cash from the fossil fuel industry to conservative US think tanks, signaled by researchers as publishers of misleading climate claims.
Greenpeace on the site exxonsecrets.org published documents from oil giant ExxonMobil revealing donations it made in the 1990s and 2000s to three such bodies: the Heartland Institute, the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the Cato Institute. Exxon has repeatedly denied working against climate science.
An analysis of tax documents and donor records by sociologist Robert Brulle of Brown University found that 91 climate-sceptic think tanks and lobby groups received income of US$900 million in 2003-2010, largely from conservative foundations.
Photo: AFP
Since the mid-2000s, the funding has largely been channeled through philanthropic groups that conceal their donations.
“Fossil fuel companies have a long history of funding climate misinformation promulgated by conservative think tanks,” Brulle said.
“This misinformation has misled many Americans regarding the risks associated with climate change and has hindered actions to mitigate carbon emissions.”
MONETIZING
Elsewhere there are individuals “who benefit from the outrage economy online and are exploiting the current business model of social media, which allows them to monetize climate denial and climate disinformation,” said Jennie King, head of civic action at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a London-based digital research group.
“There is a large element of grift taking place in the online space. By cultivating a brand as these contrarian, intellectual Dark Web pundits, they gain increasing prominence on social media platforms,” she said.
“That drives traffic to their Web sites and increases the likelihood of them developing brand relationships, sponsorship and paid talking appearances.”
IDEOLOGY
For psychologists, climate disinformation is driven by free-market ideals that make people reject climate reforms.
“The number one driver of whether people accept climate science or reject it is their personal ideology,” said Stephan Lewandowsky, a psychology professor at Bristol University who researches attitudes to climate change.
“People who are committed to unregulated free markets find it impossible to accept the science because the implications of the science are that we have to have regulations or a price on carbon,” he said.
POLITICS
Some of the most widely shared social media posts come from politicians — such as US ex-president Donald Trump’s repeated claims on Twitter that snowfall was evidence against global warming.
“People who vote conservative are more likely to be climate deniers,” said John Cook, a researcher at Monash University in Melbourne and founder of the climate explainer site Skeptical Science.
“Not liking the solutions to climate change, they reject that there’s a problem in the first place.”
A November study in Nature by researchers at City, University of London revealed a rise in ideological polarization around climate change during the COP26 climate summit in 2021, “driven by growing right-wing activity.”
PSYCHOLOGY
An article published last year co-authored by Lewandowsky and Matthew Hornsey of the University of Queensland pointed to other psychological aspects of climate claims, such as “motivated reasoning” — people deciding what they believe and then seeking evidence that supports their view — and “solution aversion” against reforms that imply painful sacrifice.
“On top of that, people are fearful of climate change,” said Lewandowsky. “Jumping into denial in the context of fear is not uncommon. The pandemic is another prime example.”
FAME
Some climate contrarians have millions of followers on social media.
“I think that malignant narcissism probably is a big driver of the influencers,” said Cook.
“These kind of mini-celebrities — what makes them popular, famous, gets followers, gets blog readers, is their denial of the science.”
Some prolific contrarians are former weather forecasters, such as Anthony Watts, founder of skeptic blog Watts Up With That — or scientists themselves.
“I can think of individual instances of academics who had an extremely mediocre career at best and then climate change came along and they said, ‘Oh, it’s a hoax,’ and claimed to have some expertise,” said Lewandowsky.
“They were flooded with media requests. These guys are motivated by attention.”
Last week the Economist (“A short history of Taiwan and China, in maps,” July 10) and Al Jazeera both sent around short explainers of the Taiwan-China issue. The Al Jazeera explainer, which discussed the Cold War and the rivalry between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC), began in the postwar era with US intervention in the Chinese Civil War and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) retreat to Taiwan. It was fairly standard, and it works because it appeals to the well-understood convention that Taiwan enters history in 1949 when the KMT retreats to it. Very different, and far
To step through the gates of the Lukang Folk Arts Museum (鹿港民俗文物館) is to step back 100 years and experience the opulent side of colonial Taiwan. The beautifully maintained mansion set amid a manicured yard is a prime example of the architecture in vogue among wealthy merchants of the day. To set foot inside the mansion itself is to step even further into the past, into the daily lives of Hokkien settlers under Qing rule in Taiwan. This museum should be on anyone’s must-see list in Lukang (鹿港), whether for its architectural spledor or its cultural value. The building was commissioned
July 15 to July 21 Depending on who you ask, Taiwan Youth (台灣青年) was a magazine that either spoke out against Japanese colonialism, espoused Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ideology or promoted Taiwanese independence. That’s because three publications with contrasting ideologies, all bearing the same Chinese name, were established between 1920 and 1960. Curiously, none of them originated in Taiwan. The best known is probably The Tai Oan Chheng Lian, launched on July 16, 1920 by Taiwanese students in Tokyo as part of the growing non-violent resistance movement against Japanese colonial rule. A crucial part of the effort was to promote Taiwanese
Like many people juggling long hours at work, Chiharu Shimoda sought companionship via a dating app. For two months, he exchanged messages with five or six potential partners, but it wasn’t long before he was seeking out just one — a 24-year-old named Miku. Three months later, they got married. The catch: Miku is an AI bot. And Shimoda knew that from day one. The 52-year-old factory worker is one of over 5,000 users of Loverse, a year-old app that allows interaction only with generative artificial intelligence. Shimoda’s also among a much bigger cohort of people who’ve either given up or