This month’s UN biodiversity talks in Montreal aim to hammer out a new, global agreement. But this isn’t the first time governments have tried to halt environmental loss through agreed targets.
In fact, many of the 24 conservation targets under discussion now aim to avoid past mistakes and improve on the world’s last set of conservation goals — the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
Here’s a look at the Aichi Targets that expired in 2020 with every single target still unmet.
Photo: AFP
WHAT WERE THE TARGETS?
The Aichi Targets, adopted during the 2010 UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) summit in Nagoya, located in Japan’s Aichi prefecture, included goals such as reducing deforestation by at least half during the coming decade and curbing pollution so that it no longer harmed ecosystems.
Many of the targets, however, included vague language and did not hold countries to specific action, experts say.
Photo: AP
After parties adopted the Aichi targets, they were expected to devise their own national biodiversity strategies that would mimic the goals laid out by Aichi. Nearly all parties created these strategies, but most were never fully implemented.
DID THEY SUCCEED?
The most notable Aichi objective — and one of the few to include a numerical goal — aimed to protect or conserve 17 percent of all land and inland waters and 10 percent of the ocean by the end of the decade.
Photo: Reuters
While some progress was made toward that goal, the world ultimately fell short. Today about 15 percent of the world’s land and 8 percent of ocean territories are under some form of protection, though the level of protection varies. And no single country met all 20 Aichi Targets within its own borders, according to a September 2020 UN assessment.
About 10 percent of the targets saw no significant progress, the assessment found. Six of the targets, including the land and ocean conservation target, were deemed “partially achieved.”
“At a global level, none of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets were met or achieved, but we also know that some progress was made at the national level in a number of countries,” said Elizabeth Maruma Mrema, executive secretary of the CBD.
Photo: AP
In the end, Aichi was deemed a failure by the UN and the CBD secretariat called on parties to come up with another guiding document to direct conservation efforts through 2030 and beyond.
WHY DID THEY FAIL?
A lack of clearly defined metrics by which to gauge progress made the Aichi goals tough to implement, experts say.
“Aichi was made of aspirational targets, which was great for ... enabling people to do a lot, but not great for communication,” said Basile van Havre, who is helping mediate negotiations on the new targets for the CBD.
One of the reasons the world was able to meet the goal for conserving 17 percent of land areas globally, he said, was simply that the goal’s success could be defined by that single number.
“It’s important to have measurable targets,” he said.
Monitoring and reporting success was also a big issue with Aichi. Countries largely failed to update others on the progress they were — or were not — making.
“A key priority for us ... is the agreement on robust monitoring, planning, reporting and review framework,” said Hugo Schally, a biodiversity negotiator with the EU.
“Because that is what made the Aichi framework so ineffective, and that’s what generated these negotiation processes.”
MONEY MATTERS
A lack of financing to help developing countries meet the Aichi goals was also an obstacle to their success — a point that has led negotiators to include financing plans within the draft being negotiated at the Montreal talks.
The Global Environment Facility, the primary source of financing for international biodiversity protection, has collected around US$5 billion from 29 countries for the funding period from this year to 2026.
That is hardly enough to make up the US$711 billion funding gap per year estimated by a 2019 assessment by several conservation institutes.
The Aichi targets also failed to garner buy-in from governments beyond the environmental ministers who brokered the deal.
“We need the whole of government,” Mrema said. “It’s not the matter to be left to the ministries of environment alone. This is one of the lessons we’ve learned from the failure of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.”
July 1 to July 7 Huang Ching-an (黃慶安) couldn’t help but notice Imelita Masongsong during a company party in the Philippines. With paler skin and more East Asian features, she did not look like the other locals. On top of his job duties, Huang had another mission in the country, given by his mother: to track down his cousin, who was deployed to the Philippines by the Japanese during World War II and never returned. Although it had been more than three decades, the family was still hoping to find him. Perhaps Imelita could provide some clues. Huang never found the cousin;
On Friday last week, China’s state-run Xinhua news agency very excitedly proclaimed “a set of judicial guidelines targeting die-hard ‘Taiwan independence’ separatists” had been issued “as a refinement and supplement to the country’s ‘Anti-Secession’ law” from 2005, with sentencing guidelines that included the death penalty as an option. At the same time, 77 People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) aircraft were flown into Taiwan’s air defense identification zones (ADIZ) in just 48 hours, a high enough number to indicate the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was peeved about something and wanted it known. What was puzzling is that the CCP always
Once again, we are listening to the government talk about bringing in foreign workers to help local manufacturing. Speaking at an investment summit in Washington DC, the Minister of Economic Affairs, J.W. Kuo (郭智輝), said that the nation must attract about 400,000 to 500,000 skilled foreign workers for high end manufacturing by 2040 to offset the falling population. That’s roughly 15 years from now. Using the lower number, Taiwan would have to import over 25,000 foreigners a year for these positions to reach that goal. The government has no idea what this sounds like to outsiders and to foreigners already living here.
David is a psychologist and has been taking part in drug-fueled gay orgies for the past 15 years. “The sex is crazy — utterly unbridled — which of course is partly down to the drugs but also because you can act out all your fantasies,” said the 54-year-old, who has been in a relationship for two years. Chemsex — taking drugs to enhance sexual pleasure and performance — “has opened a whole world of possibilities to me,” David added. “Sex doesn’t have to be limited to two people... There is a whole fantasy and transgressive side to it that turns me on. It