Among the proselytizers, merchants and adventurers from Europe who inserted themselves into Taiwan’s early modern history, George Psalmanazar is notorious. Centuries before the Chinese Communist Party began faking news about Taiwan, this (most likely) French-born hoaxer, who claimed to be a Formosan and invented his own language to prove it, was regaling eighteenth century London with tales of annual mass sacrifice, floating villages and laws permitting the cannibalization of adulterous wives.
While Psalmanazar later admitted his fraud and actually helped to edit genuine accounts of Taiwan, his real name, birthplace and other key details of his life remained a mystery. It wasn’t until 1968 that the first comprehensive account of The Great Formosan Impostor was published.
The book’s author, Father Frederic Foley, made a valuable contribution to documenting Taiwan’s postwar history. In several curious ways, Foley’s life parallels the subject of his biography — most obviously in the pair’s shared Jesuit background. Yet, unlike Psalmanazar, who is well-known among Formosaphiles, Foley remains relatively obscure.
Photo courtesy of Joseph Ho
Joseph Ho (賀威瑋), an assistant professor of history at Albion College in the US state of Michigan, is in the process of rectifying this. Following the publication in January of Developing Mission, his monograph on photography and filmmaking among American Protestant and Catholic missionaries in China, Ho gave an online talk Oct. 13 that cast light on the work of Foley and his fellow Jesuits in Taiwan.
Hosted by the University of Nottingham’s Taiwan Studies Program, the Webinar was titled Framing Futurity: Photography, Religious Diaspora, and Transnational Imaginations of Cold War Taiwan. The presentation was split into two parts, the first of which focused on Foley’s dual role as a missionary and maker “of extremely high-quality photojournalist images.”
Picking up the strands of Developing Mission, Ho looks at “missionary modernity” and posits a shift toward “Christian arcs of containment.” The idea of an “arc of containment,” advanced in a 2019 work of the same name by Singaporean scholar Ngoei Wen-qing, refers to the crescent of anticommunist states in Southeast Asian that emerged from the confluence of British neocolonialism, anti-Chinese sentiment and burgeoning US hegemony in the region.
Photo courtesy of Joseph Ho
While this development has typically been viewed through a political lens, Ho reframes this to ask: “What does it mean when Christian actors are thinking about their reframing of identity within and without political issues of the arc of containment?”
BLENDED IDENTITIES
Considering the theme of “wayfaring” in the work of photographer Chang Chao-tang (張照堂), which formed the basis of an exhibition last year in Australia on Taiwanese photography, Ho poses several more questions: “Where are we going? How are we finding our path? And what kinds of roots are being set down as part of these experiences and visual materials?”
Photo courtesy of the Foley Collection, Ricci Institute for Chinese-Western Cultural History, Boston College
Wayfaring among diasporic Chinese, which features in such works as Dominic Yang’s The Great Exodus from China (2021), is extended to include the displacement of the missionaries.
Having prepared himself for missionary life in China, Foley is transplanted to Taiwan, where he undergoes “a greater reframing of the mission to which he belonged.” With the 1959 publication of The Face of Taiwan, Foley begins “blending the identity of a photojournalist with the identity of a missionary priest.”
As such, Foley is “not just a kind of mediator between the United States and Taiwan or between Catholicism and the world; he is also a photographic mediator.”
Photo courtesy of the Foley Collection, Ricci Institute for Chinese-Western Cultural History, Boston College
PHYSICAL INTERACTION
Ho says visual technologies and materials have agency.
“Images do things and cameras do things, and together shape micro-historical engagements. They’re involved in lived experience,” he says.
Photo courtesy of Joseph Ho
He notes that to shoot with the Rolleiflex 3.5E camera that Foley used, you had to “curl yourself into a ball” to look down into it.
“There is a performance that is structured by the device that actually puts the photographer, in this case a missionary photographer, in a submissive posture,” Ho says. “That does something to the relationship between the subject, the maker and the audience.”
In the second part of the discussion, Ho spotlights a personal photo collection, which documents generations of a diasporic Chinese Catholic family that Ho eventually reveals as his own. Calling these images “relational memory maps,” he suggests they “represent imagined belonging.”
The albums, says Ho, become a “physical and visual assemblage of material that maps out what it means to set down roots.”
Even blurred images and spaces where photos have been removed or added tell their own story.
“There’s a sense of negotiating absences and technical problems in the evolution of the album.”
At several points in the presentation, Ho draws on Roland Barthes’ seminal work Camera Lucida (1980).
“The photograph is always something that has been,” Barthes writes. “It doesn’t necessarily say what is no longer, but only and for certain what has been.”
Emphasizing this point, Ho also quotes Susan Sontag’s description of photos as “memento mori” that “testify to time’s relentless melt.”
Tweaking this, Ho calls photos “memento vivere,” that remind us to live.
As per the title of the talk, futurity and “afterlives” are embedded within the lived experiences of photographic images. As much as they capture the past, images, Ho says, are also about “looking at the future, thinking ahead and moving forward with materialized visual imagination.”
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
While Americans face the upcoming second Donald Trump presidency with bright optimism/existential dread in Taiwan there are also varying opinions on what the impact will be here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump personally and his first administration, US-Taiwan relations blossomed. Relative to the previous Obama administration, arms sales rocketed from US$14 billion during Obama’s eight years to US$18 billion in four years under Trump. High-profile visits by administration officials, bipartisan Congressional delegations, more and higher-level government-to-government direct contacts were all increased under Trump, setting the stage and example for the Biden administration to follow. However, Trump administration secretary
In mid-1949 George Kennan, the famed geopolitical thinker and analyst, wrote a memorandum on US policy towards Taiwan and Penghu, then known as, respectively, Formosa and the Pescadores. In it he argued that Formosa and Pescadores would be lost to the Chine communists in a few years, or even months, because of the deteriorating situation on the islands, defeating the US goal of keeping them out of Communist Chinese hands. Kennan contended that “the only reasonably sure chance of denying Formosa and the Pescadores to the Communists” would be to remove the current Chinese administration, establish a neutral administration and
A “meta” detective series in which a struggling Asian waiter becomes the unlikely hero of a police procedural-style criminal conspiracy, Interior Chinatown satirizes Hollywood’s stereotypical treatment of minorities — while also nodding to the progress the industry has belatedly made. The new show, out on Disney-owned Hulu next Tuesday, is based on the critically adored novel by US author Charles Yu (游朝凱), who is of Taiwanese descent. Yu’s 2020 bestseller delivered a humorous takedown of racism in US society through the adventures of Willis Wu, a Hollywood extra reduced to playing roles like “Background Oriental Male” but who dreams of one day
RSS