Stephen King, the famed horror writer, once observed that post-apocalypse novels are essentially impossible. Nuclear plants would melt if human civilization disappeared, while chemical plants and pipelines and other infrastructure would poison the earth. Organized life would be impossible. Could it happen here?
This year the Taiwan Climate Change Projection Information and Adaptation Knowledge Platform (TCCIP), which is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, produced its 10-year assessment of local climate research: The Taiwan Climate Change Projection Information and Adaptation Knowledge Platform: A Decade of Climate Research.
The platform and numerous climate-related policies were spurred by the disastrous typhoon Morakot in 2009. The catastrophic rainfall generated floods and landslides across southern Taiwan, killing over 600, and inundating a dozen towns with debris flows and flooding. Belatedly government agencies began to creak slowly into action to respond to the threat.
Photo: Tsai Ching-hua, Taipei Times
‘NATIONAL ADAPTATION STRATEGY’
In 2013, after the usual rounds of meetings and discussions, the government formed a National Adaptation Strategy in 2013. This was a five-year plan involving 399 proposed actions. The second plan ended in 2018, and the nation is currently wrapping up the third iteration of the program, the 2018-2022 plan.
The government has produced a slew of legislation related to this initiative, including a spatial planning act (2016), a wetlands conservation act (2013) and a coast zone management act (2016).
Photo courtesy of reader
It looks neat, clean, progressive and organized. So it’s interesting to compare it with the recent report from Taiwan Plus on the possibility that there are over 400 illegal factories on farmland in Yilan. The Yilan government claimed in the report that it lacked the manpower to check them out.
Let’s put that comment in perspective: when a friend in Taitung County changed the roof over his porch, the government was out there within a few days, citing satellite photos of the new structure. That also happened to another friend nearby who simply hung up a gigantic tarp to keep the sun off his outdoor dining table. The bureaucrats had to return home disappointed after they rushed out to see what new “structure” he had erected.
The government monitors Taiwan’s land use via satellites. In fact, in 2017 it released a report showing there were over 50,000 illegal factories on farmland, a result of satellite studies intended to support the government’s land use zoning programs under the 2016 spatial planning act. A 2020 report from the Ministry of Agriculture noted 130,000 such factories.
Photo courtesy of the EPA
Nor are these firms all tiny mom-and-pop operations churning out cheap plastic crap. Some of them are firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange, with tens of million in revenues. In 2019 the owners of these factories even formed a lobbying group called Tian Yuan (田園) to fight environmentalist efforts to get them removed.
These factories, so important in Taiwan’s land speculation ecology, are critical to other ecologies. Their waste, periodically the subject of bitter complaints by locals and fruitless media reports, is often buried along rivers and in the mountains, via a network of firms who dump unprocessed waste to make money.
FLOODING AND POLLUTION
It isn’t easy to model what will happen with Taiwan, according to TCCIP’s report. Most climate models lack resolution at Taiwan’s smaller scale. But most models show increases in extremes of precipitation, which will result in massive sediment discharges into major rivers, along with increased landslide disasters in upland areas.
Extensive flooding will result: as rivers fill with sediment their beds rise, meaning that they hold less water even as water levels spike due to extreme rainfall events.
Simulation studies of Taiwan’s river basins show how bad things will get. Kaohsiung’s Kaoping River (高屏溪) basin was evaluated in a 2016 paper published in Natural Hazards.
The reason that the Kaoping River was selected was that climate models show that precipitation in the south will increase, especially in the Kaoping River basin. The study used SOBEK, the model officially used by the Water Resources Agency, to simulate the flooding that will occur regularly by the end of the century.
In case the reader imagines that will be a long time from now, recall that climate models are quite conservative, that climate problems are now arriving more rapidly than models predicted and that by mid-century the problem will be obvious, just a quarter-century from now. Indeed, the most recent risk maps generated in the TCCIP paper above show that the Kaoping basin is largely composed of townships colored red and yellow for risk by the mid-century.
In the models published in Natural Hazards, the riverbed rises 1.24 meters due to sedimentation, resulting in flooding along the river whenever it rains hard. Daliao District (大寮) in Kaohsiung will experience the worst floods, but it will be bad everywhere, far worse than Morakot. And it will happen repeatedly.
The Kaoping River area is, like so many other flood-vulnerable areas, carpeted with factories, illegal and legal. Pingtung County’s Hsinyuan Township (新園), where the river meets the sea, is the ancient epicenter of illegal dumping of waste, decades ago filled with sludge from factories in the surrounding area.
But the Kaoping River basin as a whole is an environmental disaster. In Kanding Township (崁頂) next to Hsinyuan, according to a 2020 Commonwealth Magazine piece (“The ‘Ghost’ Shadowing Taiwan’s Industrial Polluters,” July, 2020), fields are strewn with sacks of aluminum slag that leak aluminum waste. Water and sediment from those farms eventually end up in the Kaoping River or the nearby ocean.
Fish ponds, the article observed, many located along the river, are routinely rented by waste-disposal firms who fill them up with waste, concrete them over and then put up prefab buildings which they rent out as factories, or cover them with solar panels.
Consider Daliao, which can expect the worst of the flooding. It hosts an industrial zone, the Kaohsiung city garbage dump and innumerable factories. It is also the site of a former military base. The town is chock full of interesting toxic waste.
Every factory and waste disposal site in Taiwan is a time bomb, but in the Kaoping basin, the time bomb clock is closest to zero. In a mass precipitation event the mud would not only be dangerous but toxic, and flooding would spread it across the basin’s farmlands and low-lying residential districts. Recall that many areas of Pingtung County, especially by the ocean, are below sea level due to overuse of groundwater.
Another issue with increased sedimentation is the reservoirs in the south. The Zengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫), which waters the Chiayi and Tainan plain, was already suffering badly from silting when Morakot knocked out 13 percent of its capacity at one blow. Disasters like that will be a regular feature of our future of alternating droughts (which also increase silting) and extreme precipitation.
The key to resolving these issues is reform of Taiwan’s land system to accommodate its factories. Factory owners crowd onto farmland while land in industrial districts goes undeveloped, held by speculators who drive prices out of the reach of small factory owners. Local governments are broke and eagerly collect taxes from illegal factories.
All this must change. Because there is no post-apocalypse.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
In 1990, Amy Chen (陳怡美) was beginning third grade in Calhoun County, Texas, as the youngest of six and the only one in her family of Taiwanese immigrants to be born in the US. She recalls, “my father gave me a stack of typed manuscript pages and a pen and asked me to find typos, missing punctuation, and extra spaces.” The manuscript was for an English-learning book to be sold in Taiwan. “I was copy editing as a child,” she says. Now a 42-year-old freelance writer in Santa Barbara, California, Amy Chen has only recently realized that her father, Chen Po-jung (陳伯榕), who
Famed Chinese demographer Yi Fuxian (易富賢) recently wrote for The Diplomat on the effects of a cross-strait war on demography. He contended that one way to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is by putting the demographic issue front and center — last year total births in the PRC, he said, receded to levels not seen since 1762. Yi observes that Taiwan’s current fertility rate is already lower than Ukraine’s — a nation at war that is refusing to send its young into battle — and that its “demographic crisis suggests that Taiwan’s technological importance will rapidly decline, and
Jan. 6 to Jan. 12 Perhaps hoping to gain the blessing of the stone-age hunter-gatherers that dwelt along the east coast 30,000 years ago, visitors to the Baxian Caves (八仙洞) during the 1970s would grab a handful of soil to bring home. In January 1969, the nation was captivated by the excavation of pre-ceramic artifacts and other traces of human habitation in several caves atop a sea cliff in Taitung County. The majority of the unearthed objects were single-faced, unpolished flake tools fashioned from natural pebbles collected by the shore. While archaeologists had found plenty of neolithic (7,000 BC to 1,700
Her greatest fear, dormant for decades, came rushing back in an instant: had she adopted and raised a kidnapped child? Peg Reif’s daughter, adopted from South Korea in the 1980s, had sent her a link to a documentary detailing how the system that made their family was rife with fraud: documents falsified, babies switched, children snatched off the street and sent abroad. Reif wept. She was among more than 120 who contacted The Associated Press this fall, after a series of stories and a documentary made with Frontline exposed how Korea created a baby pipeline, designed to ship children abroad as quickly as
RSS