When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government led by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) retreated to Taipei in 1949, the northwestern city of Hsinchu gained tens of thousands of new residents.
An estimated 2.2 million people — civilians as well as soldiers and their dependents — migrated from China to Taiwan between the end of World War II and the Communists’ capture of Hainan Island in spring 1950. Several air force units relocated to Hsinchu’s airfield.
In Hsinchu and throughout Taiwan, the KMT scrambled to find accommodation for military personnel and their family members. The luckiest were assigned houses built by the Japanese government during the 1895-1945 period of colonial rule. Others were billeted in schools or temples. Many had no choice but to assemble some place where they could cook and sleep, using whatever materials they could find.
Photo: Steven Crook
As clusters of shanties sprang up around army bases, KMT propaganda assured soldiers that their wives and children wouldn’t have to put up with such poor living conditions for long.
Chiang declared that the KMT would “prepare for one year, counterattack in two years, sweep out the enemy in three years and succeed within five years.” The regime justified channeling resources to the armed forces, rather than building proper homes, by claiming that a victorious return to the mainland was both inevitable and imminent.
There was no such return, of course. By 1982, the shoddiest jerry-built houses had been demolished and the soldiers’ settlements had been formalized into 879 villages across the nation. Such places developed a subculture that included “military village dishes” (眷村菜, juan cun cai) — hybridized recipes devised by cooks from differents part of China who tried to recreate hometown flavors using Taiwanese ingredients.
Photo: Steven Crook
LIFE IN A MILITARY VILLAGE
Over the past few decades, military dependents’ villages have almost disappeared from the local landscape. And of the several little museums that preserve and celebrate this feature of postwar society, the one in Hsinchu is perhaps the best.
The Military Dependents Village Museum of Hsinchu City (新竹市眷村博物館), at 105 Dongda Road (東大路) Section 2, is within walking distance of major attractions such as the City God Temple (都城隍廟) and 1.7km from Hsinchu TRA Train Station.
Photo: Steven Crook
It’s open from 9am to 5pm, Tuesday to Sunday. Admission is free, and inside you’ll find some highly memorable items, not just the usual uniforms, sewing machines and family photographs.
In English as well as Chinese, the first floor outlines the mass movement of people to Taiwan at the end of the Chinese Civil War, and shows where in the city the newcomers settled down.
Air Force villages were numbered according to the order in which they were established; by the early 1960s, more than 20 of them were scattered around Hsinchu. The other armed services gave names to their communities. For instance, one settlement for army personnel and their families was called Luguang (“Army Glory”) New Village (陸光新村).
Photo: Steven Crook
Luguang New Village was founded in 1953 and demolished half a century later. The first set of houses had bamboo frames, tiled roofs and mud walls.
In contrast to media depictions of military dependents’ villages, which tend to focus on the sense of community in such places, this museum avoids the trap of nostalgia. There’s a mockup of the grim communal toilets that village residents had to use, accompanied by text which describes the lack of lighting at night, and the consequent ubiquity of chamberpots.
To supplement their meager salaries, servicemen received essentials such as rice, flour, and cooking oil. Boxes in which tobacco rations were issued are displayed next to “patriotic” lottery tickets, which the government sold between 1950 and 1987 to make up for paltry tax revenues.
Upstairs, panels explain how scrapped airplanes were recycled into useful household items, and how military-village households celebrated weddings.
This isn’t a large museum by any standards, but if your interest in the past is similar to mine, expect to spend an hour here — and also some time 400m down the road at the Black Bat Squadron Memorial Hall (黑蝙蝠中隊文物紀念館).
THE BLACK BATS
The Black Bat Hall, southeast of the Military Dependents Village Museum at 16 Dongda Road Section 2, is open from 9am to 5pm, Tuesday to Sunday. There’s no admission charge.
Unfortunately, if you don’t read Chinese, you won’t learn much about the Black Bats, an Air Force unit created to undertake long-distance reconnaissance missions over hostile territory.
The displays inside the memorial hall are in Chinese only, and the bilingual leaflet the friendly volunteers will hand you when you enter doesn’t provide a lot of detail. You may prefer to stay at home and read through the several pages of English-language information (with photos) compiled by the Ministry of National Defense at https://air.mnd.gov.tw/EN/Unit/Activity_Detail.aspx?CID=173&ID=113.
Like many people, I knew before visiting the hall that the Black Bats had lost several aircraft and scores of personnel during Cold War spy-flights across China. But I had no idea they’d also conducted operations in Indochina during the Vietnam War.
The squadron flew 252 sorties to transport and supply South Vietnamese troops, during which three Black Bat planes were damaged by enemy fire.
In 1971, they trained to fly helicopters from Thailand across Laos in order to install acoustic sensors at locations in North Vietnam. The CIA (who’d been instrumental in the creation of the Black Bats) wanted to use Taiwanese pilots so Washington would have plausible deniability in the event of the crew being captured. The Ministry of National Defense Web site implies Black Bat pilots carried out the mission, but other sources say the Taiwanese volunteers weren’t up to the job and were sent home. In the end, it was American pilots who carried out what’s known as the “Vinh wiretap.”
Perhaps the Black Bats’ most daring operation was an 8,000km-plus roundtrip from a US air base in northern Thailand to China’s Gansu province in spring 1969. A C-130 Hercules, modified for electronic warfare, successfully delivered sensors that allowed Washington to spy on Beijing’s ballistic missile program.
Unlike many of their comrades, the 12 men on board successfully evaded communist forces and made it home. By any standards, it was a feat that deserves to be remembered.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus convener Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) and some in the deep blue camp seem determined to ensure many of the recall campaigns against their lawmakers succeed. Widely known as the “King of Hualien,” Fu also appears to have become the king of the KMT. In theory, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) outranks him, but Han is supposed to be even-handed in negotiations between party caucuses — the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) says he is not — and Fu has been outright ignoring Han. Party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) isn’t taking the lead on anything while Fu