As Hong Kong students return for the new academic year, veteran teacher Wong is counting down the days until the political maelstrom sweeping the city leaves him no choice but to quit.
Wong, 34, fears he will soon join the exodus of teachers and students triggered by Beijing’s tightening grip on Hong Kong, which has started transforming local schools, according to multiple educators.
The latest government figures show more than 4,000 teachers left their jobs in the past school year, a five-year high and a 70 percent spike from the year before.
Photo: AFP
“I have no faith in the future of Hong Kong or that of the industry. It is hard to nurture a person in this environment,” Wong, who asked to use just his surname, said.
The political crackdown has coincided with the coronavirus pandemic, during which Hong Kong has kept strict zero-COVID rules that have fueled further departures. Students have pulled out of school in droves, with 30,000 fewer attending primary and secondary school in September last year compared to the preceding October.
Wong, who has taught for more than a decade, said five teenagers from his class of 32 withdrew halfway through a term to emigrate.
Photo: AFP
“The students are leaving not because they dislike the school, but because of Hong Kong’s environment.”
PATRIOTIC CLASSROOMS
China is remolding once outspoken Hong Kong in its own authoritarian image, following massive and sometimes violent democracy protests in 2019 in which youngsters played a key part.
Photo: AFP
Teachers have since been ordered to instil patriotism in students and comply with a Beijing-imposed national security law that has criminalized much dissent.
Curriculum are being tweaked to align more closely with Chinese Communist Party ideology.
Earlier this month teachers were told to “study and learn the key messages” of a recent speech by President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Students and parents have also been encouraged to report teachers who might be breaching the security law. Wong received a letter of reprimand from Hong Kong’s Education Bureau last year after his teaching materials analysing the pros and cons of civil disobedience drew anonymous complaints.
“It shattered the trust that was fundamental to teaching,” he recalled.
Between 2019 and last year, Hong Kong authorities received 344 complaints against teachers in relation to the democracy protests, with 55 percent of cases found to be substantiated.
One high-school principal said he would instruct staff to keep their heads down and comply with government guidelines to the letter.
“Everyone is being very careful ... If some (teaching materials) may touch on political sensitivities, then we’ll skirt around it,” said the principal, who requested anonymity. “Nobody wants trouble and the teachers don’t want to be held personally responsible.”
LOWER STANDARDS?
Authorities have rejected the idea of an emigration wave and argue teachers choose to leave their posts for various reasons, including retirement and further study.
Hong Kong’s education chief said schools were generally operating smoothly and there were enough qualified teachers despite a “slightly higher” attrition rate.
But a recent survey of 140 schools showed each institution on average lost 32 students and seven teachers over the past year.
Newspaper Ming Pao surveyed its classified section and found at least 200 schools were still looking for teachers in late July. In previous years most vacancies would be filled by the end of May.
Administrators say some schools have been forced to hire less-qualified candidates.
Schools are also competing to poach students, as their headcount often determines their government subsidies and protects against closure.
And education is not the only sector affected by brain drain. The city’s labor force has dropped about six percent since 2018 to 3.75 million people, according to the latest official figures, the lowest number in nearly a decade.
A new generation of Hong Kong teachers are now weighing options and assessing risks that come with their careers.
University graduate Mak, 23, has spent a year teaching English at a secondary school even though he does not have a teacher’s diploma — a fact his employer did not seem to mind.
“I’ll continue teaching for the next few years, but not necessarily in the long term,” he said.
Mak feels he has little control over what happens to his profession.
“There’s not much that can be changed,” he sighed. “You either submit, or quit.”
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS