This month it was revealed that China has been telling US officials that the Taiwan Strait is not an international waterway, but China’s territorial waters.
“China has sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the Taiwan Straits,” the Global Times thundered last week.
The slow, inexorable expansion of China’s territorial claims by land and sea signals that once Taiwan is annexed, this problem of Chinese expansionism will only become more dire. As a solid explainer from The Interpreter observed last year, China treats “territorial waters” as sovereign waters: “China’s interpretation of the territorial sea is that the state has the exclusive right to make, apply and execute its own laws in that space without foreign interference.”
Photo: EPA-EFE
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS
A glance at any of the many maps of Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) claimed by China shows the potential conflicts once Taiwan is obtained. To the east, a string of Japanese islands would punch holes in China’s EEZ, automatically creating further friction between those two nations.
The Japanese themselves are well aware of that possibility. Of the Yaeyama Islands, Yonaguni island is closest to Taiwan. It has its own language, Dunan Munui, and boasts a long history of links to Taiwan (killed when the US shut down black market links early in the postwar era). Currently Japanese, it was once part of the Ryukyu Kingdom’s trading networks.
Photo: AP
In the 19th century, Japan actually offered the Yaeyama islands to the Qing Dynasty as part of a trade deal for access to China’s interior. That fell through and Tokyo eventually solidified its control over them.
It is easy to see, though, how China could turn that past into a set of claims to the islands. The Chinese already see Okinawa and Taiwan as theirs, and the Yaeyama have links to both. Beyond them are the Miyako Islands, again with historical links to Okinawa.
North of Taiwan, the EEZ would encompass the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan, to which both the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) invented claims when the possibility of oil in the area was announced in the late 1960s. A glance at the map shows obvious progression in Chinese claims from there to the Yaeyama. In Chinese propaganda, all these claims would be mutually reinforcing.
Once the Chinese gain control of Taiwan, their claims to various territories of the Philippines would automatically intensify. When it doesn’t invent history outright, Beijing loves to data-mine it: witness the way it abuses the third century Book of Wu (吳書) in the Records of the Three Kingdoms (三國志) to claim that the trip to find Yizhou (夷洲) was, absurdly, a trip to Taiwan.
Consider the history of the Batanes Islands between Taiwan and the Philippines. It is very possible to construct a history in which they belong to Taiwan. For example, a piece in the Taipei Times, dated Sept 23, 2004, “Bashi Strait: a lesson in geography” by Chen Hurng-yu (陳鴻瑜), asserts that Spanish, Japanese and Americans never really did nail down who the Batanes belonged to, and the Americans brought them into the Philippines by the simple act of occupying them in January of 1900. Taiwan, Chen appears to think, could have a claim to them.
The key point is not whether such a claim is rational, but that it could easily be magicked into existence, reinforced by the ancient cultural links between the peoples of Orchid Island and the Batanes.
Indeed, one of the dashes of the infamous (9-, 10-, 11-) dash line goes through the Bashi Channel between Taiwan and the Philippines just north of the islands. A few years ago China proposed constructing a “smart city” on Fugu Island off Luzon, in the Bashi Strait. The Chinese are obviously thinking about how to stake a claim to the area.
In the Paracels, China has already established its future interpretation of islands and the areas they control. It treats the waters between the Paracels as internal waters and draws baselines for its EEZ based on that principle, and is planning to do this for the Spratlys once it has the military ability to do so, according to China expert Oriana Skylar Mastro.
Already China implements an annual three-day fishing “ban” in the South China Sea as a way to assert its sovereign control over those waters. Its own boats with licenses can ignore the “ban,” as do the Philippines and Vietnam. But at some point these symbolic gestures will be backed by military force and by its maritime militia, its armed fishing boats and large, well-armed Coast Guard cutters. Then they will become real.
Imagine that applying to all the waters between Okinawa and Taiwan, or between Taiwan and the Philippines. Imagine too how Chinese fishing boats will eliminate Taiwanese fishing boats once China has Taiwan.
ILLEGAL FISHING
It should be noted that the opposite is not true: Chinese fishing fleets are famed for illegal fishing in other nations’ waters. In 2016 a Chinese fishing boat sank a South Korean coast guard cutter in South Korean waters. On several occasions Chinese coast guard cutters and Indonesian coast guard vessels have confronted each other in the Natuna Islands (納土納), whose waters are claimed by China as “traditional fishing grounds.”
Similarly, in violation of international sanctions, Chinese boats fish in North Korean waters, driving North Korean fishermen to desperation. Every year scores of North Korean fishing boats wash up in Japan and Russia carrying the bodies of men who have died of starvation and exposure, thanks to the Chinese fishing fleet occupying their fishing grounds.
A China in control of Taiwan will be a China further expanding illegally and violently into Pacific fishing grounds.
Multiply all these conflicting, overlapping claims, the ambiguities of 19th century colonial history and the claims it generated, and the growing power of China and its complete lack of regard for either international law or the territorial integrity of other nations. Add Chinese control of Taiwan to that witch’s brew.
The state of a future in which Taiwan is annexed to China is obvious — constant low intensity conflicts, flaring up into wars, everywhere along the expanding periphery of China’s claims.
People who think that they can resolve the “Taiwan issue” by giving the nation to China are asking for a future of constant warfare in Asia.
That the existing Chinese claims to Okinawa and the Diaoyutai/Senkaku will almost certainly lead to further conflict is something many of us have commented on. But few commentators have envisioned how annexing Taiwan will lead to further conflict via its inflated claims, especially in conjunction with its global fishing behavior.
Want peace? Keep Taiwan free.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
JUNE 30 to JULY 6 After being routed by the Japanese in the bloody battle of Baguashan (八卦山), Hsu Hsiang (徐驤) and a handful of surviving Hakka fighters sped toward Tainan. There, he would meet with Liu Yung-fu (劉永福), leader of the Black Flag Army who had assumed control of the resisting Republic of Formosa after its president and vice-president fled to China. Hsu, who had been fighting non-stop for over two months from Taoyuan to Changhua, was reportedly injured and exhausted. As the story goes, Liu advised that Hsu take shelter in China to recover and regroup, but Hsu steadfastly
You can tell a lot about a generation from the contents of their cool box: nowadays the barbecue ice bucket is likely to be filled with hard seltzers, non-alcoholic beers and fluorescent BuzzBallz — a particular favorite among Gen Z. Two decades ago, it was WKD, Bacardi Breezers and the odd Smirnoff Ice bobbing in a puddle of melted ice. And while nostalgia may have brought back some alcopops, the new wave of ready-to-drink (RTD) options look and taste noticeably different. It is not just the drinks that have changed, but drinking habits too, driven in part by more health-conscious consumers and
On Sunday, President William Lai (賴清德) delivered a strategically brilliant speech. It was the first of his “Ten Lectures on National Unity,” (團結國家十講) focusing on the topic of “nation.” Though it has been eclipsed — much to the relief of the opposing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — by an ill-advised statement in the second speech of the series, the days following Lai’s first speech were illuminating on many fronts, both domestic and internationally, in highlighting the multi-layered success of Lai’s strategic move. “OF COURSE TAIWAN IS A COUNTRY” Never before has a Taiwanese president devoted an entire speech to
RSS