Activists from Hong Kong and Taiwan have expressed hope that in the future Taiwan will keep alive the memory of the 1989 pro-democracy movement in Beijing after Hong Kong’s decades-long tradition of hosting the world’s largest annual candlelight vigil was banned for the third consecutive year Saturday.
However, several activists keenly involved in organizing the memorial every June 4 in Taiwan to commemorate the victims of China’s military crackdown on the student-led movement in Tiananmen Square, said that great effort would be needed for the issue to take root locally.
As in the past, the main June 4 memorial event in Taiwan took place at Liberty Square in front of Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei, Saturday night. It marked the 33rd anniversary of the event and attracted several hundred people.
Photo : REUTERS
The turnout for the event has varied over the years, according to some organizers.
There is usually at least a few hundred people, but the crowd swelled to around 3,000 in 2019 and 2020 after mass protests in Hong Kong against an extradition bill, which was later suspended, attracted the attention of the world, the organizers said.
In Hong Kong, on every June 4 since 1990, tens of thousands of people have turned Victoria Park into a sea of candles until the event was banned in 2020 by the authorities, citing COVID-19 concerns, which critics said was a pretext to snuff out the local pro-democracy movement.
Photo : REUTERS
However, not only has the symbolic vigil been banned, the National Security Law imposed by Beijing on Hong Kong in June 2020 intensified efforts to eradicate Tiananmen-related memories.
Since then, there have been reported cases of vigil organizers being disbanded, people arrested for carrying flowers to mark the anniversary, churches canceling Tiananmen memorial Mass, and the city’s June 4th Museum forced to close and access to its Web site blocked.
As freedoms in Hong Kong have been curtailed, some activists have expressed hope that Taiwan will “pick up the baton” and become a new stronghold for Tiananmen commemorations.
Photo : REUTERS
DEEPER MEANING
Despite its small scale, the June 4 memorial in Taiwan still means a lot to Hong Kongers living in the country.
Being here on remembrance day for the victims of the Tiananmen Incident “added another layer of meaning for Hong Kongers this year,” because they were not allowed to do so in Hong Kong, Francis, who moved to Taiwan last year, said at Liberty Square Saturday.
Francis said she didn’t feel as compelled to attend the June 4 vigil in Victoria Park when she was in Hong Kong as she does now in Taiwan.
“Now I want to show the world that Hong Kongers remember June 4,” she said.
Stella, who migrated to Taiwan in 2020, said attending the June 4 commemoration in Taiwan made her feel as if she is still in Hong Kong. “It also reminded me that I am from Hong Kong,” she said.
Like Francis, Stella said she was not enthusiastic about joining the June 4 vigil when in Hong Kong, adding that since the Umbrella Movement for universal suffrage emerged in 2014, some pro-democracy groups in Hong Kong also gradually distanced themselves from the vigil.
“Because we didn’t think China would embrace democracy. As Hong Kongers, we felt that our priority was fighting for democracy in Hong Kong,” she said.
Lam Wing-kei (林榮基), a former manager of Hong Kong’s Causeway Bay Books detained in 2015 for selling materials critical of China’s political elite, also observed the growing tendency for Hong Kongers to take a more “detached” view of June 4 commemorations.
“I used to be very concerned with China because of my national identification. But in recent years, I felt that there was not much difference I could make. Like many Hong Kongers, I also identified myself more with Hong Kong than China,” Lam, who moved to Taiwan in 2019, said.
In a similar vein, Lam has noted a lack of interest among the general public in Taiwan at commemorating the Tiananmen Square Massacre and in learning about its history.
The “shift of national identity” from China to Taiwan in many Taiwanese has made them aloof from what’s happening in China, Lam said. He has reopened his bookshop in Taiwan.
DIVIDED VIEWS
Although Taiwan’s democratization has fostered a growing Taiwan-centered consciousness of national identity, it is still divided when it comes to identification, which some activists said has influenced the extent to which Tiananmen-related issues resonate with society.
A few years ago, students involved in organizing memorial events for the June 4 incident preferred to focus on pushing for democratization in China, because they saw it as a favorable condition for unification between Taiwan and China, Thomas Tu (涂京威), an organizer, said.
Other students argued that aside from “vindication of June 4,” the main theme of the annual memorial, other issues to be highlighted should be human rights violations committed by the government of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Tu said.
“Gradually, those students became less interested in June 4 events. Some said they don’t identify with China, nor do they live under CCP rule. They didn’t see the point of calling on China to vindicate June 4,” Tu said.
Likewise, an activist under the pseudonym Liang Wei-yuan (梁偉源) said some June 4 event organizers have confronted questions regarding their involvement in such activities.
A question the Taiwan Association for Human Rights (TAHR) often gets asked when working on June 4 events is “why don’t you focus on issues about Taiwan?” Liang said.
Marking the June 4 anniversary at Victoria Park has been a significant force shaping the identity of people in Hong Kong, but it did not play a role in Taiwan’s democratization, said Wu Rwei-ren (吳叡人), an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Taiwan History.
Because of the different historical memories of people in Hong Kong and Taiwan, compounded by the complexities associated with identification and cross-strait relations, it will be a very difficult task to keep the June 4 issue in the public eye in Taiwan, as in Hong Kong.
Activists will have to go to great lengths to develop discourse and convince society about the importance of commemorating June 4, Wu said.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS