You’d have to be living under a rock not to know we are in the midst of one of the most devastating pandemics in history. Just how devastating became clear earlier this month when the World Health Organization released a report estimating the global excess death toll due to the pandemic as 15 million — nearly three times the official COVID death count. Other authorities think global excess deaths may be closer to 18 million. These are awfully big numbers, but they pale in comparison with the 1918-1919 Spanish influenza pandemic, which killed an estimated 40 million people — equivalent to about 150 million globally using current population figures.
So, miserable as COVID has been, it is not the “Big One.” According to Bill Gates, that specter awaits us in the not too distant future, which is why we’d be advised to start preparing now.
“It will be tempting to assume that the next major pathogen will be as transmissible and lethal as COVID, and as susceptible to innovations like mRNA vaccines. But what if it isn’t?” he writes in his new book.
It’s a good question. Gates’s proposal, essentially, is that we should do more of what we’re doing already but better and faster. No one can say whether the next pandemic will be caused by a coronavirus, influenza or some pathogen we haven’t considered yet, but with better surveillance systems and laboratory diagnostics we should be able to rapidly identify the culprit and devise medical countermeasures before the outbreak has a chance to spiral out of control.
Most of all, he writes, we need to “practice, practice, practice” by holding regular pandemic exercises and by funding a 2,000-strong team of global pandemic firefighters — Gates, who is fond of acronyms, labels this team Germ, short for Global Epidemic Response and Mobilization.
He does, however, acknowledge that such measures will count for nothing if, having identified gaps in our pandemic response systems, we fail to correct them. In 2016, for instance, Britain’s Exercise Cygnus identified gaps in the UK’s readiness for a flu pandemic, including insufficient stocks of PPE, but no one acted on the recommendations, leaving the UK to beg and borrow PPE from other countries when disaster hit.
Similarly, US planners had long known that mass diagnostics would be crucial in the event of a pandemic. Yet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention failed to roll out COVID tests at anything like the scale required, hampering contact tracing and effective isolation measures. And because of America’s federal system of government, state governors were often unsure who was responsible for what.
The result was that the US suffered one of the highest COVID mortality rates in the world. By contrast, countries such as Singapore, Vietnam and Canada, which had been badly hit by SARS in 2003 and had absorbed the lessons, responded quickly and decisively to Sars-CoV-2, as the coronavirus that causes COVID is known.
So far, so logical. But if preventing pandemics was simply a matter of better logistics and trusting in scientific experts, we would surely have solved the problem by now. That we haven’t is down to the fact that science is full of uncertainties, especially in the early stages of a pandemic when reliable data on the infectivity of a pathogen and its mode of spread may be wanting.
Moreover, scientists are prone to blind spots — in 2014, for instance, few experts thought that Ebola, a virus that had previously caused outbreaks across central Africa, posed a threat to countries in west Africa such as Sierra Leone and Liberia. Similarly, based on the experience of SARS, which was easy for clinicians to spot because those infected became rapidly and noticeably ill, few experts thought that Sars-CoV-2 was capable of asymptomatic spread until it was too late.
In other words, preventing pandemics is as much an epistemological problem as a technical one. We can prepare for known pandemic threats, but so-called Black Swan events are by definition unknowable and unpredictable.
If this problem has occurred to Gates, he does a good job of disguising it. “I am a technophile,” he explains unapologetically. “Innovation is my hammer.”
Nor is he interested in addressing the role of information technology in spreading conspiracy theories about vaccines or misinformation about the effectiveness of lockdowns and mask mandates. This is surprising given that Gates has been accused of using vaccines to plant microchips in unsuspecting populations and is a prominent target for anti-vaxxers. But rather than calling for a rapid reaction team to neutralize fake news about vaccines, Gates ducks the issue, writing that he is confident “the truth will outlive the lies.”
I do not share his optimism. If anything, the experience of COVID demonstrates that conspiracy theories now present a major impediment to the management of pandemics along rational scientific lines. Never mind Germ. What is needed is Dirt — Disinformation Response Team.
April 14 to April 20 In March 1947, Sising Katadrepan urged the government to drop the “high mountain people” (高山族) designation for Indigenous Taiwanese and refer to them as “Taiwan people” (台灣族). He considered the term derogatory, arguing that it made them sound like animals. The Taiwan Provincial Government agreed to stop using the term, stating that Indigenous Taiwanese suffered all sorts of discrimination and oppression under the Japanese and were forced to live in the mountains as outsiders to society. Now, under the new regime, they would be seen as equals, thus they should be henceforth
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
With over 80 works on display, this is Louise Bourgeois’ first solo show in Taiwan. Visitors are invited to traverse her world of love and hate, vengeance and acceptance, trauma and reconciliation. Dominating the entrance, the nine-foot-tall Crouching Spider (2003) greets visitors. The creature looms behind the glass facade, symbolic protector and gatekeeper to the intimate journey ahead. Bourgeois, best known for her giant spider sculptures, is one of the most influential artist of the twentieth century. Blending vulnerability and defiance through themes of sexuality, trauma and identity, her work reshaped the landscape of contemporary art with fearless honesty. “People are influenced by
The remains of this Japanese-era trail designed to protect the camphor industry make for a scenic day-hike, a fascinating overnight hike or a challenging multi-day adventure Maolin District (茂林) in Kaohsiung is well known for beautiful roadside scenery, waterfalls, the annual butterfly migration and indigenous culture. A lesser known but worthwhile destination here lies along the very top of the valley: the Liugui Security Path (六龜警備道). This relic of the Japanese era once isolated the Maolin valley from the outside world but now serves to draw tourists in. The path originally ran for about 50km, but not all of this trail is still easily walkable. The nicest section for a simple day hike is the heavily trafficked southern section above Maolin and Wanshan (萬山) villages. Remains of
RSS