Last week CNN Travel profiled Taiwan’s new gourmet dining train called the “Moving Kitchen.” Sparked by an open letter from a Taipei-based architect, it features a bar, a kitchen and two new dining cars with seats for 54, according to CNN. With 33 business class seats, travel booking by Lion Travel and food provided by the Silks Hotel group, this large outlay of public monies is obviously aimed at a miniscule class of affluent travelers. This follows a pattern common to public programs the world over, in which public investments are aimed at luxury consumers, rather than those of us who use the system daily and need a wider range of services.
My thought was, when I saw it, was simple: “got space for useless gourmet train, but none for bikes.”
If you read the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) Web site on bikes, it says all sorts of things, in lame and confusing “we have funding for gourmet train but not for professional translation and editing services” English. I am sure readers will quickly grasp the meaning of sentences like “People and passengers: bicycles can be brought to the train and the same passengers as the passengers.”
It’s not often I have to employ a translator to read English.
The regulations themselves are complicated, specifying in great detail, this or that train, costs and so forth. So bad are they that a number of helpful English language sites have arisen to explain them, like rabbis making the Mishnah clear to ordinary people.
Photo courtesy of the Hualien City Government
Although the TRA advertises itself as bicycle-friendly, and other government Web sites refer to it that way, in recent years its services for bikes have actually been reduced. It used to be that certain express trains had a final car designated for bikes, with clips so you could simply roll bikes on. Why was this useful service terminated?
The TRA has also killed its wonderful bike shipping service, which you could use to ship your bikes to many stations around the country. I used it hundreds of times.
As is so often the case, “improvements” also led to declines in service. The elevated rail lines in Taichung meant that the old bike shipping service was no longer offered from the stations in that city and goods had to be schlepped to either Fongyuan District (豐原) or Changhua (the elevated lines also lengthened the time passengers needed to board a train, but things were better for car drivers who were not using the train. Priorities!).
Photo: Hong Mei-hsiu
For commentary on TRA’s bike-friendliness, I turned to my friend (and occasional Taipei Times contributor) Mark Roche, who is well known in the foreign cycling community, and who used to operate a small bike tour company in the antiquarian age before COVID-19. Roche has been active in trying to get TRA to change its policies.
Last year Roche detailed some of the problems we cyclists regularly encounter on TRA trains in a letter to the company. He pointed out that if he brings his heavy touring bike to a station, he is never permitted to wheel it onto the platform and bag it there. He has been told that is unsafe.
However, if he is riding a local and buys a ticket for his bike, he can easily wheel the bike onto the platform. “It seems,” he observed, “the only thing TRA is concerned about is whether I am paying extra money for the bike and [the] regulation has nothing to do with safety.”
Photo: Wang Shan-yan, Taipei Times
I have never been permitted to bag or unbag my bike on the platform, meaning that I have to carry it through the station, occasionally bashing people or objects or once, tumbling down stairs when I overbalanced with a heavy bike. It would be much safer if all cyclists could wheel their bikes to the platform and bag/unbag them there — indeed many stations have stairs equipped for that — not just those who have purchased a ticket for a local.
“When I go to any train station and tell the staff at the ticket counter that I am taking a bike on the train,” he continues, “I ask them which car has larger luggage space or somewhere to put my bike, but they never know the answer to this question. Usually, they just tell me to go find space myself. This is a terrible service.”
As an avid cyclist, I have had this experience many times myself. Staff are confused about or even ignorant of the rules. Downstairs you buy a ticket and are told it’s no problem to put a bike on the train. Upstairs at the platform gate the TRA employee tells you that you cannot put that bike on the train.
Photo: Wang Shan-yan, Taipei Times
This caprice means that every time I try to put a bike on a train, I find myself steeling for a confrontation. Yet this caprice also means that conductors often wink at regulations. My bike and I have had many wonderful experiences with humane and generous TRA staff. My thanks to you all.
I told Roche that now when I want to put a bike on the express train, I purchase two express tickets, one for me and one for the bike. I set the bike up in the seat next to me. So far I have not been challenged when doing that. It’s a suboptimal solution for all concerned, but at least it works.
He replied: “I refuse to do that. It’s the principle of the thing. I should be able to buy a half fare ticket and roll the bike onto any train.”
This is one of his recommendations to the TRA.
“Always charge for the bike,” he suggests. “Most people would prefer not to take their bike apart and put it in a bag. They are afraid of an expensive bike getting damaged. Half adult fare for a bike is not expensive and I think most people would accept this charge if they know their bike will be in a safe place.”
That is exactly why I purchase a seat for my bike. Roche also called on the TRA to ensure that every train – not just designated trains – has 1-2 spaces for bikes.
Ironically, Roche wrote that letter last year, the Year of the Bicycle here in Taiwan.
LIBERALIZE BIKE POLICIES
The TRA needs to liberalize its bike policies. Sometime this year Taiwan will likely re-open to tourism. Our nation is already well known for its cycling, and the TRA needs to get onboard with making things easy and comfortable for cyclists from overseas who want to use its services without hassles, misunderstandings and angry confrontations.
The other reason TRA needs to rethink its restrictive bike policies is to support city planning for car-free downtowns. Around the world numerous cities have designated car-free areas or have gone entirely car-free. Indeed, Jason Hu (胡志強), the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) mayor of Taichung, was contemplating such a move for downtown Taichung before he was ousted from office. Local governments dependent on tourism, such as Miaoli and Taitung counties, should also be pushing the TRA to simplify and expand its bike services.
Imagine it: TRA change could help drive change that would make Taiwanese cities more livable and environmentally friendly.
And users happier. Win-win, for sure.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
May 23 to May 29 After holding out for seven years, more than 250 Yunlin-based resistance fighters were finally persuaded to surrender in six separate ceremonies on May 25, 1902. The Japanese had subdued most of the Han Taiwanese within six months of their arrival in 1895, but intermittent unrest continued — in Yunlin, the Tieguoshan (鐵國山) guerillas caused the new regime much headache through at least 1901. These surrender ceremonies were common and usually conducted peacefully, but the Japanese had different plans for these troublemakers. Once the event concluded, they gunned down every single attendee with machine guns. Only Chien Shui-shou
The toll rolls on. A gunman walks into a place where humans are peacefully gathering and slaughters them for a militantly-avowed racially-based nationalism, presented in a long manifesto. We are quickly told that the gunman was mentally ill. Obviously — who but a madman could do such a thing? The newspapers dust off one of their “education of a killer” pieces, change the names and run another 1,200 words useful only to those cultivating such killers. The latest of these attacks, on Taiwanese churchgoers in Laguna, California, has spurred much discussion of the long record of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) violence
Household appliances contain plastic components. Medical devices made of sterile plastic, such as disposable syringes and plasma bags, are indispensable to 21st-century healthcare. By preventing bruising and contamination, plastic packaging reduces food waste. Plastic cups and dishes are less fragile than ceramic tableware. PVC pipes and window frames have made house-building cheaper. But not everyone who benefits from this wonder material knows that plastics production requires huge amounts of energy, most of which is generated by burning fossil fuels. Plastics plants are also a source of harmful pollutants including benzene. Nor do all consumers appreciate the extent to which plastic
Tourism is a lopsided industry in most countries, and Taiwan is no exception. On some days, certain places are packed out with visitors, while others hardly ever see an excursionist. It’s probably true to say that tourism is even more uneven in Changhua County than in other counties or municipalities. Almost everyone has toured the famous temples and old streets of Lukang (鹿港), but how many readers of the Taipei Times have set foot in Jhutang (竹塘) or Sijhou (溪州), rural townships on the north bank of the Jhuoshuei River (濁水溪)? Not many people live in Jhutang — fewer than 14,600