March 21 to March 27
“I’d rather jump into the Tamsui River!” was once a common saying for Taipei residents. By 1987, however, nothing was worth plunging into its putrid, garbage-strewn waters.
Although large-scale human activity and settlement had been taking a toll on the river for over a century, Taiwan’s rapid industrialization in the 1960s and 1970s hastened its decline. And it wasn’t just factories. The river essentially became a public garbage dump as the Taipei area’s population exploded, and only in 1974 did the government introduce a limited and questionably enforced Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法).
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
A Taiwan Today article from July 1987 described how just 15 years earlier, hundreds of fishermen along the river regularly hauled in enough to support their families, and tourists flocked to its banks to sample local delicacies.
“No one comes here for boating now, and very few fish can survive in it, not even crabs,” a ship captain said.
Local restaurants only dared to serve seafood caught in the ocean.
Photo courtesy of Academia Sinica
“Yes, I am still fond of this river, but I will never taste anything from it,” a resident told Taiwan Today.
A Chinese Television Service clip from March 27, 1987 shows National Taiwan University students launching a “Save the Tamsui River” petition drive to push the government to do something about the deteriorating river. More than 1 million people signed it in less than a month, and the government launched that year the first of many Tamsui River cleaning projects.
It worked — to a certain degree. An Environmental Information Center article from 2007 states, “at least the number of severely polluted sections have decreased.”
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The problem hasn’t been entirely fixed. A CommonWealth Magazine (天下) investigation showed that 127 factories were fined in 2020 for illegally dumping industrial sewage into the Tamsui river system. Last March, the New Taipei City government pledged to completely eliminate the river’s water pollution by 2030 — adding to the list of many clean up targets the authorities are supposed to achieve that year.
POLLUTION FRENZY
The government responded to public pressure by finally implementing its long-delayed Tamsui River cleaning plan in April 1987. The first goal, set for 1991, was to eliminate the river’s foul odors during the hot summer months.
“Everyone was fixated on fixing the Tamsui river,” a Taiwan Panorama (台灣光華) article said. The resuscitation of South Korea’s Han River and Kaohsiung’s Love River led people to ask: “Why can’t Taipei do it too?”
A Taiwan Today article noted that the pollution was 65 percent domestic wastewater and sewage, 18 percent industrial runoff, 14 percent animal farm waste and 3 percent leakage from nearby landfills or garbage facilities.
Pigs, geese, ducks and chickens were housed directly on the riverside, their carcasses and feces directly washing into the waterbody. Trucks dumped construction waste and city trash into it. Rampant pesticide use, reckless logging and habitat destruction, coal washing, illegal sand and rock harvesting and irresponsible tourists were just a few among the long list of culprits.
Taipei had the Neihu Landfill, nicknamed “garbage hill,” and moved to further prevent leakage, but in New Taipei, most waste was still dumped into the river. Nobody wanted a landfill near them, while the area’s incinerators were still under construction.
The government’s ability to fight the pollution was limited as most of the area’s households weren’t connected to the sewage system; it was a cumbersome procedure that wasn’t high on people’s list of priorities.
ONGOING EFFORT
Stricter laws were needed too. Before 1984, the water pollution law only applied to mines and industrial factories, and the rows of small, family-run operations along the shore could discharge with abandon. Hospitals and laboratories even dumped their waste into the river.
There needed to be a shift in perception that “the river is not a ditch,” Taiwan Panorama wrote. If cleaned up, the riverside could become a charming recreational area.
Then-Department of Health (today’s Ministry of Health and Welfare) head Shih Chun-jen (施純仁) told Taiwan Panorama, “For a chronically ill patient to get better, in addition to medical help, care from relatives is also very important.”
“If your family has a factory, will you invest in reducing pollution? Or will you ignore the law and set money aside for fines? If you are fined, will you go to your local councilman and convince him to get you out of it?” Taiwan Panorama quoted him as asking. “If we want a clean river, then we have to increase our standard of living first.”
A 1991 Taiwan Today article blamed both the people and the government on the slow progress. The problems were myriad: property owners by the riverside were unwilling to give up or sell their land, and at first the Environmental Protection Agency only had one person assigned to the entire project. That number was later increased to five.
A 1997 report showed that most Taipei households were connected to the sewage system, but not New Taipei City or Keelung. This is an ongoing effort, and in 2020, but according to a CommonWealth Magazine report, there were still 2.9 million unconnected households in the region. This wastewater — and illegal industrial activity — continues to be the main polluter of the river today.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that either have anniversaries this week or are tied to current events.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
RSS