It always nice to bask in the warm afterglow of another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) fubar, this time the defeat of all four of the referendums that it had promoted and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had opposed.
The DPP displayed competence, changing strategies when it needed to and effectively motivating its somewhat younger base than the KMT, a base that is more likely to live far from where it has household registry than the older KMT base and thus, is more difficult to get out. Kudos to the DPP.
This was a performance that Taiwan needed: the ractopamine pork referendum might have caused unnecessary trouble with US, while re-opening the dilapidated and dangerous fourth nuclear plant was simply a bad idea. A defeat for the DPP might have invigorated the KMT as well; certainly it would have given that ally of Beijing an additional club with which to bash the pro-Taiwan side.
Photo: Liu Hsin-te, Taipei Times
Years ago, the midwife of Taiwan’s democracy, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), remarked that if he was Moses leading Taiwan out of bondage, then Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who succeeded him as president, was Joshua, leading Taiwan into the promised land. Lee, who used to criss-cross the island giving sermons on humility and public service, understood his place in history. But if the story of Taiwan’s democratization contains a Joshua to Lee’s Moses, that figure is President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), not Chen.
CULTIVATING RELATIONS
At home, Tsai has presided over a consolidation of the nation’s democracy with successful, clean, regular, even dull elections. Abroad, her calm demeanor and cultivation of good relations with the US and Japan and pursuit of relations with the world by other means has elevated Taiwan’s stance in the world, such as its city-to-city initiatives, highlighted last Wednesday in the Taipei Times (“Cities can expand Taiwan’s role,” Marcin Jerzewski and Huynh Tam Sang).
Photo: Lee Hui-chou, Taipei Times
As much as by what she has done, Tsai’s success has been defined by what she has not done, by things that didn’t happen. In February of 2008, as his presidency was in its final year, Chen flew out to Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), ostensibly for the opening ceremony of an airstrip there. It was a useless stunt that drew unnecessary attention to the island claims of the Republic of China (ROC). A piece in the international media called it a “stick-in-your-eye move by Chen” to the other South China Sea claimants, one that, even worse, aligned Taiwan with China.
Tsai has never engaged in stunts like that. Instead, she has made the ROC’s absurd and dangerous South China Sea claims largely disappear from public and international discourse. They have largely been a non-controversy.
Similarly, during the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) era, the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) were a prominent irritant in relations between Taipei and Tokyo.
Aside from a couple of pro forma assertions of ROC sovereignty over the isles (most recently in June of last year), they too have gone into hibernation. Instead, on Friday the DPP and its counterpart ruling party in Japan, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), had another 2+2 meeting to discuss trade. The meeting was just another signal of the warm relations between the two states.
China’s aggression, expansionism, and arrogant blustering, of course, are partly responsible for Taiwan’s surging profile on the world stage. Yet, it is easy to imagine what stunts Chen might have pulled with a similarly fecund ground to till, how he might have chilled support and drawn attention to himself rather than Taiwan. Instead, Tsai’s low profile has enabled Taiwan to shine.
SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION
At home, Tsai and Taiwan’s democracy have both been helped by China’s threats toward the nation, which have helped build a Taiwanese identity and make it increasingly difficult for the KMT, allied to Beijing, to compete at the national level.
Yet, Tsai served as DPP chair during the bleak opening years of the Ma era, when the DPP had to rebuild after the Chen chased the golden calf and Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) lost in the 2008 election. That period was also vital for another reason — it saw the transition of the party from the period when it had been led by the older generation of dissidents and lawyers to its current generation of leaders.
Had the DPP fallen apart at that time, things might have gone ill for Taiwan and its democracy.
Instead, as scholar Austin Wang observed in “The Emergence of Tsai Ing-wen and the Presidentialization of DPP, 2008-2016,” Tsai beat back the party factions and their centrifugal tendencies that threatened to tear the party apart and centralized the DPP into a machine led by the president. Again, Tsai should be honored for what didn’t happen.
A less remarked on aspect of Tsai’s effect on Taiwan’s democracy: I know women who had voted blue their whole lives, who switched to voting for Tsai because she was a female (will they switch back in 2024?). When voters switch parties, it opens up new possibilities. Tsai’s light blue appeal is not limited to females: for a brief moment in 2008 she was mentioned as a possible running mate for Ma!
Remember too when DPP elder Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏) ran against Tsai for DPP chairperson in 2008, saying that unmarried women shouldn’t lead? Few publicly say that anymore. Tsai struck a blow against sexism in politics.
‘WE VOTE’
During the Ma years, the nation became ever more Taiwanese even as he tried to nudge it closer to China. Tsai was the DPP leader during that period and its presidential candidate during the 2012 campaign. Nicknamed “Little Ing” (小英) during that election, it would not have been difficult, with good marketing, for her to try to get herself identified with the party and the cause, personality-cult style. She avoided attempting that, which would have been very damaging for the party and for Taiwan’s democracy.
Last week I asked my students how they knew they were Taiwanese. One young woman promptly offered: “We vote.” Voting, like the round the island bicycle ride, has become more than just a way to select leaders, it is now a form of participation in the Taiwanese identity.
That is due, in part, to Tsai’s quiet, competent management of the way the DPP and Taiwan’s democracy have interacted for the last 13 years, avoiding all the things that might have happened, but didn’t.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Last week the Economist (“A short history of Taiwan and China, in maps,” July 10) and Al Jazeera both sent around short explainers of the Taiwan-China issue. The Al Jazeera explainer, which discussed the Cold War and the rivalry between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC), began in the postwar era with US intervention in the Chinese Civil War and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) retreat to Taiwan. It was fairly standard, and it works because it appeals to the well-understood convention that Taiwan enters history in 1949 when the KMT retreats to it. Very different, and far
To step through the gates of the Lukang Folk Arts Museum (鹿港民俗文物館) is to step back 100 years and experience the opulent side of colonial Taiwan. The beautifully maintained mansion set amid a manicured yard is a prime example of the architecture in vogue among wealthy merchants of the day. To set foot inside the mansion itself is to step even further into the past, into the daily lives of Hokkien settlers under Qing rule in Taiwan. This museum should be on anyone’s must-see list in Lukang (鹿港), whether for its architectural spledor or its cultural value. The building was commissioned
Like many people juggling long hours at work, Chiharu Shimoda sought companionship via a dating app. For two months, he exchanged messages with five or six potential partners, but it wasn’t long before he was seeking out just one — a 24-year-old named Miku. Three months later, they got married. The catch: Miku is an AI bot. And Shimoda knew that from day one. The 52-year-old factory worker is one of over 5,000 users of Loverse, a year-old app that allows interaction only with generative artificial intelligence. Shimoda’s also among a much bigger cohort of people who’ve either given up or
July 15 to July 21 Depending on who you ask, Taiwan Youth (台灣青年) was a magazine that either spoke out against Japanese colonialism, espoused Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ideology or promoted Taiwanese independence. That’s because three publications with contrasting ideologies, all bearing the same Chinese name, were established between 1920 and 1960. Curiously, none of them originated in Taiwan. The best known is probably The Tai Oan Chheng Lian, launched on July 16, 1920 by Taiwanese students in Tokyo as part of the growing non-violent resistance movement against Japanese colonial rule. A crucial part of the effort was to promote Taiwanese