In almost every part of the world, the mean sea level (MSL) is rising for three reasons, all of which are linked to the planet getting hotter. Firstly, water expands as it heats up. Secondly, glaciers around the world are in retreat. Thirdly, the ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica are shrinking, and scientists fear they could collapse with catastrophic consequences for oceanfront cities throughout the world.
In August last year, the Taiwan branch of Greenpeace, the global non-governmental environmental organization, warned that, by 2050, close to 4 percent of the country’s land could be inundated due to rising sea levels.
Greenpeace’s statements were widely reported in local media, including the Taipei Times. The NGO’s claim that Tainan is likely to be the first of several cities and counties to suffer serious losses is backed by online sea-level simulators like: flood.firetree.net.
Photo: Steven Crook
Not only are the seas rising, but the speed with which they’re rising is increasing. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Web site, the annual average increase in global MSL between 1880 and 2013 was 1.5mm. Since 1993, however, the average rise per year has been 3 to 3.6mm.
Moreover, the rate varies from one region to another. The reasons for this include subsidence (a serious problem in parts of southwestern Taiwan), ocean currents and what’s called “Ice Age Rebound” — the speed at which land lifts or sinks as it recovers from compression due to the immense weight of glaciation.
SEA LEVEL RISE: A COMPLICATED PICTURE
Photo: Steven Crook
Last year, Greenpeace asserted that the MSL around Taiwan is rising at double the global average. This claim has been repeated by several media outlets, but the scientific picture is more complicated.
According to the summary of Taiwan Climate Change Science Report 2017: Physical Phenomena and Mechanisms (authored by experts from Academia Sinica, National Taiwan University and other institutions): “From 1993 to 2012, the sea-level rise rate in the western Pacific was about three times higher than the global average, while the rate in the eastern Pacific was below the global average.”
The 554-page report’s section on rising seas cites several sets of data. One, published by the Central Weather Bureau in 2014 and based on tidal gauges at Kaohsiung, Keelung, Suao and Tamsui, showed that between 1994 and 2013, MSLs in those places rose by an average 3.4mm per year. The report notes this is “quite close to the global average sea level rise from 1993 to 2010 announced by the Fifth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of 2.8mm to 3.6mm per year.”
Photo: Steven Crook
Also referenced in the report was a study led by Tseng Yu-heng (曾于恒) of National Taiwan University’s Institute of Oceanography. Drawing on satellite altimetry data, Tseng’s team concluded that, at points in and near Taiwan (such as China’s Xiamen and Naha in Okinawa, Japan), sea levels rose by 5.3mm per year between 1993 and 2003. Their 2009 paper pointed out that this was roughly consistent with tide-gauge records, which had recorded an annual average rise of 5.7mm.
More recently, a team from National Taiwan Ocean University predicted that MSLs at four central Taiwan townships would rise by an average 2.8mm per year, or by a total 5.8cm, between last year and 2039. They categorized Wuci District (梧棲) in Taichung and three townships — Lukang (鹿港) in Changhua County and Mailiao (麥寮) and Taisi (臺西) in Yunlin County — as unusually susceptible to a rising ocean due to topography, subsidence and other factors.
On this issue, however, the devil isn’t in such details, but in the bigger picture.
Photo: Lu Hsien-hsiu, Taipei Times
The oceans are undoubtedly rising. As one of the world’s most densely populated countries, Taiwan can’t afford to lose dry land. Taiwanese therefore have compelling reasons to both drastically scale back their carbon dioxide emissions, and build resilience in low-lying communities.
The Projected Economic Impact of Extreme Sea-Level Rise in Seven Asian Cities in 2030 (published by Greenpeace in June) warns that large parts of Taiwan’s capital could soon be in danger of inundation if a storm surge coincides with torrential rainfall and a high tide: “About 17 percent of Taipei’s land area is below the level to which sea water could rise should a ten-year flood occur in 2030, under an RCP8.5 scenario [the so-called ‘business as usual’ scenario, in which humanity does little to curb climate change]... Datong District (大同) and Taipei Main Station could potentially be flooded.”
TYPHOON NARI: WAKE-UP CALL
In September 2001, Typhoon Nari gave Taipei residents a glimpse of that kind of future. After Nari, it took three months for the Taipei Metro to fully return to normal services.
Last year, a group of scientists alerted the authorities to the possibility that climate change could force the government to move out of Taipei.
One of them, Wang Chung-ho (汪中和), a researcher at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Earth Sciences, said that, as soon as the second half of the 21st century, the Taipei Basin could become “unsuitable for human settlement.” In the short term, Wang explained, embankments and dikes would prevent sea water from inundating the capital, but a rising ocean would make it ever more difficult for rainwater to drain from the basin, resulting in ever more serious waterlogging.
ACTION DOWN SOUTH
Recognizing the crisis that faces Taiwan’s coastal areas, Tainan is taking a proactive approach to the impact of extreme weather, says Hsieh Shih-chieh (謝世傑), director-general of the city government’s Environmental Protection Bureau.
Witnessed by representatives of Greenpeace, Tainan Mayor Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) signed the Tainan Climate Emergency Declaration on May 11. The document sets out various targets for 2030, including boosting renewables, making the urban bus fleet 100-percent electric and cutting overall greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions by a further 20 percent.
Hsieh says that, between 2010 and 2019, Tainan’s overall GHG emissions fell by 21 percent, and that the city aims to become carbon neutral by 2050. (By comparison, London, Berlin and Madrid have lowered GHG emissions by around 30 percent since emissions peaked in those cities; Copenhagen has achieved a striking 61-percent cut.)
Other preparations for rising sea levels include the restoration of coastal sandbanks, clearing silt from lagoons, installing sensors on roads prone to flooding and adding automated pumping stations.
Asked if Tainan plans to build additional coastal defenses to hold back a rising ocean, Han Rong-hua (韓榮華), director of the city government’s Water Resources Bureau, says that the construction of seawalls is the responsibility of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Water Resources Agency.
Han doesn’t expect sea water to intrude in the next few decades, saying the height of existing dikes along Tainan’s coastline is sufficient to hold back predicted high tides for the next 50 years. Rather than build new seawalls, he adds, the focus is on maintenance to ensure existing defenses function as intended.
In at least one sense, that’s good news. Constructing additional seawalls would involve pouring a great deal of concrete, and that in turn would add yet more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change and sea-level rise.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Seven hundred job applications. One interview. Marco Mascaro arrived in Taiwan last year with a PhD in engineering physics and years of experience at a European research center. He thought his Gold Card would guarantee him a foothold in Taiwan’s job market. “It’s marketed as if Taiwan really needs you,” the 33-year-old Italian says. “The reality is that companies here don’t really need us.” The Employment Gold Card was designed to fix Taiwan’s labor shortage by offering foreign professionals a combined resident visa and open work permit valid for three years. But for many, like Mascaro, the welcome mat ends at the door. A
Last week gave us the droll little comedy of People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) consul general in Osaka posting a threat on X in response to Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi saying to the Diet that a Chinese attack on Taiwan may be an “existential threat” to Japan. That would allow Japanese Self Defence Forces to respond militarily. The PRC representative then said that if a “filthy neck sticks itself in uninvited, we will cut it off without a moment’s hesitation. Are you prepared for that?” This was widely, and probably deliberately, construed as a threat to behead Takaichi, though it
If China attacks, will Taiwanese be willing to fight? Analysts of certain types obsess over questions like this, especially military analysts and those with an ax to grind as to whether Taiwan is worth defending, or should be cut loose to appease Beijing. Fellow columnist Michael Turton in “Notes from Central Taiwan: Willing to fight for the homeland” (Nov. 6, page 12) provides a superb analysis of this topic, how it is used and manipulated to political ends and what the underlying data shows. The problem is that most analysis is centered around polling data, which as Turton observes, “many of these
Since Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair on Oct. 18, she has become a polarizing figure. Her supporters see her as a firebrand critic of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while others, including some in her own party, have charged that she is Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) preferred candidate and that her election was possibly supported by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPP) unit for political warfare and international influence, the “united front.” Indeed, Xi quickly congratulated Cheng upon her election. The 55-year-old former lawmaker and ex-talk show host, who was sworn in on Nov.
RSS