In almost every part of the world, the mean sea level (MSL) is rising for three reasons, all of which are linked to the planet getting hotter. Firstly, water expands as it heats up. Secondly, glaciers around the world are in retreat. Thirdly, the ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica are shrinking, and scientists fear they could collapse with catastrophic consequences for oceanfront cities throughout the world.
In August last year, the Taiwan branch of Greenpeace, the global non-governmental environmental organization, warned that, by 2050, close to 4 percent of the country’s land could be inundated due to rising sea levels.
Greenpeace’s statements were widely reported in local media, including the Taipei Times. The NGO’s claim that Tainan is likely to be the first of several cities and counties to suffer serious losses is backed by online sea-level simulators like: flood.firetree.net.
Photo: Steven Crook
Not only are the seas rising, but the speed with which they’re rising is increasing. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Web site, the annual average increase in global MSL between 1880 and 2013 was 1.5mm. Since 1993, however, the average rise per year has been 3 to 3.6mm.
Moreover, the rate varies from one region to another. The reasons for this include subsidence (a serious problem in parts of southwestern Taiwan), ocean currents and what’s called “Ice Age Rebound” — the speed at which land lifts or sinks as it recovers from compression due to the immense weight of glaciation.
SEA LEVEL RISE: A COMPLICATED PICTURE
Photo: Steven Crook
Last year, Greenpeace asserted that the MSL around Taiwan is rising at double the global average. This claim has been repeated by several media outlets, but the scientific picture is more complicated.
According to the summary of Taiwan Climate Change Science Report 2017: Physical Phenomena and Mechanisms (authored by experts from Academia Sinica, National Taiwan University and other institutions): “From 1993 to 2012, the sea-level rise rate in the western Pacific was about three times higher than the global average, while the rate in the eastern Pacific was below the global average.”
The 554-page report’s section on rising seas cites several sets of data. One, published by the Central Weather Bureau in 2014 and based on tidal gauges at Kaohsiung, Keelung, Suao and Tamsui, showed that between 1994 and 2013, MSLs in those places rose by an average 3.4mm per year. The report notes this is “quite close to the global average sea level rise from 1993 to 2010 announced by the Fifth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of 2.8mm to 3.6mm per year.”
Photo: Steven Crook
Also referenced in the report was a study led by Tseng Yu-heng (曾于恒) of National Taiwan University’s Institute of Oceanography. Drawing on satellite altimetry data, Tseng’s team concluded that, at points in and near Taiwan (such as China’s Xiamen and Naha in Okinawa, Japan), sea levels rose by 5.3mm per year between 1993 and 2003. Their 2009 paper pointed out that this was roughly consistent with tide-gauge records, which had recorded an annual average rise of 5.7mm.
More recently, a team from National Taiwan Ocean University predicted that MSLs at four central Taiwan townships would rise by an average 2.8mm per year, or by a total 5.8cm, between last year and 2039. They categorized Wuci District (梧棲) in Taichung and three townships — Lukang (鹿港) in Changhua County and Mailiao (麥寮) and Taisi (臺西) in Yunlin County — as unusually susceptible to a rising ocean due to topography, subsidence and other factors.
On this issue, however, the devil isn’t in such details, but in the bigger picture.
Photo: Lu Hsien-hsiu, Taipei Times
The oceans are undoubtedly rising. As one of the world’s most densely populated countries, Taiwan can’t afford to lose dry land. Taiwanese therefore have compelling reasons to both drastically scale back their carbon dioxide emissions, and build resilience in low-lying communities.
The Projected Economic Impact of Extreme Sea-Level Rise in Seven Asian Cities in 2030 (published by Greenpeace in June) warns that large parts of Taiwan’s capital could soon be in danger of inundation if a storm surge coincides with torrential rainfall and a high tide: “About 17 percent of Taipei’s land area is below the level to which sea water could rise should a ten-year flood occur in 2030, under an RCP8.5 scenario [the so-called ‘business as usual’ scenario, in which humanity does little to curb climate change]... Datong District (大同) and Taipei Main Station could potentially be flooded.”
TYPHOON NARI: WAKE-UP CALL
In September 2001, Typhoon Nari gave Taipei residents a glimpse of that kind of future. After Nari, it took three months for the Taipei Metro to fully return to normal services.
Last year, a group of scientists alerted the authorities to the possibility that climate change could force the government to move out of Taipei.
One of them, Wang Chung-ho (汪中和), a researcher at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Earth Sciences, said that, as soon as the second half of the 21st century, the Taipei Basin could become “unsuitable for human settlement.” In the short term, Wang explained, embankments and dikes would prevent sea water from inundating the capital, but a rising ocean would make it ever more difficult for rainwater to drain from the basin, resulting in ever more serious waterlogging.
ACTION DOWN SOUTH
Recognizing the crisis that faces Taiwan’s coastal areas, Tainan is taking a proactive approach to the impact of extreme weather, says Hsieh Shih-chieh (謝世傑), director-general of the city government’s Environmental Protection Bureau.
Witnessed by representatives of Greenpeace, Tainan Mayor Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) signed the Tainan Climate Emergency Declaration on May 11. The document sets out various targets for 2030, including boosting renewables, making the urban bus fleet 100-percent electric and cutting overall greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions by a further 20 percent.
Hsieh says that, between 2010 and 2019, Tainan’s overall GHG emissions fell by 21 percent, and that the city aims to become carbon neutral by 2050. (By comparison, London, Berlin and Madrid have lowered GHG emissions by around 30 percent since emissions peaked in those cities; Copenhagen has achieved a striking 61-percent cut.)
Other preparations for rising sea levels include the restoration of coastal sandbanks, clearing silt from lagoons, installing sensors on roads prone to flooding and adding automated pumping stations.
Asked if Tainan plans to build additional coastal defenses to hold back a rising ocean, Han Rong-hua (韓榮華), director of the city government’s Water Resources Bureau, says that the construction of seawalls is the responsibility of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Water Resources Agency.
Han doesn’t expect sea water to intrude in the next few decades, saying the height of existing dikes along Tainan’s coastline is sufficient to hold back predicted high tides for the next 50 years. Rather than build new seawalls, he adds, the focus is on maintenance to ensure existing defenses function as intended.
In at least one sense, that’s good news. Constructing additional seawalls would involve pouring a great deal of concrete, and that in turn would add yet more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change and sea-level rise.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
April 14 to April 20 In March 1947, Sising Katadrepan urged the government to drop the “high mountain people” (高山族) designation for Indigenous Taiwanese and refer to them as “Taiwan people” (台灣族). He considered the term derogatory, arguing that it made them sound like animals. The Taiwan Provincial Government agreed to stop using the term, stating that Indigenous Taiwanese suffered all sorts of discrimination and oppression under the Japanese and were forced to live in the mountains as outsiders to society. Now, under the new regime, they would be seen as equals, thus they should be henceforth
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
The other day, a friend decided to playfully name our individual roles within the group: planner, emotional support, and so on. I was the fault-finder — or, as she put it, “the grumpy teenager” — who points out problems, but doesn’t suggest alternatives. She was only kidding around, but she struck at an insecurity I have: that I’m unacceptably, intolerably negative. My first instinct is to stress-test ideas for potential flaws. This critical tendency serves me well professionally, and feels true to who I am. If I don’t enjoy a film, for example, I don’t swallow my opinion. But I sometimes worry