If concrete were a country, it would be the third largest emitter of greenhouse gases on Earth, behind only China and the US.
How can this material, essential for global housing, construction and infrastructure, be made less damaging to the planet?
Cement is the most utilized material on Earth, consumed to make concrete at a rate of some 150 tonnes each second.
Photo: AFP
According to the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), around 14 billion cubic meters of concrete are cast each year.
Cement production alone accounts for as much as seven percent of global CO2 emissions — three times the emissions produced by aviation.
“That’s more than all the emissions from the European Union or India, just behind those of China and the US,” Valerie Masson-Delmotte, a key contributor to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said. And with ever-growing urbanization rates in Africa and Asia, the planetary impact of this elementary building material is only likely to grow.
Photo: Bloomberg
Cement is the main binder that holds together the pebbles and stones in concrete. It is primarily made of clinker, a residue produced by firing clay and limestone in a furnace. When it is heated, CO2 is produced.
In order to manufacture one tonne of cement, the process of firing to 1,400 degrees Celsius produces roughly one tonne of CO2.
This chemical reaction, which has stayed unaltered since cement was first manufactured over 200 years ago, is responsible for 70 percent of the sector’s emissions.
Photo: REUTERS
The remaining 30 percent comes from the energy used to fire the furnaces themselves.
REDUCING EMISSIONS?
The concrete industry has said it wants to be carbon neutral by 2050. In October it set the objective of reducing its emissions “an additional 25 percent” by 2030.
This would save some five billion tonnes of CO2 over the course of the decade. Purging the sector of CO2 emissions is heavily reliant on technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCUS) which have yet to be deployed at any meaningful scale. But it also proposes changes such as recycling old concrete and replacing hydrocarbons in its blast furnaces with biofuels.
State-run behemoths such as the China National Building Material Company have promised to “play their part” in the industry’s decarbonization.
At the other end of the scale, several start-ups are coming up with new ways to save emissions.
US-based Solidia plans to capture CO2 and use it to dry out the concrete mix, minimizing the amount of water needed in production. In Canada, CarbonCure is exploring how to inject liquified CO2 into concrete and store it there.
‘GREEN CEMENT’
Perhaps most importantly, the industry is banking on developing new “green” cements, made from recycled materials.
In Britain, 26 percent of concrete is already manufactured in this way, according to the GCCA.
In May, France, which is home to several major concrete firms, issued new cement production regulations.
Starting next year, all new buildings will be subject to carbon restrictions for the duration of their lives, from construction to demolition.
As things stand, most green cements are being made by new producers; traditional manufacturers say it will take time for them to modernize their existing machinery.
One such start up, Hoffman Green Cement, makes cement in France from industrial waste: clay sludge, blast furnace slag and fly ash, which is a by-product from coal burning.
Even with a price tag 25 euros (US$29) more expensive per square metre, demand is high, says founder Julien Blanchard.
“The cement industry plans to eliminate its emissions in 2050,” he said. “With our breakthrough solutions, we can get them starting now.”
The stakes for the planet are high: the UN estimates that three quarters of the world’s infrastructure by 2050 has yet to be built.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
Peter Brighton was amazed when he found the giant jackfruit. He had been watching it grow on his farm in far north Queensland, and when it came time to pick it from the tree, it was so heavy it needed two people to do the job. “I was surprised when we cut it off and felt how heavy it was,” he says. “I grabbed it and my wife cut it — couldn’t do it by myself, it took two of us.” Weighing in at 45 kilograms, it is the heaviest jackfruit that Brighton has ever grown on his tropical fruit farm, located