I’d like to marry my girlfriend, a Filipino migrant worker, and have her move in with me as my wife. In most countries this would be a matter of paperwork. In Taiwan it’s not possible.
A few weeks ago I set off for the immigration office in Taichung’s Fongyuan District (豐原) to ask how to switch my girlfriend’s foreign laborer visa to a relative visa after we got married.
We can easily marry in Taiwan — in that respect Taiwan is the sanest place I have ever been. We just have to show up at the local household registration office with proof from our home nations that we’re not presently married, and the whole process can be done in minutes. It is the same for divorce, if both parties agree.
Photo courtesy of New Palace
The issue is getting her visa changed. I have a great job in Taichung that I really love, and I do not want to move to Hsinchu’s Jhubei City (竹北), where she works in a factory, to live with a woman who comes home at 8:40pm five nights a week, exhausted after a brutal 14 hour day.
My first stop, the immigration office in Fongyuan, laid it all out for me very clearly. The very nice immigration officer explained that if they cannot do it in-country: “She has to leave the country and go through a process at the Taiwan Representative Office in Manila. Then she can come back in on a relative visa.”
At that point I stopped him.
“You do know that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is not granting any new residency visas, right? So if she leaves the country she can’t come back in.”
He did his deer-in-the-headlights imitation. “What? Really?” Then he shouted back to his supervisor to ask if this was true. She hadn’t known and came over to confirm this wondrous new fact with me.
Imagine what might have happened if I hadn’t known that fact.
Last week I continued my quest with a quick strike at the MOFA office in central Taichung. There the low-level worker at the window gave me the same information. After he told me she would have to leave the country, I cut in, “But then she can’t come back, right? MOFA isn’t giving out new residency visas.”
He laughed sheepishly. “Oh yeah, that’s right.” I pressed the issue, and they brought in the supervisor.
We had a long talk. It wasn’t a MOFA issue, she explained. No, we do not do it here. See if you can switch it at the National Immigration Agency (NIA), she suggested. I told her I’d already been there. She asked which one, and then told me that those guys in Fongyuan are sometimes a bit uninformed.
“Go ask the main office just off Wenxin Road. If they will accept it, it can be done.”
But she warned me that because my girlfriend was a Southeast Asian, it might be less possible, a comment I had heard her make when she was chatting about my situation with her coworkers.
This was a bit confusing to me, since I know that MOFA and not the NIA gives visas, but I headed over there anyway, only to be told that MOFA does in fact issue visas. The very nice lady there commiserated with me. “You will just have to wait until things get back to normal.”
It has now been 18 long months since Taiwan shut its borders due to COVID-19. In all that long span of time MOFA has not established an alternative that allows people already here to switch to new visas inside Taiwan. It has simply shrugged its shoulders and blamed COVID, as if the situation were the result of natural law, not amenable to human action.
I am hardly the only person in some variant of this situation. An acquaintance of mine is a North American who wants to marry a woman from Thailand, here as a student. Same problem — she has to return to Thailand in order to switch her visa, and won’t be able to re-enter.
After over a year of complaints, last month the government grudgingly permitted spouses and children of Republic of China (ROC) nationals to enter Taiwan for humanitarian reasons, under the rubric of “joining family.”
This refusal to create an alternative visa mechanism is not a COVID issue. This is a problem of deep bureaucratic indifference, incompetence and racism. The government knows perfectly well that if foreign workers can marry and switch their visas to relative visas in Taiwan, some will leave their factory work.
Because few new workers are entering Taiwan, migrant workers are in high demand, especially with the export side of the economy booming (in your daily experience the economy may be stagnant, but government spreadsheets show that economic growth this year has been the fastest in a decade).
Hence, this lack of a simple mechanism for switching visas in Taiwan functions to keep migrant workers in their job. Bureaucrats can simply shrug, as the immigration official did, and declare they are too low on the totem pole to change things. The high cost of quarantine also helps reduce the ability of individuals from less developed nations to travel in and out as well.
The assumption that at some point things will return to normal is highly problematic. COVID-19 isn’t going to go away any time soon. Given the anti-vax stances of so many individuals, it is likely that reservoirs of unvaccinated people will exist in many nations, churning out new variants and new breakthrough clusters.
Some nations, especially those run by incompetent autocrats or experiencing political turmoil, will be unable to bring the disease under control. COVID-19 is not going to be like AIDS, the disease of a few unlucky people, but more like tuberculosis in the 19th century, a constant malevolent presence in our lives.
It is time for MOFA to wake up and smell the Kafka. People seeking to be married are but one subset of the people who need the ability to smoothly switch their visas in-country. MOFA needs to set up a facility to do this, and pronto. A country that is suffering a population decline should be making it easier, not impossible, for people to marry and have children.
The current lack of this facility is just one part of a severe problem across Taiwan and its interface with the outside world — while Taiwan frequently represents itself as a place where it is easy to do business, or open a business, carry out banking, etc, foreigners who attempt to do these things report the opposite.
For a nation whose continued existence depends on robust, diverse connections with the world outside, this discontinuity between what is seen in the mirror and what is experienced by outsiders could well be fatal.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
A short walk beneath the dense Amazon canopy, the forest abruptly opens up. Fallen logs are rotting, the trees grow sparser and the temperature rises in places sunlight hits the ground. This is what 24 years of severe drought looks like in the world’s largest rainforest. But this patch of degraded forest, about the size of a soccer field, is a scientific experiment. Launched in 2000 by Brazilian and British scientists, Esecaflor — short for “Forest Drought Study Project” in Portuguese — set out to simulate a future in which the changing climate could deplete the Amazon of rainfall. It is
What does the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in the Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) era stand for? What sets it apart from their allies, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)? With some shifts in tone and emphasis, the KMT’s stances have not changed significantly since the late 2000s and the era of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) current platform formed in the mid-2010s under the guidance of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and current President William Lai (賴清德) campaigned on continuity. Though their ideological stances may be a bit stale, they have the advantage of being broadly understood by the voters.
RSS