As we have come out of an era of silenced voices and confiscated photographs, we know the preciousness of those slivered shards of memory: the pieces of writing that were half-veiled critiques of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) authoritarian regime, trying to hide behind stock phrases that could not be construed as sedition, and yet bite; the faded and poorly-focused photographs were usually taken by amateurs, who yet were driven to capture the fleeting moment when a few foolhardy souls ventured to gather and join in protest.
The negatives and pictures, fading and molding in Taiwan’s humid climate as they lay for years in hidden and forgotten places, fared worse than the written record. For example, Chen Po-wen (陳博文), the main photographer during the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident (美麗島事件), ran an X-ray processing shop in Taichung where he could process his own photographs; as police moved in to arrest him early in the morning in December 1979, Chen hid photo negatives between stacks of large X-rays, not re-discovered until the late 1990’s.
These photographs have since been the basis for several exhibitions. Other photos have been released by the National Archives Administration to relatives of political prisoners, but are not generally available. These early photos are even more precious because of their scarcity, and they tell us more about human nature than words, as we witness, for example, the faint look of bravado on the face of a person facing the firing squad.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Foundation for Democracy
COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS
And now as we try to recover and transmit history, we face a new hurdle: copyright restrictions. Aside from the restrictions that claim to protect ownership for private parties, we face exaggerated privacy claims, such that names on documents from the national archives are often blacked out. So those who are motivated to research and write history face an obstacle course of legal, financial and administrative hurdles.
Now let me get specific. The Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD) was founded in 2003 at the request of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁); funding came from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The titular head was the KMT’s Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), the then-speaker of the Legislative Yuan. Kao Ying-mao (高英茂), a professor of political science, was named the director. TFD has been able to promote international recognition for Taiwan’s advance towards democracy, a considerable part of its new legitimation in international society.
Photo courtesy of Vinay Chen
The first activity of the TFD — “The Struggle for Democracy and Human Rights: A Journey of Remembrance and Appreciation”(感恩與巡禮: 國際友人對台灣民主與人權奮鬥的回顧) — was to invite back to Taiwan on Dec. 8 and Dec. 9, 2003, 30 foreign nationals who had been expelled in the period of martial law. The list of invitees was drawn up by Lynn Miles, who knew most of them from his years running an underground human rights network based in Osaka.
This program included some KMT-affiliated figures who were willing to come, such as KMT legislator John Chiang (蔣孝嚴), a son of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). It was an emotional moment when the elder sister of Chen Wen-cheng (陳文成), a mathematics professor from Pittsburgh found dead on July 3, 1981, the day after being taken in for questioning by the security agencies, addressed Chiang as a fellow family member of White Terror victims.
A further highlight was that US missionary Milo Thornberry and his wife Judith Thomas revealed that they had carried out the January 1970 escape of democracy pioneer Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) from house arrest in Taiwan — not the US Central Intelligence Agency, as many had assumed. My significant part was to insist that we make an enduring record of each person’s experience, on videotape.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Foundation for Democracy
Subsequently Lynn Miles and I used these for our 500-page, 2008 book, A Borrowed Voice: Taiwan Human Rights through International Networks, 1960-1980 (我的聲音借你: 台灣人權訴求與國際聯絡網). This book remains the main record of this history, and will be available for free download in English and Chinese next month through the Jing-Mei White Terror Memorial Park (白色恐怖景美紀念園區), under the title International Contributors to Taiwan Human Rights: vr360.nhrm.gov.tw/ftpp/.
HUMAN RIGHTS EXHIBITION
The Jing-mei White Terror Memorial Park last year began to plan an exhibition for December on the overseas contributors to Taiwan human rights, and asked me to be a consultant. Soon, however, the expanding pandemic nixed our plans for inviting the few surviving foreign participants. So I planned a colorful book to accompany the exhibit, and researched their later lives for an updated account. Then the contractor for the exhibit contacted the TFD, and was told none of the 2003 materials could be found; perhaps they were dumped during the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) presidency (2008-2016), when it was rumored that TFD itself barely survived.
The pictures were all on my computer, but it took considerable searching before I found the 2003 video interviews on CD’s stacked inside plastic crates on my porch — many soaked in a recent typhoon, but fortunately spared. The contractor made copies and gave them to TFD, and requested formal permission to use them.
And then I waited. That was over six months ago. After many internal pass-the-bucks the contractor was told that TFD legal consultants said that it could not provide permission because they do not hold permissions from those in the 2003 activity. But giving this specious excuse, thinking narrowly in terms of commercial copyright, TFD seems, more importantly, to be violating its mission to promote Taiwan’s image of liberty and democracy.
I just heard about this problem with TFD two weeks ago as I am almost finished, after about eight months’ work, putting together a 300-page book with biographies of nearly 90 participants, with most photos taken at the 2003 conference, then still relatively young and active. After consulting with several authors and reporters, I understand that use of pictures taken in public spaces do not require the permission of the persons whose picture is taken. Commercially, they belong to the photographer who has taken the picture, or to the institution that arranged for it.
However, I have learned from another historian that it is indeed very difficult to get any organization to sign off on permission to use photographs, if just perhaps because of bureaucratic inertia. Where the pictures can be paid for commercially, the process still takes considerable administrative time and effort. But government organizations in particular want to cover themselves from any potential indemnity and thus take a narrow interpretation for how written permissions should be provided for their publications with pictures.
Now I want to ask: who has the right to write history? And who is willing to spend the effort and is able to write history, if the doors to sources are closed?
I contend that we cannot treat historical materials like commercial property, in particular those dating from or dealing with Taiwan’s Martial Law era. It is not justified to say that these materials belong even to the leaders of the political movements of that time. Instead, they represent the mass phenomena of mobilization of thousands of people. And they are only meaningful if they are a legacy to the next generation. All institutions and holders should make these photographs open to public use. I intend to put all the photographs I hold onto a Web site with a statement that they can be used as public domain. We must create a rich historical record for future generations to freely read and see, if only they are willing.
Desperate dads meet in car parks to exchange packets; exhausted parents slip it into their kids’ drinks; families wait months for prescriptions buy it “off label.” But is it worth the risk? “The first time I gave him a gummy, I thought, ‘Oh my God, have I killed him?’ He just passed out in front of the TV. That never happens.” Jen remembers giving her son, David, six, melatonin to help him sleep. She got them from a friend, a pediatrician who gave them to her own child. “It was sort of hilarious. She had half a tub of gummies,
The wide-screen spectacle of Formula One gets a gleaming, rip-roaring workout in Joseph Kosinski’s F1, a fine-tuned machine of a movie that, in its most riveting racing scenes, approaches a kind of high-speed splendor. Kosinski, who last endeavored to put moviegoers in the seat of a fighter jet in Top Gun: Maverick, has moved to the open cockpits of Formula One with much the same affection, if not outright need, for speed. A lot of the same team is back. Jerry Bruckheimer produces. Ehren Kruger, a co-writer on Maverick, takes sole credit here. Hans Zimmer, a co-composer previously, supplies the thumping
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
RSS