Last week the news broke that Time magazine selected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) as one of the global top 100 emerging leaders, “individuals who are shaping the future.” Chiang, who will be 48 in a couple of weeks, heads a dying former authoritarian party that opposes independence for Taiwan and advocates annexing it to China, and is not so much shaping the future as trying to prevent it from happening.
Johnny Chiang? Can the reader name any of the half-dozen or so interim chairs the KMT has had since Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) resigned in 2005?
Comically, the Time explanation touts Chiang’s drive to make the party attractive to youth, a perennial demand of the rank and file. Anyone remember SKII? “Members of Super KMT II, which takes its name from SKII, a kind of cosmetic which claims to help maintain an appearance of youthfulness, vowed to become key reformers in the quest to bring young people back to the KMT.” Yeah, that’s from… 2005.
Photo: Aaron Tu, Taipei Times
As Courtney Donovan Smith calculated in a recent piece at Report.tw, Chiang’s youth drive has raised the under-40 contingent of KMT membership from three percent of overall party membership all the way to 3.5 percent. Apparently, young people would rather live in a free, democratic Taiwanese state, and support parties that advocate such outcomes.
Ironically, this “shaper of the future” does not perform well in the polls, and within his own party is less popular than several other figures, including recent hard-right returnee Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康). A poll this month from SET has KMT supporters preferring Jaw to any other candidate for chairman in the upcoming election. At the moment, it seems he has a hard fight ahead just to retain the chairmanship, let alone “shape the future.”
Chiang’s selection automatically begs the question of who from Taiwan would have been a better selection for the “leaders” category among the five categories named by Time (answer: practically any forward-looking person of stature). It also forces us to ask what it means to “shape the future.”
Photo: Chen Yu-fu, Taipei Times
Consider Freddy Lim (林昶佐), the former New Power Party (NPP) co-founder and star politician, who is also an internationally famed rock star (whereas Chiang, a legislator from a satellite town of Taichung, would be unknown were he not the chair of the KMT) and former head of Amnesty International in Taiwan. Lim is 44 this year, four years younger than Chiang. The party that Lim co-founded has pushed the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) into taking more progressive pro-Taiwan positions, thus affecting national policy.
Two recent examples of this, highlighted by Lev Nachman, a visiting scholar at National Taiwan University (NTU) who studies the nation’s small parties, are the recent proposals to change the passport design, and to force the KMT to change its emblem so it does not imitate the national emblem, a constant reminder of KMT colonialism and one-party rule. Nachman noted that these changes move the country away from its Republic of China (ROC) identity. These moves were opposed by Johnny Chiang’s KMT.
Or DPP politician Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), just a year older than Chiang. Currently Taiwan’s officially unofficial ambassador to the US, she is a major figure in the DPP and helps shape its foreign policy (and thus, stave off war in Asia). She is also internationally known, having served as vice president of Liberal International.
Photo courtesy of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the United States
One could go on and on, listing individuals in business, politics and the arts. Indeed, Time’s listicle of 100 random individuals from around the world merely reflects the old tradition that history is the story of famous individuals, of the actions and activities of Bonaparte, Buddha, Bach and Bacon.
It is striking, by contrast, to survey the KMT leadership and note how few have any standing outside Taiwan.
But who really shapes the future of Taiwan? A few days ago United Kingdom Export Finance announced that it had provided ￡200 million (NT$7.8 billion) in financing for wind energy development in Taiwan. Wind energy has the potential to save lives lost to toxins from burning coal, reduce pollution and stop human heating of the earth. It will change the way local power institutions view the provision of energy. Whoever constructed and approved that finance deal to support wind power here “shaped our future” far more than Johnny Chiang ever will.
Photo: Aaron Tu, Taipei Times
Or maybe it’s the endlessly shifting shaping of society by emerging social trends. Over the last decade or so Taiwanese have evolved new ways to experience their identity and relationship to the land of Taiwan, with the round-the-island bike ride now an important rite of passage. Another example of this is the way Aboriginal arts and culture are influencing Taiwanese identity, recently profiled in a Washington Post report.
As Taiwanese differentiate themselves from China, they reach for what is different within Taiwan. This accentuation of difference is an old pattern dating back to the authoritarian era, when locals asserted Taiwanese language and culture against the faux “Chinese” identity of the KMT. Three decades ago it was a sudden vogue for betel nut, now Aboriginal culture is in.
Yet no single person can be identified with this restless, rowdy drive for new sources of identity.
Then there is the government. Nothing shapes the nation’s future more than public policy choice. The influence of any individual fades before the power of agencies like the National Development Council and the Council on Agriculture, and state-run businesses such as Taipower or Taisugar. At every level of government, young policymakers reshape the future, fostering an increasingly Taiwan-centered government as they rise through the bureaucracy.
Or fail to shape. Slow-motion crises like the industrial land crisis and the water crisis continue. Across the island fragile, unstable hillsides are cleared for a season or two of cash crops, the capitalist version of slash and burn agriculture. The nation has an ongoing shortage of nurses. Our fishing industry, an international scandal, runs on chum, slavery and the lash. These too shape a future, auguring an unpleasant hellscape of persistent resource shortages and pervasive social inequity.
Again, what individual plays Aeolus to all these turbulent winds of change?
Maybe it’s the media. Maybe it’s marketers. Maybe it’s researchers and scientists. Maybe it’s Wall Street. Maybe it’s all some kind of deterministic chaos, from which patterns emerge for no reason and our attributions of causation are like whiskey, a comfort in the darkness.
Finally, the selection of the chairman of the KMT as a “shaper of the future” also compels us to ask, more practically, why international media organs based in democratic states keep lending support to a retrograde pro-China party that dreams of annexing the island to China, an act that would end media freedom in Taiwan.
Let us hope that is a future Johnny Chiang never has a chance to shape.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country.
Anyone who has been to Alishan (阿里山) is familiar with the railroad there: one line comes up from Chiayi City past the sacred tree site, while another line goes up to the sunrise viewing platform at Zhushan (祝山). Of course, as a center of logging operations for over 60 years, Alishan did have more rail lines in the past. Are any of these still around? Are they easily accessible? Are they worth visiting? The answer to all three of these questions is emphatically: Yes! One of these lines ran from Alishan all the way up to the base of Jade Mountain. Its
The only geopolitical certainty is that massive change is coming. Three macro trends are only just starting to accelerate, forming a very disruptive background to an already unsettled future. One is that technological transformations exponentially more consequential and rapid than anything prior are in their infancy, and will play out like several simultaneous industrial revolutions. ROBOT REVOLUTION It is still early days, but impacts are starting to be felt. Just yesterday, this line appeared in an article: “To meet demands at Foxconn, factory planners are building physical AI-powered robotic factories with Omniverse and NVIDIA AI.” In other words, they used AI
Nov. 25 to Dec. 1 The Dutch had a choice: join the indigenous Siraya of Sinkan Village (in today’s Tainan) on a headhunting mission or risk losing them as believers. Missionaries George Candidus and Robert Junius relayed their request to the Dutch governor, emphasizing that if they aided the Sinkan, the news would spread and more local inhabitants would be willing to embrace Christianity. Led by Nicolaes Couckebacker, chief factor of the trading post in Formosa, the party set out in December 1630 south toward the Makatao village of Tampsui (by today’s Gaoping River in Pingtung County), whose warriors had taken the
Last month historian Stephen Wertheim of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published an opinion piece in the New York Times with suggestions for an “America First” foreign policy for Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. Of course China and Taiwan received a mention. “Under presidents Trump and Biden,” Wertheim contends, “the world’s top two powers have descended into open rivalry, with tensions over Taiwan coming to the fore.” After complaining that Washington is militarizing the Taiwan issue, he argues that “In truth, Beijing has long proved willing to tolerate the island’s self-rule so long as Taiwan does not declare independence
RSS