The farming of African oil palms, which has transformed vast areas of Malaysia and Indonesia, is one of the world’s most controversial types of agriculture.
Demand for palm oil — a common ingredient in processed foods and personal care products — drives deforestation and the destruction of tropical peatlands. To make space for oil-palm plantations, tracts of forest are cleared, sometimes by bulldozer, but often by burning. Forest fires release huge amounts of carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas, as well as soot.
In Sumatra and Borneo, orangutans, rhinos, elephants and tigers are losing their habitats to the African oil palm, as are clouded leopards, pangolins, macaques and tapirs. Several of these species are vulnerable; some are critically endangered.
Photo courtesy of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
In Europe in particular, photos of orphaned orangutans upset consumers. Fearing boycotts, retailers have sought alternatives to palm oil, or to source the commodity from growers certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). This Kuala Lumpur-based NGO develops and implements global standards for the environmentally and ethically-sound production of palm oil.
The industry-dominated RSPO is not without its problems. It has been accused of greenwashing and, as recently as last month, of certifying palm oil produced on plantations guilty of serious labor abuses.
Switching from palm to other oils could be even worse for the environment. Joe Fassler, in the March 2016 issue of Smithsonian Magazine, points out that: “No other crop can yield even a third as much oil per acre planted. And along with using less land, the oil palm gobbles up significantly fewer pesticides and chemical fertilizers than coconut, corn or any other vegetable oil source.”
Photo: Steven Crook
At the end of 2018, British supermarket chain Iceland ceased manufacturing products which contain palm oil. By May 2019, UK department-store chain Selfridges had eliminated palm oil from its own-label range. British online retailer Ocado lists more than 2,100 palm oil-free items on its Web site.
CONSUMER PRESSURE LACKING
According to Carrefour’s global Web site, since 2015, 100 percent of the palm oil used in its own-brand products has come from RSPO-certified suppliers.
Carrefour, which has 131 stores in Taiwan, began working with RSPO in 2006. The French multinational’s palm oil procurement policy now includes RSPO standards “and additional requirements to do with protecting forests and peat bogs.”
In 2019, 86 percent of the palm oil shipped to Europe met RSPO standards. RSPO says it can’t provide a figure for Taiwan, but the behavior of local manufacturers and retailers — even those doing the right thing — suggests that local consumers’ priorities do not include saving the orangutan.
Sifting through Carrefour’s Taiwan Web site turns up very few mentions of sustainable palm oil. The frozen scallion pies and pancakes supplied by Taipei-based Laurel Corp are made using “green and sustainable internationally certified palm oil,” but that’s about all.
Searching for palm-oil free products brings up just three items. Two are car-care products; the third is a nut-flavored spread imported from France. Surely other items on Carrefour’s shelves in Taiwan include sustainable palm oil, or no palm oil whatsoever, but it seems there’s no incentive to highlight this characteristic.
The Environmental Impacts section of Costco’s global Web site says the company is committed to ensuring that all palm oil and other palm-based derivatives and fractions in its Kirkland Signature products “will be 100-percent RSPO certified (or equivalent) by 2021 or sooner.” This policy applies to the local sourcing team in Taiwan as well as to non-Kirkland Signature products made elsewhere. However, Costco’s Taiwan Web site currently doesn’t acknowledge this undertaking.
The Web site of RT-Mart, which operates 22 stores around Taiwan, makes no mention of sustainable palm oil. Nor does that of PX-Mart, a chain of 1,015 supermarkets.
By contrast, the English and Chinese versions of Hsin Tung Yang’s 2019 Corporate Social Responsibility Report highlight the company’s decision to begin using sustainable palm-oil products. In 2019, 14.3 percent of the palm oil purchased by Hsin Tung Yang — known for the meat jerkies and pineapple cakes it sells at Taiwan’s airports — was RSPO certified.
The number of Taiwanese companies holding RSPO membership grew in 2020 to 42, but Hsin Tung Yang and Laurel Corp aren’t among them.
Units of some high-profile conglomerates, including Uni-President Enterprises Corp and Want Want Holdings Ltd, have signed up to RSPO. Certain household names like I-Mei Foods Co (palm oil is an ingredient in its ice cream) and Kuai Kuai Co (whose signature snack includes palm oil) aren’t in the grouping.
Joining RSPO doesn’t necessarily mean a wholehearted embrace of the organization’s principles. As an e-mail from Chi Mei Frozen Food Co — an associate member since mid-2018, and the only local food producer willing to discuss the issue of palm oil with this reporter — concedes, if it weren’t for supply-chain pressure from outside Taiwan, there’d be even less progress on this issue.
“So far, we only use sustainable palm oil in one product [a type of frozen guabao bun], that is exported to Europe because our customer requires it. And we don’t use much of the oil since COVID-19 has hit the economy badly all over the world,” says a member of the company’s marketing and planning department.
GLOBAL PROBLEM
Taiwan isn’t the only place where food companies and soap manufacturers aren’t eager to source the palm oil they use from responsible growers.
China imported 8.49 million tonnes of palm oil in 2019, according to China Dialogue, an NGO that investigates the country’s environmental challenges. Less than 2 percent of it was RSPO-certified.
In Taiwan, several Chinese-language media have reported the consequences of the palm-oil industry’s rapid expansion. Local NGOs like the Environmental Information Center (環境資訊中心, e-info.org.tw) are trying to educate the public.
In recent years, palm oil has sold for between US$600 and US$750 per tonne, with a tonne of sustainable palm oil costing around US$30 more. This premium doesn’t make much difference to the cost of items on supermarket shelves, because palm oil is a minor ingredient in most finished products.
Ten years ago, CommonWealth magazine reported that in a nine-country survey of green consumerism, 24 percent of respondents were willing to pay more for eco-friendly goods, while according to the magazine’s own survey, 80 percent of Taiwanese respondents were amenable to paying a green premium.
Kantar’s Purpose in Asia report on consumer concerns, published in late 2018, found that Taiwanese were the only group (of nine Asia-Pacific nationalities surveyed) to put “climate action” among their top three concerns. Air pollution afflicting Taiwan was the top environmental issue.
Could it be that local consumers are still unaware of the ubiquity of palm oil in everyday products? Or that they say one thing, but do another when it comes to spending their own money? Or, perhaps, their interest in environmental issues doesn’t extend beyond the country’s borders? For the sake of Southeast Asia’s forests, it’s time local consumers began putting pressure on supermarkets and the companies they buy from.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
Peter Brighton was amazed when he found the giant jackfruit. He had been watching it grow on his farm in far north Queensland, and when it came time to pick it from the tree, it was so heavy it needed two people to do the job. “I was surprised when we cut it off and felt how heavy it was,” he says. “I grabbed it and my wife cut it — couldn’t do it by myself, it took two of us.” Weighing in at 45 kilograms, it is the heaviest jackfruit that Brighton has ever grown on his tropical fruit farm, located