Wednesday’s sweeping arrests of more than 50 pro-democracy activists, pollsters, politicians and fundraisers in Hong Kong seemed to all but criminalize opposition politics in the city.
Those arrested face charges of subversion for their role in unofficial primary elections held last summer that aimed to maximize the pro-democracy bloc’s performance in elections to the city’s legislative council.
“The plan of any opposition party is to win an election, [or] to be in a position for the government to negotiate with you; that is the virtue of democracy. So why it should be seen as a plot, as subversive? That’s beyond my comprehension, but that is the reality in Hong Kong,” said Prof Jean-Pierre Cabestan, professor at Hong Kong Baptist University. “Clearly we are moving towards a semi-authoritarian environment.”
Photo: Bloomberg
The long-shot goal of the loosely allied group who have been detained was to claim half the seats on the legislative body — despite an electoral process stacked against them by design — and to use that to block the government’s agenda and force the resignation of the city’s chief executive, Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥).
They were not planning to use violence, or break the law; the project took advantage of provisions laid out under the Basic Law, the city’s constitution.
The mass arrests showcased the Hong Kong authorities’ severely diminished tolerance for peaceful, political opposition in a city that just a year ago still enjoyed a limited form of autonomy.
Photo: Bloomberg
Last summer it was transformed by Beijing’s passage of a sweeping national security law, ostensibly to crackdown on protests that roiled the city for over a year but used to attack critics in politics and beyond including in the media, academia and education.
“What is normal in the rest of the world, and was normal in Hong Kong until a few months ago, is not normal in Hong Kong now,” said Victoria Hui (許田波), associate professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame, and specialist in Hong Kong politics.
“When the law was announced, [authorities] said it would only be used to target a small minority but it is obvious now it was meant to completely silence any dissent.”
Political parties have not been banned and other candidates can contest the elections, but Wednesday’s detentions raise the question of what, if anything, opposition lawmakers are actually allowed to do.
The arrests follow a months-long campaign against the city’s pro-democratic politicians, with some candidates initially barred from standing in the legislative elections, then serving pro-democratic lawmakers were disqualified.
The scale of Wednesday’s operation, with more than 1,000 officers deployed to round up some of Hong Kong’s most prominent pro-democracy figures, have shocked a movement accustomed to bleak news and with several leading figures — including the activist Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) and tycoon Jimmy Lai (黎智英) – already in jail.
Those who have been detained are unlikely to be able to contest the next elections, which were delayed for a year on the grounds of the pandemic and have now been rescheduled for the autumn; other candidates are likely to have less experience and recognition.
Trials would suck up huge amounts of funds and political energy that would otherwise have been poured into contesting the vote, Hui said.
But few expect it will mark the nadir for the city’s pro-democracy movement. One fear is that a provision of a law which allows suspects to be taken to the mainland for trial could be used against some of the group.
Hong Kong still has an independent judiciary, although authorities are allowed to handpick judges presiding over national security trials. China in contrast has an opaque and heavily politicized criminal justice system, dogged by persistent and credible accusations of mistreatment and torture.
Beijing’s critics are braced for security forces to make further moves against sectors including the media and academia which the authorities have already targeted.
And Wednesday’s detainees included the first American citizen held under the national security law, longtime resident John Clancey, a clear message to the city’s large expatriate community that foreign passports will not offer any protection if they become involved in pro-democracy politics or activism.
“Hong Kong has been experiencing this constant escalation for the last few months,” Hui said. “It means we just have to expect the worse is yet to come.”
There has been outrage from around the world, with condemnation from prominent politicians including the US president-elect, Joe Biden’s nominee for secretary of state, and the last British governor of Hong Kong, Chris Patten.
But with sanctions already imposed on the city’s leadership, there are questions about what more can be done. Ad hoc measures may not be the best response.
Instead the west might need to rethink how it dealt with Hong Kong, recognizing that the city has fundamentally changed, said Steve Tsang (曾銳生), director of the SOAS China Institute in London
“I think what we need to do is first of all recognize we are dealing with a paradigm change,” he said. The “special administrative region” (SAR) brought into existence, with all its rights and privileges, at the 1997 handover from British colonial rule, had effectively ended.
“We are talking about something very very different. If we are stuck in the mindset of SAR 1.0 and [China] are on SAR 2.0 we will never be effective in response to changes in Hong Kong.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Moritz Mieg, 22, lay face down in the rubble, the ground shaking violently beneath him. Boulders crashed down around him, some stones hitting his back. “I just hoped that it would be one big hit and over, because I did not want to be hit nearly to death and then have to slowly die,” the student from Germany tells Taipei Times. MORNING WALK Early on April 3, Mieg set out on a scenic hike through Taroko Gorge in Hualien County (花蓮). It was a fine day for it. Little did he know that the complex intersection of tectonic plates Taiwan sits
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50