It must surely be one of the most remarkable coincidences in modern publishing that Chen Chung-jen (陳重仁), an associate professor at National Taiwan University, should come up with a book on 19th century English epidemics and their treatment by Victorian novelists a mere three months before the coronavirus burst so unexpectedly on the contemporary scene.
“We still live in the shadow of Victorian contagions, our lives shaped by the fear they inspired and the ignorant, arrogant and prejudiced responses with which they were met,” he writes. “Victorian contagions are also our own.”
He can hardly have had an inkling of how prophetic his words would become.
In reality, though, Victorian Contagion doesn’t deal with epidemics as such, but more with the measures taken for avoiding them, such as the movements for ventilation, sanitation and fresh air in the habitations of the poor. Charles Dickens was at the forefront of this development, highlighting the squalid homes of London’s very poor in his second novel, Oliver Twist, following the largely comic concerns of his debut, Pickwick Papers.
Dickens dominates this book. Elisabeth Gaskell, who had researched poverty in Manchester rather than London, has her place, but George Eliot (the pen-name for Mary Ann Evans) isn’t dealt with at all, probably because she wrote about rural and provincial life rather than that of London, which had by her time become the biggest city in the world.
As for Gaskell, the author points out by reference to two of her letters (on which he lays great emphasis) that when she first met her fellow novelist Charlotte Bronte, whose biography she was to write, her emphasis was on the order and cleanliness of her home rather than her personal appearance.
Dickens was active on many levels, and not only because he believed the novel could change social conditions as well as expose them. He worked, for instance, to set up Urania Cottage, a home for reformed prostitutes, though this was an area he felt he couldn’t write about explicitly in his novels.
Instead, he wrote about fresh air. This was related to the concept of a “miasma,” bad and infectious air that was believed to hang over places such as garbage heaps, that was thought to be the medium through which disease was transmitted. When Prince Albert, Queen Victoria’s beloved consort, died of typhoid in 1861 it was believed he’d been the victim of an improbable lack of ventilation in the wing of Windsor Castle where he lived, not from contact with infected people.
And in Dickens’s Bleak House the High Court of Chancery is shrouded in fog and has an atmosphere of airlessness, as well as producing decayed properties endlessly awaiting its decisions through the length and breadth of the land.
Cleanliness was next to godliness, the Victorians believed. The mid-century movement for better sanitation was pioneered by Edwin Chadwick, whose Report on an Enquiry into the Sanitary Conditions of the Laboring Population of Great Britain was published in 1842 (at his own expense). Henry Mayhew’s London Labor and the London Poor also contributed to enlightening the middle classes as to the conditions surrounding them. It came out in 1851 in three volumes, following serial publication in the 1840s.
The older idea had been that disease was the result of immoral or deviant behavior. The theory of contagion, however, was of a “social network which subversibly connects us all.” Simultaneously, “germ theory”, which held that every disease had its own particular germ, began to replace “miasma-theory.” And of course germ-theory was the correct analysis.
In Our Mutual Friend, Dickens’s last completed novel, London is depicted as a city characterized by dung-heaps, or “dust heaps” as the Victorians called them. “Dust” was the Victorian term for garbage or trash, hence the term, still current in the UK, of garbage collectors as “dustmen.”
Epidemics struck where living conditions were worst, reformers such as Dickens believed. Reformed sanitation thus became the reformists’ cry. And it’s no accident that even today coronavirus deaths in the UK are reported to be twice as high in deprived areas as in prosperous ones, exactly as Chadwick found 170 years ago. Cholera, incidentally, was the main scourge in those days, with typhoid and tuberculosis not far behind.
Dickens had other concerns, of course. In Hard Times he rails against an education based solely on scientific facts, so that a school pupil, Sissy Jupe, who has spent her life alongside circus horses, is unable to comprehend her teacher’s references to “herbivorous quadrupeds.” Dickens went to Preston in Lancashire in 1854 to observe industrial conditions there, and then re-named the town as “Coketown” in his novel.
Parallels with the coronavirus are seen in a public notice from Gateshead in north-eastern England where residents are warned against intemperate habits such as the consumption of “spirituous liquors,” and urged to attend to “the cleanliness of the house.” Free and continued admission of fresh air to all parts of the house and furniture was judged as “most essential.” There’s no mention of social distancing, but the basic idea that living conditions equate with vulnerability is nevertheless ever-present.
Chen opts to make out that all this was related to an increase in social control as a whole. This may or may not be the case. It’s hard to imagine Dickens as a proponent of increased government authority, though grand schemes for the improvement of sanitation such as Joseph Bazalgette’s plans for, and achievement of, the construction of London’s first major sewer would surely have had his approval.
This is a clearly-written book, with no hint of academic jargon, and it is in addition well-organized and thought-out. The detail will probably prove too much for the ordinary reader, but academic libraries might consider acquiring a copy, though at US$155 it’s disgracefully expensive.
In 1990, Amy Chen (陳怡美) was beginning third grade in Calhoun County, Texas, as the youngest of six and the only one in her family of Taiwanese immigrants to be born in the US. She recalls, “my father gave me a stack of typed manuscript pages and a pen and asked me to find typos, missing punctuation, and extra spaces.” The manuscript was for an English-learning book to be sold in Taiwan. “I was copy editing as a child,” she says. Now a 42-year-old freelance writer in Santa Barbara, California, Amy Chen has only recently realized that her father, Chen Po-jung (陳伯榕), who
Famed Chinese demographer Yi Fuxian (易富賢) recently wrote for The Diplomat on the effects of a cross-strait war on demography. He contended that one way to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is by putting the demographic issue front and center — last year total births in the PRC, he said, receded to levels not seen since 1762. Yi observes that Taiwan’s current fertility rate is already lower than Ukraine’s — a nation at war that is refusing to send its young into battle — and that its “demographic crisis suggests that Taiwan’s technological importance will rapidly decline, and
Jan. 6 to Jan. 12 Perhaps hoping to gain the blessing of the stone-age hunter-gatherers that dwelt along the east coast 30,000 years ago, visitors to the Baxian Caves (八仙洞) during the 1970s would grab a handful of soil to bring home. In January 1969, the nation was captivated by the excavation of pre-ceramic artifacts and other traces of human habitation in several caves atop a sea cliff in Taitung County. The majority of the unearthed objects were single-faced, unpolished flake tools fashioned from natural pebbles collected by the shore. While archaeologists had found plenty of neolithic (7,000 BC to 1,700
These are volatile times for the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), with the party’s founder, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), in and out and back in jail repeatedly, Ko resigning as party chair and naming TPP caucus convener Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) to replace him and an upcoming party leadership vote. How representative of the party’s supporters has the party’s leadership been recently? The TPP caucus in the legislature is so closely aligned — and votes so similarly to — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) that they are in effect a pan-blue party now. Billing themselves as the “white force” between the pan-blue and pan-green
RSS