April 20 to April 26
The windows of Hoping Hospital were plastered with white banners as staff members clashed with the police as they were trying to escape. One nurse even tried to jump out the eighth floor window before being stopped by colleagues.
“We are healthy people, we want separation from SARS patients. We want to get out of Hoping Hospital and we don’t want to wait for death,” one sign read.
Photo: Wang Ching-wei and Chu Pei-hsiung, Taipei Times
Several days earlier on April 24, 2003, the Taipei City Government’s newly established SARS Emergency Response Task Force ordered the hospital to lock down and for its over 1,000 staff and patients to return to the facility to undergo collective quarantine for two weeks.
The move came after seven hospital staff came down with possible SARS symptoms on April 22. Up to that point, Taiwan had only seen 28 cases since the virus was first confirmed on March 14 and proudly announced its “three zeros” just a few days earlier: zero deaths, zero cluster infections and zero exported cases.
The number of suspected cases stemming from the hospital grew to 26 by the day of the shutdown. Panic ensued, especially due to the abruptness of the decision. Unprepared to deal with the situation, conditions in the hospital quickly worsened.
Photo: Wang Ching-wei and Chu Pei-hsiung, Taipei Times
Out of the 8,096 confirmed cases in 29 countries during the outbreak, 346 of them took place in Taiwan — with 150 reportedly occuring in Hoping Hospital. Reports of the hospital death toll vary between 24 and 35.
The nation’s bout with SARS is an often-mentioned factor in Taiwan’s success in containing the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Those of us who lived through the painful experience of SARS took the lessons to heart,” write Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital doctors Chang Tsang-neng (張藏能) and Hou Sheng-mao (侯勝茂) in the introduction to their article, “COVID-19 and the SARS experience.”
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
PANIC AT THE HOSPITAL
The SARS virus was first confirmed in Taiwan on March 14, imported by a businessman returning from China. It spread slowly at first, with 23 cases of infection reported over the next month.
The first case at Hoping Hospital was a laundry worker who began feeling unwell on April 12. Despite multiple tests, she was not diagnosed with SARS and remained on duty, living at the hospital and socializing with others. She was only put in an isolation room when her condition worsened on April 18, and tested positive on April 22.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The chaos in the hospital was recorded in hospital pediatrician Lin Ping-hung’s (林秉鴻) diary, which was serialized in the Liberty Times (Taipei Times’ sister newspaper). He writes that there were few directions on how exactly to carry out the quarantine, and the hospital was pretty much “under anarchy” in the first few days.
“Besides reinforcing public perception that ‘SARS spread from Hoping Hospital’ to punish us, I don’t see how this kind of quarantine adheres to virus prevention procedures. Why didn’t we just have uninfected staff members quarantine at home? If we were going to quarantine collectively, why didn’t they properly separate us?”
On April 27, Yeh Chin-chuan (葉金川), the health minister at the time, entered the hospital and remained there to ensure proper measures, keep order and boost morale. In addition to the unrest in the hospital, four staff members failed to return. Two checked themselves in after the police threatened to arrest them, and a warrant was issued on April 30 for the remaining two.
The B8 ward, where the laundry worker was being treated, was the hardest hit. A nurse says in the documentary Hoping Hospital (和平醫院) that at one point half of the 16 nurses on duty were infected, and by the time they were allowed to leave, there were only two nurses taking care of 16 SARS patients. The first nurse and doctor in Taiwan to die from SARS both worked at that ward.
Over the next week, staff and hospital workers were gradually moved out to other quarantine locations, with the last group departing on May 8.
By May 24, the situation had abated to the point that Lee Ming-liang (李明亮), head of the SARS-prevention command center, announced that people could resume their normal lives, although he stressed that the nation must remain alert. The WHO removed Taiwan from its list of infected areas on July 5.
WHO CARES?
Just like the current situation, Taiwan also had its issues with the WHO back then. Researchers complained of being shut off from samples and vital information because Taiwan wasn’t a member, instead being told to go through China. Much of Taiwan’s information was received via third party, significantly bogging down the process.
According to CNN, it took the WHO seven weeks after Taiwan’s first SARS infection and after the Hoping Hospital lockdown to send experts to the nation. Taiwanese experts were also invited to attend a July SARS conference in Kuala Lumpur. To show who was in charge, however, China announced its “approval” of both decisions — although Taiwan’s government stressed that China played no role in the events.
Then-foreign minister Eugene Chien (簡又新) wrote in an op-ed for the New York Times that “[m]ember states should stop allowing political expedience to dictate WHO policy. Taiwan needs the WHO just as much as the WHO needs us in fighting SARS and future epidemics.”
On May 29, then-US president George W. Bush signed a bill pledging to support Taiwan’s bid for WHA observer status. Japan and Canada, as well as most of Taiwan’s allies, also announced their support. China was not happy.
“Taiwan, a Chinese province, does not have qualifications to join WHO under any terms,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue (章啟月) warned.
The bid failed. Taiwan would only get its wish in 2009 under the designation “Chinese Taipei” following the improvement of relations with China under Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule. The invitation was rescinded in 2017 when the KMT lost power.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
A short walk beneath the dense Amazon canopy, the forest abruptly opens up. Fallen logs are rotting, the trees grow sparser and the temperature rises in places sunlight hits the ground. This is what 24 years of severe drought looks like in the world’s largest rainforest. But this patch of degraded forest, about the size of a soccer field, is a scientific experiment. Launched in 2000 by Brazilian and British scientists, Esecaflor — short for “Forest Drought Study Project” in Portuguese — set out to simulate a future in which the changing climate could deplete the Amazon of rainfall. It is
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
RSS